On 30/11/2013 03:39, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 30 November 2013 01:25, Kristján Valur Jónsson krist...@ccpgames.com wrote:
I know that Anatoly himself is a subject of long history here, but I myself
have felt lessening affinity to the dev community in recent years. It feels
like
it is
. nóvember 2013 03:39
To: Kristján Valur Jónsson
Cc: Antoine Pitrou; python-dev@python.org
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] PEP process entry point and ill fated initiatives
On 30 November 2013 01:25, Kristján Valur Jónsson krist...@ccpgames.com wrote:
I know that Anatoly himself is a subject of long history
: python-dev
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] PEP process entry point and ill fated initiatives
Anatoly, the Python community is a lot more diverse than you think. Pull
requests (whatever that means) are not the way to start a PEP. You should
start by focusing on the contents, and the mechanics of editing
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
Anatoly, the Python community is a lot more diverse than you think. Pull
requests (whatever that means) are not the way to start a PEP. You should
start by focusing on the contents, and the mechanics of editing it and
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 10:08 PM, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com wrote:
About ill fated initiatives. I don't like when people prematurely close
tickets
without waiting for the mutual agreement that the problem is solved. Perhaps
trackers should have personal agree/disagree/meh flags to
On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 09:16:38 +
Kristján Valur Jónsson krist...@ccpgames.com wrote:
Closing the ticket, twice, is a rude, and unnecessary action.
Closing the ticket means we don't believe there is an issue, or we
don't think it would be reasonable to fix it. If that's our judgement
on the
-Original Message-
From: Python-Dev [mailto:python-dev-
bounces+kristjan=ccpgames@python.org] On Behalf Of Antoine Pitrou
Sent: 29. nóvember 2013 14:58
To: python-dev@python.org
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] PEP process entry point and ill fated initiatives
On Fri, 29 Nov 2013
: Re: [Python-Dev] PEP process entry point and ill fated initiatives
On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 09:16:38 +
Kristján Valur Jónsson krist...@ccpgames.com wrote:
Closing the ticket, twice, is a rude, and unnecessary action.
Closing the ticket means we don't believe there is an issue, or we
On 29/11/2013 15:25, Kristján Valur Jónsson wrote:
I know that Anatoly himself is a subject of long history here, but I myself
have felt lessening affinity to the dev community in recent years. It feels
like
it is increasingly shutting itself in.
I entirely agree, the development community
Am 29.11.2013 10:16, schrieb Kristján Valur Jónsson:
Reading the defect, I find people being unnecessarily obstructive.
Closing the ticket, twice, is a rude, and unnecessary action. How about
acknowledging that these waters are dark and murky and help making things
better?
Surely,
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] PEP process entry point and ill fated
initiatives
On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 09:16:38 +
Kristján Valur Jónsson krist...@ccpgames.com wrote:
Closing the ticket, twice, is a rude, and unnecessary action.
Closing the ticket means we don't believe there is an issue, or we
On 29.11.2013 16:25, Kristján Valur Jónsson wrote:
How about acknowledging that these waters are dark and murky and help
making things better?
Well, how about? If Anatoly has a concrete proposal, surely he can propose a
patch to make things better.
Which is what he did. And instead of
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 03:25:14PM +, Kristján Valur Jónsson wrote
about the PEP process:
How about acknowledging that these waters are dark and murky and help
making things better?
Well, how about? If Anatoly has a concrete proposal, surely he can propose a
patch to make things
On 30 November 2013 01:25, Kristján Valur Jónsson krist...@ccpgames.com wrote:
I know that Anatoly himself is a subject of long history here, but I myself
have felt lessening affinity to the dev community in recent years. It feels
like
it is increasingly shutting itself in.
Are you sure it
I wanted to help people who are trying to find out more
about PEP submission process by providing relevant
info (or a pointer) in README.rst that is located at the
root of PEPs repository. You can see it here.
https://bitbucket.org/rirror/peps
I filled this issue with b.p.o
Anatoly, the Python community is a lot more diverse than you think. Pull
requests (whatever that means) are not the way to start a PEP. You should
start by focusing on the contents, and the mechanics of editing it and
getting it formatted properly are secondary. The process is explained in
PEP
16 matches
Mail list logo
