"Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Abrahams schrieb:
>>> I'm not sure whether you are requesting these for yourself or for
>>> somebody else. If for somebody else, that somebody else should seriously
>>> consider building Python himself, and publishing the result.
>>
>> I'm req
David Abrahams schrieb:
>> I'm not sure whether you are requesting these for yourself or for
>> somebody else. If for somebody else, that somebody else should seriously
>> consider building Python himself, and publishing the result.
>
> I'm requesting it for the many Boost.Python (heck, all Python
"Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm not sure whether you are requesting these for yourself or for
> somebody else. If for somebody else, that somebody else should seriously
> consider building Python himself, and publishing the result.
I'm requesting it for the many Boost.Python (
David Abrahams schrieb:
> At the moment I have too weak a server to provide those files, but
> that will change very soon. All that said, the Python and ActiveState
> teams need to be aware of each and every Python release and go through
> a standard release procedure anyway, whereas -- except fo
"Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dave Abrahams schrieb:
>> The only problem here is that there appears to be a lag in the release of
>> ActivePython after Python itself is released.
>>
>> Is there any chance of putting up just the debugging libraries a little
>> earlier?
>
> I may
Dave Abrahams schrieb:
> The only problem here is that there appears to be a lag in the release of
> ActivePython after Python itself is released.
>
> Is there any chance of putting up just the debugging libraries a little
> earlier?
I may be out of context here: what is the precise problem in p
Trent Mick ActiveState.com> writes:
>
> [Thomas Heller wrote]
> > Anyway, AFAIK, the activestate distribution contains Python debug dlls.
>
> [Er, a month late, but I was in flitting around Australia at the time. :)]
>
> Yes, as a separate download.
>
> ftp://ftp.activestate.com/ActivePyt
Trent Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [Thomas Heller wrote]
>> Anyway, AFAIK, the activestate distribution contains Python debug dlls.
>
> [Er, a month late, but I was in flitting around Australia at the time. :)]
>
> Yes, as a separate download.
>
> ftp://ftp.activestate.com/ActivePython/e
[Thomas Heller wrote]
> Anyway, AFAIK, the activestate distribution contains Python debug dlls.
[Er, a month late, but I was in flitting around Australia at the time. :)]
Yes, as a separate download.
ftp://ftp.activestate.com/ActivePython/etc/
ActivePython--win32-ix86-debug.zip
And
David Abrahams wrote:
>>I would go a step further than Tim: Send me (*) a patch to msi.py (which
>>is used to build the distribution) that picks up the files and packages
>>them in the desired way, and I will include the files it outputs
>>in the official distribution. This is how the libpython24.a
"Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>>> Just to clarify - what we are asking for is library built with
>>> _DEBUG and no BOOST_DEBUG_PYTHON, that is the one compatible with
>>> default Python distribution.
>> I know you're trying to help, but I'm sure that's not
"Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> Who knows what the whiny babies will accept? That said, I think
>> people would be happy with a .zip file containing whatever is built by
>> selecting the debug build in the VS project and asking it to build
>> everything. (
David Abrahams wrote:
>>Just to clarify - what we are asking for is library built with _DEBUG
>>and no BOOST_DEBUG_PYTHON, that is the one compatible with default
>>Python distribution.
>
>
> I know you're trying to help, but I'm sure that's not making anything
> clearer for these people. The
David Abrahams wrote:
> Who knows what the whiny babies will accept? That said, I think
> people would be happy with a .zip file containing whatever is built by
> selecting the debug build in the VS project and asking it to build
> everything. (**)
I would go a step further than Tim: Send me (*)
Bronek Kozicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> Who knows what the whiny babies will accept? That said, I think
>> people would be happy with a .zip file containing whatever is built by
>> selecting the debug build in the VS project and asking it to build
>> everything. (**)
Tim Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [David Abrahams]
>> For years, Boost.Python has been doing some hacks to work around the
>> fact that a Windows Python distro doesn't include the debug build of
>> the library.
>> ...
>> MS is recommending that we (Boost) start distributing a debug build of
Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I vaguely recall that there were problems with distributing the debug
> version of the MS runtime.
Right: the debug runtime dlls are not disributable.
> Anyway, why can't you do this yourself for all Boost users? It's all
> volunteer time, you know.
[David Abrahams]
> For years, Boost.Python has been doing some hacks to work around the
> fact that a Windows Python distro doesn't include the debug build of
> the library.
> ...
> MS is recommending that we (Boost) start distributing a debug build of the
> Python DLL with Boost, but Boost really
I vaguely recall that there were problems with distributing the debug
version of the MS runtime.
Anyway, why can't you do this yourself for all Boost users? It's all
volunteer time, you know...
--Guido
On 11/4/05, Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> For years, Boost.Python has been doing some hacks to work around the fact
> that a Windows Python distro doesn't include the debug build of the library.
[...]
> Having to download the Python source and build the debug DLL was deemed
> unacceptable.
For years, Boost.Python has been doing some hacks to work around the
fact that a Windows Python distro doesn't include the debug build of
the library.
http://www.boost.org/libs/python/doc/building.html#variants
explains. We wanted to make it reasonably convenient for Windows
developers (and
21 matches
Mail list logo
