On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 at 04:56, Carol Willing wrote:
> That's a fair point. We expect to do a hand-off meeting with the new SC to
> discuss. Although personally I would like to see a pattern matching solution,
> we didn't have consensus within the existing SC for many of the reasons
> already
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 7:32 AM Paul Moore wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 15:19, David Mertz wrote:
> >
> > As a candidate for the new SC, if elected I would certainly find it more
> useful to have more specific thoughts from the outgoing SC than simply "we
> recommend." How divided was the
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 15:19, David Mertz wrote:
>
> As a candidate for the new SC, if elected I would certainly find it more
> useful to have more specific thoughts from the outgoing SC than simply "we
> recommend." How divided was the vote? Who took the sides? What were the major
> points of
As a candidate for the new SC, if elected I would certainly find it more
useful to have more specific thoughts from the outgoing SC than simply "we
recommend." How divided was the vote? Who took the sides? What were the
major points of disagreement? That sort of thing.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 9:39
On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 11:29:55 -0800
Brett Cannon wrote:
> After much deliberation, the 2020 SC will be making a recommendation to the
> 2021 SC to accept PEP 634 (although this was not a unanimous decision).
> This is in no way a binding recommendation to the 2021 SC (even if a
> majority of
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020, 23:10 Bernat Gabor wrote:
> This opens the door for people voting on A or B depending on if they would
> accept or reject the PEP. Is this something we're willing to accept?
>
The SC is, and I tried to make that clear in my earlier post about these
PEPs (
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020, 22:34 Ethan Furman via Python-Dev <
python-dev@python.org> wrote:
> On 12/7/20 11:29 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
> > After much deliberation, the 2020 SC will be making a recommendation to
> the 2021 SC to accept PEP 634 (although this was
> > not a unanimous decision).
>
>
This opens the door for people voting on A or B depending on if they would
accept or reject the PEP. Is this something we're willing to accept?
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 9:29 PM Ethan Furman via Python-Dev <
python-dev@python.org> wrote:
> On 12/7/20 11:29 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
> > After much
On 12/7/20 11:29 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
After much deliberation, the 2020 SC will be making a recommendation to the 2021 SC to accept PEP 634 (although this was
not a unanimous decision).
This seems very odd. The Steering Council is elected to make decisions, but it feels like the current
