https://bugs.python.org/issue42815
https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/24074
I would love to have this in Python 3.10, but the interaction with
"decimal" context has a risk I don't know how to evaluate, neither the
impact of a new "context" parameter when launching a new thread. It
could
Hi all,
Could someone help take a look at the following PR, which fixes one of the
broken socket module tests that exercises part of the standard library?
PR Link: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/19548
BPO Link: https://bugs.python.org/issue40297
The test can be run locally on Linux by
Hi all,
Could someone take a look at the following PR to add support for CAN_J1939
to the socket module? I'd like to try landing this for 3.9. This
enhancement would be useful for anyone working in automotive and/or dealing
with the SAE J1939 CAN protocol.
This feature is available on Linux 5.4+
FWIW I wrote up what I recall about the issue and kicked it to the next
BDFL: https://bugs.python.org/issue30140#msg325553
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 6:42 PM Stephan Hoyer wrote:
> Over a year ago, I made a pull request (
> https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/1325) to fix a long-standing issue
Over a year ago, I made a pull request (
https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/1325) to fix a long-standing issue
with how Python handles dispatch for arithmetic binary operations involving
subclasses (https://bugs.python.org/issue30140).
I pinged the bug several times, but I'm still waiting for
Hi,
Can I request a review of https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/6641.
It has been open for a few months now.
Cheers,
Mark.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
Hello,
I have submitted a patch and a test script for issue 4037 on the bug
tracker, doctest.py should include method descriptors when looking
inside a class __dict__
http://bugs.python.org/issue4037
I would be grateful if somebody could review it please, and if suitable,
commit it.
Thank
Hi,
As I mentioned earlier I'd like to get patch 1446489 (support for
zip64 extensions in the zipfile module) in python 2.5. The patch
should be perfectly safe, it comes with unittests and a documentation
update. I'm also using this version of zipfile in (closed-source)
projects to handle
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
There are two backward incompatbile changes, both minor. First of all
ZipInfo will lose the file_offset attribute because calculating it
when opening a zipfile is very expensive (it basically requires a
full scan of the zipfile). This should
On 13-jun-2006, at 15:08, Aahz wrote:
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
There are two backward incompatbile changes, both minor. First of all
ZipInfo will lose the file_offset attribute because calculating it
when opening a zipfile is very expensive (it basically requires a
full
As I mentioned earlier I'd like to get patch 1446489 (support for
zip64 extensions in the zipfile module) in python 2.5. The patch
should be perfectly safe, it comes with unittests and a documentation
update. I'm also using this version of zipfile in (closed-source)
projects to handle
Tim Peters wrote:
[Georg Brandl]
Hm. This broke a few doctests. I can fix them, but I wonder if
doctest should accept a bare exception name if the exception
is defined in the current module.
No.
Or should it ignore the module name altogether?
No. doctest strives to be magic-free
Can someone have a look at #860326? I got bitten by it today, and I can
see no reason not to apply suggested patch.
Thanks!
Seo Sanghyeon
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
Seo Sanghyeon wrote:
Can someone have a look at #860326? I got bitten by it today, and I can
see no reason not to apply suggested patch.
I've reviewed it and checked it in.
Cheers,
Georg
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
Georg Brandl wrote:
Seo Sanghyeon wrote:
Can someone have a look at #860326? I got bitten by it today, and I can
see no reason not to apply suggested patch.
I've reviewed it and checked it in.
Hm. This broke a few doctests. I can fix them, but I wonder if
doctest should accept a bare
[Georg Brandl]
Hm. This broke a few doctests. I can fix them, but I wonder if
doctest should accept a bare exception name if the exception
is defined in the current module.
No.
Or should it ignore the module name altogether?
No. doctest strives to be magic-free WYSIWYG. If someone
16 matches
Mail list logo
