On 03/09/14 02:37, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
I'm not sure that's an answer to the problem. What we need is not more
machines, but dedicated buildbot maintainers.
I would love to get an email if my buildbots are consistently RED for a
few hours.
In the past Antoine, Victor and others pinged me
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 2:45 AM, Jesus Cea j...@jcea.es wrote:
On 03/09/14 02:37, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
I'm not sure that's an answer to the problem. What we need is not more
machines, but dedicated buildbot maintainers.
I would love to get an email if my buildbots are consistently RED for a
On 10/10/14 17:56, Chris Angelico wrote:
Could I write a little
monitor at my end that asks every hour if my buildbots can be seen?
AFAIK maintainers already get an email if the buildbot vanishes long
enough. I am more interested in getting an email when my buildbot is
consistently red because
On 10/10/14 17:45, Jesus Cea wrote:
Thanks for your patience and for notifying me issues when you suffer them.
Another issue is changes that actually breaks buildbots and I don't
actually know where to start debugging. For instance, currently:
It's https://bugs.python.org/issue19884
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014, at 12:08, R. David Murray wrote:
On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 18:00:06 +0200, Jesus Cea j...@jcea.es wrote:
On 10/10/14 17:56, Chris Angelico wrote:
Could I write a little
monitor at my end that asks every hour if my buildbots can be
On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 18:00:06 +0200, Jesus Cea j...@jcea.es wrote:
On 10/10/14 17:56, Chris Angelico wrote:
Could I write a little
monitor at my end that asks every hour if my buildbots can be seen?
AFAIK maintainers already get an email if the buildbot vanishes long
enough. I am more
On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 12:08:54 -0400
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com wrote:
On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 18:00:06 +0200, Jesus Cea j...@jcea.es wrote:
On 10/10/14 17:56, Chris Angelico wrote:
Could I write a little
monitor at my end that asks every hour if my buildbots can be seen?
AFAIK
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Victor Stinner victor.stin...@gmail.com
wrote:
ARMv7 3.x: Read-only file system, Mercurial fails...
I sent an email to Gregory P. Smith (owner).
For mine, its a case of me not having any monitoring for it. Sending me an
email worked.
In this case the SSD (a
Ok,
I've put everything under the tools directory of the build server for
the project home:cavallo71:opt-python-interpreters:
https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:cavallo71:opt-python-interpreters/tools
To get started you need using the osc client (it uses the same
subversion
On 8 Sep 2014 04:51, Antonio Cavallo a.cava...@cavallinux.eu wrote:
Ok,
I've put everything under the tools directory of the build server for the
project home:cavallo71:opt-python-interpreters:
https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:cavallo71:opt-python-interpreters/tools
To get
On 4 September 2014 15:45, Shorya Raj rajsho...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, have you considered using Travis? It would allow us to add to the
configurations, at least generally...
Many SaaS solution assume the use of specific centralised identity
providers, which isn't a function we're prepared to
On 4 September 2014 16:59, Shorya Raj rajsho...@gmail.com wrote:
The limiting factor is generally time - various aspects of the current
system are clumsy, but they work, so unless someone is particularly
keen and willing to work through all the factors that led to the
current setup and propose
Yes there are details indeed. But not show stoppers. A prototype can be seen
here: http://cclimited.webfactional.com
The nice bit is testing will be executed in a total fresh instance, an added
bonus
On 4 September 2014 05:16:01 GMT+01:00, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 September
On 4 September 2014 18:50, A. Cavallo a.cava...@cavallinux.eu wrote:
Yes there are details indeed. But not show stoppers. A prototype can be
seen here: http://cclimited.webfactional.com
The nice bit is testing will be executed in a total fresh instance, an added
bonus
Oh, very nice!
What is
Also, have you considered using Travis? It would allow us to add to the
configurations, at least generally...
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 September 2014 11:07, Antonio Cavallo a.cava...@cavallinux.eu
wrote:
I wonder if there is any interest in
The limiting factor is generally time - various aspects of the current
system are clumsy, but they work, so unless someone is particularly
keen and willing to work through all the factors that led to the
current setup and propose changes (including at least a rough concept
of how ongoing
And so what would need to be done to rectify this problem? If there are no
objections, I would like to resolve this particular point, at least until
better people can be found to do so.
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 8:50 PM, A. Cavallo a.cava...@cavallinux.eu wrote:
Yes there are details indeed. But
Setting up a repo with the code and cleaning a bit here and there.
Over the weekend I can put something useable.
Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 4 September 2014 18:50, A. Cavalloa.cava...@cavallinux.eu wrote:
Yes there are details indeed. But not show stoppers. A prototype can be
seen here:
Hi all
I am using buildbot now for some time and i would be willing to contribute on
that. I had small work on openstack buildbot slave but had not the proper
infrastructure to get more value out of it. I like that project and automation.
Anyway, if i could be of help let me know (;
Short to
As mentioned, I don't mind sysadmining a bit, if required. My primary joy
would be helping code python, but can't seem to figure out the ideal place
to start doing so. Therefore, helping out as sysadmin would be a good start.
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Cameron Simpson c...@zip.com.au wrote:
[...] But it
does mean a measure of trust in some external entity, or else some
very careful rules (mainly firewall), which not every coder will know
about.
Just curious, is there a way to mount the infrastructure the oder way
around? One sets a system polling for sources changes, if so it
2014-09-03 0:13 GMT+02:00 Victor Stinner victor.stin...@gmail.com:
AMD64 OpenIndiana 3.x: a lot of tests fail with OSError(12, Not
enough space) or MemoryError. It's probably on issue on the host.
x86 OpenIndiana 3.x: MemoryError. TestReadline.test_init() also fails.
I sent an email to Jesus
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 3:32 AM, francis franci...@email.de wrote:
does mean a measure of trust in some external entity, or else some
very careful rules (mainly firewall), which not every coder will know
about.
Just curious, is there a way to mount the infrastructure the oder way
around? One
I wonder if there is any interest in starting to use the opensuse build
servers for continuous build and testing on redhat, fedora suse and (I
think) debian: that will solve once for all the maintenance issues on
those platforms (and provide a reliable build).
Regards,
Antonio
On 4 September 2014 11:07, Antonio Cavallo a.cava...@cavallinux.eu wrote:
I wonder if there is any interest in starting to use the opensuse build
servers for continuous build and testing on redhat, fedora suse and (I
think) debian: that will solve once for all the maintenance issues on those
Hi,
I'm using Python buildbots to ensure that my changes don't fail on
some platform. It's important for changes close to the operation
system. The problem is that many buildbots are ill.
Before, only a few buildbots had sporadic failures. Now most buildbots
are always fail (are red).
Here is
On 3 Sep 2014 08:15, Victor Stinner victor.stin...@gmail.com wrote:
x86 RHEL 6 3.x: TestReadline.test_init() fails, issue #19884. I don't
have to this platform, I don't know how to fix it.
Sorry, I haven't been a very good maintainer for that buildbot (the main
reason it never graduated to the
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 Sep 2014 08:15, Victor Stinner victor.stin...@gmail.com wrote:
x86 RHEL 6 3.x: TestReadline.test_init() fails, issue #19884. I don't
have to this platform, I don't know how to fix it.
Sorry, I haven't been a
On 3 Sep 2014 09:00, Brian Curtin br...@python.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
From a completely different perspective, does anyone have experience
with using BuildBot with OpenStack hosted clients? We may be able to take
advantage of the PSF's
On 03Sep2014 00:13, Victor Stinner victor.stin...@gmail.com wrote:
AMD64 Snow Leop 3.x: many tests are not reliable (stable) on this
platform. For example, test_logging.test_race() sometimes fail with
PermissionError(1, Operation not permitted:
'/tmp/test_logging-3-bjulw8iz.log'). Another
On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 00:13:22 +0200
Victor Stinner victor.stin...@gmail.com wrote:
AMD64 Snow Leop 3.x: many tests are not reliable (stable) on this
platform. For example, test_logging.test_race() sometimes fail with
PermissionError(1, Operation not permitted:
On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 08:53:51 +1000
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 Sep 2014 08:15, Victor Stinner victor.stin...@gmail.com wrote:
x86 RHEL 6 3.x: TestReadline.test_init() fails, issue #19884. I don't
have to this platform, I don't know how to fix it.
Sorry, I haven't been a
Nick Coghlan writes:
Sorry, I haven't been a very good maintainer for that buildbot (the main
reason it never graduated to the stable list). If you send me your public
SSH key, I can add it (I think - if not, I can ask Luke to do it).
Alternatively, CentOS 6 may exhibit the same problem.
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull step...@xemacs.org wrote:
Nick Coghlan writes:
Sorry, I haven't been a very good maintainer for that buildbot (the main
reason it never graduated to the stable list). If you send me your public
SSH key, I can add it (I think - if not,
Hello all
I don't mind helping out with maintaining buildbots / other build machines.
Although I don't have a lot of experience with this sort of thing (I
usually just ran a Jenkins for my own work), I think it would be a useful
way to contribute. Let me know what I should do if you are all fine
On 03Sep2014 11:47, Stephen J. Turnbull step...@xemacs.org wrote:
Nick Coghlan writes:
Sorry, I haven't been a very good maintainer for that buildbot (the main
reason it never graduated to the stable list). If you send me your public
SSH key, I can add it (I think - if not, I can ask Luke to
36 matches
Mail list logo
