On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 09:55:10AM +0200, Petr Viktorin wrote:
> Is paying the best way to get features into Python?
No, but it is *a* way to get features into Python.
It may be a good way to get a feature that is important to (generic)
you, but the core devs don't have enough time, interest
On 10/4/2018 9:55 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
> On 10/4/18 9:34 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> If IBM wants a better Python support, it would help a lot if IBM pays
>> for this development.
I agree. If IBM ...
>> ... Antoine Pitrou has been paid in the past to enhance Python
>> support in
On 10/4/18 9:34 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
Hi,
If IBM wants a better Python support, it would help a lot if IBM pays
for this development. With money, you can easily find core dev
contractors. Antoine Pitrou has been paid in the past to enhance Python
support in Solaris and it worked well.
Hi,
If IBM wants a better Python support, it would help a lot if IBM pays for
this development. With money, you can easily find core dev contractors.
Antoine Pitrou has been paid in the past to enhance Python support in
Solaris and it worked well.
Victor
Le mercredi 3 octobre 2018, Michael Felt
On 10/3/2018 1:46 AM, Neil Schemenauer wrote:
> On 2018-10-02, Michael Felt wrote:
>> I am sorry, for myself obviously - but also for Python. Obviously, I am
>> doing it all wrong - as I see lots of other issues being picked up
>> immediately.
> I'm not sure that's the case. There are a lot of
On 10/3/2018 2:48 AM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 10/2/2018 7:16 PM, Michael Felt wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/2/2018 11:34 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
>>> On 10/2/2018 12:41 PM, Simon Cross wrote:
Are there any core devs that Michael or Erik could collaborate with?
Rather than rely on adhoc patch
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 8:54 PM Michael Felt wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/2/2018 4:45 PM, Erik Bray wrote:
> > Michael, if there are any PRs you want to point me to that I might be
> > able to help review please do.
> A little trick I learned:
>
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 6:41 PM Simon Cross
wrote:
>
> Are there any core devs that Michael or Erik could collaborate with?
> Rather than rely on adhoc patch review from random core developers.
>
> Michael and Eric: Question -- are you interested in becoming core
> developers at least for the
On 10/2/2018 7:16 PM, Michael Felt wrote:
On 10/2/2018 11:34 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 10/2/2018 12:41 PM, Simon Cross wrote:
Are there any core devs that Michael or Erik could collaborate with?
Rather than rely on adhoc patch review from random core developers.
You two might collaborate
On 2018-10-02, Michael Felt wrote:
> I am sorry, for myself obviously - but also for Python. Obviously, I am
> doing it all wrong - as I see lots of other issues being picked up
> immediately.
I'm not sure that's the case. There are a lot of PRs or bugs that
sit there without getting reviews.
On 10/2/2018 11:34 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 10/2/2018 12:41 PM, Simon Cross wrote:
>> Are there any core devs that Michael or Erik could collaborate with?
>> Rather than rely on adhoc patch review from random core developers.
>
> You two might collaborate with each other to the extent of
On 10/2/2018 12:41 PM, Simon Cross wrote:
Are there any core devs that Michael or Erik could collaborate with?
Rather than rely on adhoc patch review from random core developers.
You two might collaborate with each other to the extent of reviewing
some of each other's PRs. That still leaves
On 10/2/2018 4:45 PM, Erik Bray wrote:
> Michael, if there are any PRs you want to point me to that I might be
> able to help review please do.
A little trick I learned:
https://github.com/python/cpython/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+author%3Aaixtools+sort%3Aupdated-desc
lists them all.
What
I am willing to assist as best I can with AIX - I seem to have the core
requirements re: time available: (i.e., over-comitted at work, but
'work' evenings and weekends on OSS :p)
On 10/2/2018 6:41 PM, Simon Cross wrote:
> Are there any core devs that Michael or Erik could collaborate with?
>
Are there any core devs that Michael or Erik could collaborate with?
Rather than rely on adhoc patch review from random core developers.
Michael and Eric: Question -- are you interested in becoming core
developers at least for the purposes of maintaining these platforms in
future?
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 3:53 AM Tres Seaver wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 10/01/2018 06:41 PM, Michael Felt wrote:
>
> > And, while you may not give a damn about anything other than Windows,
> > macos and/or Linux - there are other platforms that would like a
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/01/2018 06:41 PM, Michael Felt wrote:
> And, while you may not give a damn about anything other than Windows,
> macos and/or Linux - there are other platforms that would like a
> stable Python.
Michael,
I can understand the frustration you
Hi Michael, and welcome,
On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 12:41:56AM +0200, Michael Felt wrote:
[...]
> FYI: since the end of July I have dedicated 16 to 24 hours of my free
> time to get this done. All for Python; all in my freetime. My employer
> does not care - I do, or did.
[...]
> I am, to put it
Dear core-devs,
I have some bad characteristics.
I can be extremely enthusiastic - and write too much. I have been trying
to not write - anything - worried that my enthusiasm is not matched by
yours, or worse was a reason to ignore my work to get AIX passing all tests.
FYI: since the end of
19 matches
Mail list logo
