Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On 10/9/05, Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Based on the discussion, I think I'd go with defaultproperty.
>
>
> Great.
>
>
>>Questions:
>>
>>- Should this be in builtins, alongside property, or in
>> a library module? (Oleg suggested propertytools.)
>>
>>-
Calvin Spealman wrote:
> I mean, come on, its like making a module just to store a bunch of
> unrelated types just to lump them together because they're types.
import types
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/ma
Jim Fulton wrote:
> Based on the discussion, I think I'd go with defaultproperty.
>
> Questions:
>
> - Should this be in builtins, alongside property, or in
>a library module? (Oleg suggested propertytools.)
>
> - Do we need a short PEP?
The much-discussed never-created decorators module, p
On 10/9/05, Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Based on the discussion, I think I'd go with defaultproperty.
Great.
> Questions:
>
> - Should this be in builtins, alongside property, or in
>a library module? (Oleg suggested propertytools.)
>
> - Do we need a short PEP?
I think so. From
Based on the discussion, I think I'd go with defaultproperty.
Questions:
- Should this be in builtins, alongside property, or in
a library module? (Oleg suggested propertytools.)
- Do we need a short PEP?
Jim
Jim Fulton wrote:
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
>>On 9/28/05, Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PR
