Terry Reedy schrieb:
| We should also consider the semantics in more detail. Should the seek
| position be shared between the two objects? What about buffering?
|
| That's definitely the hard part. But it's somewhat similar to
| normal mutable objects which are (I think always, right?)
On 13/01/2007 1.37, Brett Cannon wrote:
For security reasons I might be asking for file's constructor to be
removed from the type for Python source code at some point (it can be
relocated to an extension module if desired).
Isn't there the wrong list then? I can't see how this can ever
Forwarded for discussion from http://www.python.org/sf/1633665.
--amk
[forwarded from http://bugs.debian.org/327060]
Many types in Python are idempotent, so that int(1) works
as expected, float(2.34)==2.34, ''.join('hello')=='hello'
et cetera.
Why not file()? Currently, file(open(something,
On 1/12/07, A.M. Kuchling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Forwarded for discussion from http://www.python.org/sf/1633665.
--amk
[forwarded from http://bugs.debian.org/327060]
Many types in Python are idempotent, so that int(1) works
as expected, float(2.34)==2.34, ''.join('hello')=='hello'
et
On 12-Jan-2007, at 19:01 , Guido van Rossum wrote:
On 1/12/07, A.M. Kuchling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Many types in Python are idempotent, so that int(1) works
as expected, float(2.34)==2.34, ''.join('hello')=='hello'
et cetera.
I'm not sure I understand the use case; I don't believe I've
On 1/12/07, A.M. Kuchling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Forwarded for discussion from http://www.python.org/sf/1633665.
--amk
[forwarded from http://bugs.debian.org/327060]
Many types in Python are idempotent, so that int(1) works
as expected, float(2.34)==2.34, ''.join('hello')=='hello'
et
On 12:37 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For security reasons I might be asking for file's constructor to be
removed from the type for Python source code at some point (it can be
relocated to an extension module if desired). By forcing people to go
through open() to create a file object you can
On 1/12/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12:37 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For security reasons I might be asking for file's constructor to be
removed from the type for Python source code at some point (it can be
relocated to an extension module if desired). By forcing
On 02:42 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wrapper around open() that does proper checking of its arguments. I
will be discussing my security stuff at PyCon if you are attending and
are interested.
I am both, so I guess I'll see you there :).
___
Jack Jansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| On 12-Jan-2007, at 19:01 , Guido van Rossum wrote:
|
| On 1/12/07, A.M. Kuchling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Many types in Python are idempotent, so that int(1) works
| as expected, float(2.34)==2.34,
10 matches
Mail list logo
