Re: [Python-Dev] pootle.python.org is down

2014-02-16 Thread INADA Naoki
FYI, Japanese translation project is now uses Transifex to translate Py3k document. https://www.transifex.com/projects/p/python-33-ja/ http://docs.python.jp/3/ On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 8:13 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > > On 17 Feb 2014 02:20, "Georg Brandl" wrote: >> >> Am 16.02.2014 16:32, schrieb

Re: [Python-Dev] pootle.python.org is down

2014-02-16 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 17 Feb 2014 02:20, "Georg Brandl" wrote: > > Am 16.02.2014 16:32, schrieb Benjamin Peterson: > > On Sun, Feb 16, 2014, at 06:52 AM, A.M. Kuchling wrote: > >> I came across http://bugs.python.org/issue13663, which is about a > >> pootle.python.org installation. http://pootle.python.org/ current

Re: [Python-Dev] pootle.python.org is down

2014-02-16 Thread Georg Brandl
Am 16.02.2014 16:32, schrieb Benjamin Peterson: > On Sun, Feb 16, 2014, at 06:52 AM, A.M. Kuchling wrote: >> I came across http://bugs.python.org/issue13663, which is about a >> pootle.python.org installation. http://pootle.python.org/ currently >> returns a 500. Are we still using Pootle, or sho

Re: [Python-Dev] pootle.python.org is down

2014-02-16 Thread Benjamin Peterson
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014, at 06:52 AM, A.M. Kuchling wrote: > I came across http://bugs.python.org/issue13663, which is about a > pootle.python.org installation. http://pootle.python.org/ currently > returns a 500. Are we still using Pootle, or should I just close #13663? > (Maybe the installation go

[Python-Dev] pootle.python.org is down

2014-02-16 Thread A.M. Kuchling
I came across http://bugs.python.org/issue13663, which is about a pootle.python.org installation. http://pootle.python.org/ currently returns a 500. Are we still using Pootle, or should I just close #13663? (Maybe the installation got broken in the move to OSL and then forgotten?) --amk