On 03.11.10 19:21, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Python code coverage doesn't include any .py files. What happened?
> http://coverage.livinglogic.de/
>
> Did it work before?
It did, however currently the logfile
http://coverage.livinglogic.de/testlog.txt
shows the following exception:
On 06.04.2010 11:50, Senthil Kumaran wrote:
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 12:40:35PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote:
Where can I find public reports with Python tests code coverage?
Here:
http://coverage.livinglogic.de/
And the script that generates that output is available from the cheeseshop:
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 12:42, C. Titus Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 10:36:14PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
> > >
> > Where can I find public reports with Python tests code coverage?
> > >>>
> > >>> Here:
> > >>>
> > >>> h
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 10:36:14PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
> >
> Where can I find public reports with Python tests code coverage?
> >>>
> >>> Here:
> >>>
> >>> http://coverage.livinglogic.de/
> >>
> >> Thank you. What is the status
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
>
Where can I find public reports with Python tests code coverage?
>>>
>>> Here:
>>>
>>> http://coverage.livinglogic.de/
>>
>> Thank you. What is the status of getting these stats on python.org?
>
> Wouldn't "status" imply that there is a pl
Am 06.04.2010 13:50, schrieb anatoly techtonik:
> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Senthil Kumaran wrote:
>>> Where can I find public reports with Python tests code coverage?
>>
>> Here:
>>
>> http://coverage.livinglogic.de/
>
> Thank you. What is the status of getting these stats on python.org?
Senthil Kumaran gmail.com> writes:
>
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 12:40:35PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> > Where can I find public reports with Python tests code coverage?
>
> Here:
>
> http://coverage.livinglogic.de/
The fact that the log shows some test failures isn't very comforting.
Re
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Senthil Kumaran wrote:
>> Where can I find public reports with Python tests code coverage?
>
> Here:
>
> http://coverage.livinglogic.de/
Thank you. What is the status of getting these stats on python.org?
--
anatoly t.
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 12:40:35PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> Where can I find public reports with Python tests code coverage?
Here:
http://coverage.livinglogic.de/
--
Senthil
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.pytho
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Walter Dörwald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all!
>
> The code coverage site at http://coverage.livinglogic.de/ was broken for
> the last few months. It's fixed again now and runs the test suite once
> per day with
>
> regrtest.py -T -N -uurlfetch,largefile,
Titus Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 08:37:30AM -0400, Benji York wrote:
> -> Brett Cannon wrote:
> -> >But it does seem accurate; random checking of some modules that got high
> -> >but not perfect covereage all seem to be instances where dependency
> -> >injection would be required to
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 08:12:39PM -0700, Brett Cannon wrote:
-> On 6/15/06, Titus Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-> >
-> >Folks,
-> >
-> >I've just run a code coverage report for the python2.4 branch:
-> >
-> >http://vallista.idyll.org/~t/temp/python2.4-svn/
-> >
-> >This report uses my
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 08:37:30AM -0400, Benji York wrote:
-> Brett Cannon wrote:
-> >But it does seem accurate; random checking of some modules that got high
-> >but not perfect covereage all seem to be instances where dependency
-> >injection would be required to get the tests to work since th
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 02:21:04PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
-> Brett Cannon wrote:
-> >But it does seem accurate; random checking of some modules that got high
-> >but not perfect covereage all seem to be instances where dependency
-> >injection would be required to get the tests to work since
Brett Cannon wrote:
> Ah, do the union of the coverage! Yeah, that would be nice and give the
> most accurate coverage data in terms of what is actually being tested.
> But as Titus says in another email, question is how to get that data
> sent back to be correlated against.
It might be inter
On 6/19/06, Benji York <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Brett Cannon wrote:> But it does seem accurate; random checking of some modules that got high> but not perfect covereage all seem to be instances where dependency> injection would be required to get the tests to work since they were
> based on platf
Benji York wrote:
> Brett Cannon wrote:
>> But it does seem accurate; random checking of some modules that got high
>> but not perfect covereage all seem to be instances where dependency
>> injection would be required to get the tests to work since they were
>> based on platform-specific things
Brett Cannon wrote:
> But it does seem accurate; random checking of some modules that got high
> but not perfect covereage all seem to be instances where dependency
> injection would be required to get the tests to work since they were
> based on platform-specific things.
> I don't know if we n
Brett Cannon wrote:
> But it does seem accurate; random checking of some modules that got high
> but not perfect covereage all seem to be instances where dependency
> injection would be required to get the tests to work since they were
> based on platform-specific things.
There's something odd
On 6/15/06, Titus Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Folks,I've just run a code coverage report for the python2.4 branch:http://vallista.idyll.org/~t/temp/python2.4-svn/This report uses my figleaf code,
http://darcs.idyll.org/~t/projects/figleaf-latest.tar.gzVery nice, Titus!
I'm int
20 matches
Mail list logo
