On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 1:37 AM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Brett Cannon, 28.07.2011 23:49:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:25, Matt wrote:
- What policies are in place for keeping parity with other HTML
parsers (such as those in web browsers)?
There aren't any beyond it would be
Joao S. O. Bueno, 29.07.2011 13:22:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 1:37 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Brett Cannon, 28.07.2011 23:49:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:25, Matt wrote:
- What policies are in place for keeping parity with other HTML
parsers (such as those in web browsers)?
There aren't any
On Jul 29, 2011, at 7:46 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Joao S. O. Bueno, 29.07.2011 13:22:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 1:37 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Brett Cannon, 28.07.2011 23:49:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:25, Matt wrote:
- What policies are in place for keeping parity with other HTML
parsers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/29/2011 07:22 AM, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
I disaagree. Having proper html parsing out of the box is part of
the batteries included thing. And it is not a matter of having
html 5 - as stated on this thread, fixing it for html5 will fix it
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Glyph Lefkowitz
gl...@twistedmatrix.comwrote:
On Jul 29, 2011, at 7:46 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Joao S. O. Bueno, 29.07.2011 13:22:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 1:37 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Brett Cannon, 28.07.2011 23:49:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:25,
On Jul 29, 2011, at 3:00 PM, Matt wrote:
I don't see any real reason to drop a decent piece of code (HTMLParser, that
is) in favor of a third party library when only relatively minor updates are
needed to bring it up to speed with the latest spec.
I am not really one to throw stones here,
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:31, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/29/2011 07:22 AM, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
I disaagree. Having proper html parsing out of the box is part of
the batteries included thing. And it is not a matter of
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 13:16, Glyph Lefkowitz gl...@twistedmatrix.comwrote:
On Jul 29, 2011, at 3:00 PM, Matt wrote:
I don't see any real reason to drop a decent piece of code (HTMLParser,
that is) in favor of a third party library when only relatively minor
updates are needed to bring it
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 13:34:13 -0700
Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 13:16, Glyph Lefkowitz gl...@twistedmatrix.comwrote:
On Jul 29, 2011, at 3:00 PM, Matt wrote:
I don't see any real reason to drop a decent piece of code (HTMLParser,
that is) in favor of a
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:25, Matt mattba...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
I wanted to ask a few questions and start a discussion about HTML5
support within the HTMLParser class(es). Over on issue 670664, an
inconsistency with the way browsers and the HTMLParser parse script
and style tags
Brett Cannon, 28.07.2011 23:49:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:25, Matt wrote:
- What policies are in place for keeping parity with other HTML
parsers (such as those in web browsers)?
There aren't any beyond it would be nice.
[...]
It's more of an issue of someone caring enough to do the coding
11 matches
Mail list logo
