On 4 November 2017 at 09:52, Jelle Zijlstra wrote:
>
> 2017-11-03 16:44 GMT-07:00 Joao S. O. Bueno :
>>
>> This just popped up in Brython's issue tracker discussion:
>>
>> """
>> Pierre Quentel
>>
>> 04:57 (16 hours ago)
2017-11-04 0:44 GMT+01:00 Joao S. O. Bueno :
> This just popped up in Brython's issue tracker discussion:
>
> """
> Pierre Quentel
>
> 04:57 (16 hours ago)
> to brython-dev/br., Subscribed
>
> I think it's better to rename all occurences of async
2017-11-03 16:44 GMT-07:00 Joao S. O. Bueno :
> This just popped up in Brython's issue tracker discussion:
>
> """
> Pierre Quentel
>
> 04:57 (16 hours ago)
> to brython-dev/br., Subscribed
>
> I think it's better to rename all occurences of async
This just popped up in Brython's issue tracker discussion:
"""
Pierre Quentel
04:57 (16 hours ago)
to brython-dev/br., Subscribed
I think it's better to rename all occurences of async now, although
it's strange that :
there is currently no deprecation warning in
Maybe we should remove typing from the stdlib?
https://github.com/python/typing/issues/495
--
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
Terry Reedy writes:
> On 11/2/2017 4:54 AM, Lele Gaifax wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure if the rebase should have been done on the original branch
>> instead of creating a new one, or instead if I should open a new PR (and
>> close the original one?).
>
> It is normal to 'git merge
I will be happy to see PEP 544 and PEP 560 in Python 3.7, and maybe also
PEP 562 (if we decide on it and I will have time).
--
Ivan
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
On 11/1/2017 5:47 PM, Ned Deily wrote:
Happy belated Halloween to those who celebrate it; I hope it wasn't too scary!
Also possibly scary: we have just a little over 12 weeks remaining until Python
3.7's feature code cutoff, 2018-01-29. Those 12 weeks include a number of
traditional
On 11/2/2017 4:54 AM, Lele Gaifax wrote:
I'm not sure if the rebase should have been done on the original branch
instead of creating a new one, or instead if I should open a new PR (and close
the original one?).
It is normal to 'git merge upstream/master' after updating the master
branch and
> On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:47, Ned Deily wrote:
>
> Happy belated Halloween to those who celebrate it; I hope it wasn't too
> scary! Also possibly scary: we have just a little over 12 weeks remaining
> until Python 3.7's feature code cutoff, 2018-01-29. Those 12 weeks include a
Hi,
I'd like to know what should I do wrt to issue #27645 [1] and the related PR
#377 [2]: I think I fulfilled every requested item, and a month ago I rebased
the work [3] to solve the NEWS conflicts.
I'm not sure if the rebase should have been done on the original branch
instead of creating a
11 matches
Mail list logo