On 18.03.2011 07:15, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> A change that I made (a49bda5ff3d5) to the documentation 3 days ago does
> not appear to have propagated to
>
> http://docs.python.org/dev/library/multiprocessing.html
>
> Building the docs locally shows the change. Am I doing something wrong?
Nope, t
I get "unknown revision" (listing the full expression text) when using
Mercurial 1.6.3 (default version in Ubuntu 10.10).
Based on Baptiste's approach, I propose the script below to compute a
patch. Please report whether it works for you.
Regards,
Martin
#!/bin/sh
base=`hg log --template {re
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 17:06:50 +1100
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
> In contrast, timeit defaults to using time.time() under all operating
> systems other than Windows, and says:
>
> ...on Windows, clock() has microsecond granularity but
> time()'s granularity is 1/60th of a second; on Unix,
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 00:23, Terry Reedy wrote:
> People should retest their stuff with each micro
> (bugfix) release anyway.
That would be creating an insane burden on library developers.
Besides, I've so far not have things break between micro releases, it
must be very unusual.
That said, wh
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 7:28 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 3/17/2011 1:45 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
>>
>> 2011/3/16 Thomas Heller:
>>>
>>> I would like my committer rights to be retracted.
>>>
>>> I have been contributing to Python here and there for 10 years now,
>>> and it was a pleasant experi
On Mar 18, 2011, at 9:59 AM, Jesse Noller wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 7:28 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
>> On 3/17/2011 1:45 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
>>>
>>> 2011/3/16 Thomas Heller:
I would like my committer rights to be retracted.
I have been contributing to Python he
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 7:28 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
..
> In the meanwhile, it would be nice to have another ctypes maintainer, as
> there are several open issues. There is certainly a opening for a new person
> with C experience.
I am not ready to volunteer as maintainer, but if ctypes is not lis
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 10:18:06 -0400
Alexander Belopolsky wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 7:28 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> ..
> > In the meanwhile, it would be nice to have another ctypes maintainer, as
> > there are several open issues. There is certainly a opening for a new person
> > with C experi
Doug Hellmann wrote:
> On Mar 18, 2011, at 9:59 AM, Jesse Noller wrote:
>
> > Terry Reedy wrote:
> >> there are several open issues. There is certainly a opening for a new
> >> person
> >> with C experience.
> >
> > about on the PSF blog. Having another ctypes expert is pretty
> > critical (eve
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 20:00:29 +0100, Jesus Cea wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 17/03/11 14:45, R. David Murray wrote:
> > Not if the cpython repo is in a fully merged stated. And if it
> > isn't, I will wait until it is. (The update notifications on the
> > IRC ch
Just now I was trapped by the "Importing the main module twice" problem
for a while, and then I searched on web and go into here. It seems pretty
good to fix this problem, since it is really difficult to find out this
problem. Anyway, a module should not be initialized twice which results in
th
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2011-03-11 - 2011-03-18)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue.
Do NOT respond to this message.
Issues counts and deltas:
open2723 (+14)
closed 20655 (+115)
total 23378 (+129)
Open issues w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18/03/11 01:01, Larry Hastings wrote:
> In 2.7.1 PyCObject_FromVoidPtr() now calls PyErr_WarnPy3k(). This means
> it's been promoted to throwing DeprecationWarning! But that's also
> guarded with Py_Py3kWarningFlag so it's not active unless you as
On 3/18/2011 10:48 AM, Senthil Kumaran wrote:
Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Mar 18, 2011, at 9:59 AM, Jesse Noller wrote:
Terry Reedy wrote:
there are several open issues. There is certainly a opening for a new person
with C experience.
about on the PSF blog. Having another ctypes expert is pret
Some of those who are relative new to regexes sometimes ask how to write
a regex which checks that a number is in a range or is a valid date.
Although this may be possible, it certainly isn't easy.
From what I've read, Perl has a way of including code in a regex, but I
don't think that's a goo
On 3/18/2011 10:17 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Is there a "job description" for a ctypes maintainer?
I would say a knowledge of C and C implementations, a tolerance of OS
idiosyncrasies, and an interest bridging C to Python and in particular
the way ctpes does it. (I intentionally omitted gener
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>> But seriously, I think an additional function or additional flag in the
>> current functions/method in the parse module is sufficient than going
>> for another module.
>
> I vote for a new function, not a flag. (Others can explain my rule
On 03/18/2011 11:20 AM, Jesus Cea wrote:
I kind of remember doing this change myself. Since no 2.8 is planned, it
seemed sensible to mark PyCObject as a py3k warning.
It's all fine by me, and yeah I think you did the change. I'm sure it
wasn't me.
PS: I am the maintainer of (externally de
Probably best discussed on python-ideas...
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 4:04 PM, MRAB wrote:
> Some of those who are relative new to regexes sometimes ask how to write a
> regex which checks that a number is in a range or is a valid date. Although
> this may be possible, it certainly isn't easy.
>
> F
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>>> But seriously, I think an additional function or additional flag in the
>>> current functions/method in the parse module is sufficient than going
>>> for another module.
>>
>> I vot
On Mar 18, 2011, at 8:41 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Really. Do they still call them URIs? :-)
Well, by RFC 398*7* they're calling them IRIs instead. 'irilib', perhaps? ;-)
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/ma
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 08:57:42PM -0400, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote:
> Well, by RFC 398*7* they're calling them IRIs instead. 'irilib', perhaps? ;-)
Yes, and it involves huge lot of unicode character handling /parsing
rules in Resource Indentifiers. 'irilib' sounds like a good plan.
--
Senthil
___
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 5:00 AM, Jesus Cea wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 17/03/11 14:45, R. David Murray wrote:
>> Not if the cpython repo is in a fully merged stated. And if it
>> isn't, I will wait until it is. (The update notifications on the
>> IRC channel h
Tres Seaver wrote:
I'm not even sure why you would want __version__ in 99% of modules: in
the ordinary cases, a module's version should be either the Python
version (for a module shipped in the stdlib), or the release of the
distribution which shipped it.
It's useful to be able to find out th
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 7:28 PM, Greg Ewing wrote:
> Tres Seaver wrote:
>
>> I'm not even sure why you would want __version__ in 99% of modules: in
>> the ordinary cases, a module's version should be either the Python
>> version (for a module shipped in the stdlib), or the release of the
>> distr
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 1:04 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I don't want to be alarmist and I don't want to start another
> moratorium, but I do think that we need to be aware of people coming
> in "sideways" into Python 3 and missing the nice deprecations. So
> let's be conservative with deprecati
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 12:48 AM, Senthil Kumaran wrote:
> I am the only one who is finding the following phrases amusing?!
>
> - "opening for a new person"
> - "another ctypes expert is pretty critical"
> - "job description"
> - "send people to.."
Come join python-dev - we have plenty of jobs th
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 5:44 AM, Raymond Hettinger
wrote:
>
> You will be missed.
> Thanks for all your efforts.
Indeed!
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.or
Hello
Will it be okay to make you nosy on a bug report to ask for an expert
opinion when the current developers need it? If yes, I’ll mark your
name as “retired” in the experts file, if not I’ll remove it.
Thanks for your contributions, and have fun in your next adventures!
[Alexander]
> Unfort
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 07:40:43PM -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 7:28 PM, Greg Ewing
> wrote:
> > Tres Seaver wrote:
> >
> >> I'm not even sure why you would want __version__ in 99% of modules: in
> >> the ordinary cases, a module's version should be either the Python
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 19/03/11 03:14, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> What may actually be better for buildbot experimentation purposes is
> to allow us to request running a build-and-test cycle from branches in
> *any* of the repositories hosted on hg.python.org, rather than havi
> The short summary is that the Parrot VM is a very good semantic fit for
> Python (AFAICT, a better fit than it is for Perl 6, though I haven't
> done the feature-by-feature comparison).
Thanks for the write-up. The point quoted above is especially useful,
since I vaguely remembered reading th
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Jesus Cea wrote:
> This is a good suggestion. I kind of remember that when working in SVN
> you could request a particular build from a particular branch. If that
> was true, we should consider something similar with mercurial. I am
> offline and can't check, thoug
> I did just poke around on the buildbot pages, but couldn't find
> anything resembling the old "buiild a branch" form.
>
> MvL/Antoine/Georg, any ideas?
Kelsey Hightower is already working on it. There is the buildbot 'try'
feature, but there may be other options as well.
Regards,
Martin
__
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 06:43, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> I posted my rough notes and additional write-ups for Wednesday's VM
> summit and Thursday's language summit:
>
> http://www.boredomandlaziness.org/2011/03/python-vm-summit-rough-notes.html
>
> http://www.boredomandlaziness.org/2011/03/python-vm
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 07:40:43PM -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 7:28 PM, Greg Ewing
>> wrote:
>> > Tres Seaver wrote:
>> >
>> >> I'm not even sure why you would want __version__ in 99% of modules: in
>> >> th
The timing of these new refleaks being triggered by test_os and by
test_posix is suspicious, making me think that #10812 is the likely
culprit.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Hi all,
During the huge thread about PEP 394, a suggestion was made that a
"launcher" for Python on Windows could be implemented which would allow
for some of the guidelines in that PEP to apply to the Windows version
of Python.
I've attached the first draft of a PEP for such a launcher and
38 matches
Mail list logo
