On 12 July 2013 13:27, Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 2:11 AM, Steve Dower steve.do...@microsoft.com
wrote:
+1. And maybe amend PEP 11 to specify whose extended support phase does
not expire within 6 months of release? (I picked 6 for no particular
reason.)
On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 22:28:49 -0400
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 13:49:54 +1200, Ben Hoyt benh...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess it has to be dropped at some stage, but with Windows XP it's a case
of XP is dead. Long live XP! There are still an awful lot of XP
Am 12.07.2013 03:49, schrieb Ben Hoyt:
I guess it has to be dropped at some stage, but with Windows XP it's a
case of XP is dead. Long live XP! There are still an awful lot of XP
boxes out there, and I'd kind hate to see support dropped completely. We
still use it here at home.
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 6:58 PM, Christian Heimes christ...@python.org wrote:
For Python 3.4 is going to be a very close call. According to PEP 429
3.4.0 final is scheduled for February 22, 2014. The extended support
phase of Windows XP ends merely 45 days later on April 8, 2014. Do we
really
You underestimate the reach of XP. For older or underpowered hardware
outside the developed world it is still the de facto choice. And it
definitely is the best version of Windows ever. None of the Win98 crap and
none of the Vista junk.
Telling people to go install Ubuntu is not really fair if
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2013-07-05 - 2013-07-12)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue.
Do NOT respond to this message.
Issues counts and deltas:
open4067 ( -5)
closed 26140 (+74)
total 30207 (+69)
Open issues
On 7/12/2013 8:50 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
You underestimate the reach of XP. For older or underpowered hardware
outside the developed world it is still the de facto choice. And it
definitely is the best version of Windows ever. None of the Win98 crap
and none of the Vista junk.
Telling
Sorry for the delay; work got in the way.
On 07Jul2013 15:21, Victor Stinner victor.stin...@gmail.com wrote:
| Ok, I think that the best consensus here is to add a new
| os.set_blocking() function. The function would not be available on
| Windows, but should be available on all UNIX platforms.
On Feb 27, 2013 4:31 AM, Michael Foord fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk wrote:
On 27 Feb 2013, at 11:00, David Beazley d...@dabeaz.com wrote:
From: Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com
I'll be the first one to admit that pycparser is almost certainly not
generally useful enough to be exposed in
On 7/13/2013 12:10 AM, Eric Snow wrote:
On Feb 27, 2013 4:31 AM, Michael Foord fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk
+1 PLY is capable and well tried-and-tested. We used it in Resolver
One to implement a pretty large grammar and it is (in my opinion) best
of breed in the Python parser generator world.
David Beasley; see earlier in this same thread:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-February/thread.html#124389
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 9:41 PM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
On 7/13/2013 12:10 AM, Eric Snow wrote:
On Feb 27, 2013 4:31 AM, Michael Foord
11 matches
Mail list logo
