On 6 August 2015 at 15:04, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6 August 2015 at 09:29, Victor Stinner victor.stin...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 5 août 2015 17:12, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com a écrit :
A hard dependency on wheel wouldn't fit into the same category - when
folks are using a
Bitbucket has a mirror of cpython, here:
https://bitbucket.org/mirror/cpython
It was last updated on May 7 and still says it's Python 3.5.0a4.
It's not clear to me who owns the mirror account--is it Atlassian
themselves? Anyway it'd be nice if it were, y'know, fresher.
//arry/
On 7 August 2015 at 03:28, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
On Aug 6, 2015, at 5:04 AM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
Yes: but the logic chain from 'its a bad idea' to 'we don't include
wheel but we do include setuptools' is the bit I'm having a hard time
with.
In
On 6 August 2015 at 19:04, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
On 6 August 2015 at 15:04, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
When I consider the harm to a production pipeline that using
setuptools can cause (in that it triggers easy_install, and
easy_install has AFAIK none of
On Aug 6, 2015, at 5:04 AM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
Yes: but the logic chain from 'its a bad idea' to 'we don't include
wheel but we do include setuptools' is the bit I'm having a hard time
with.
In my opinion, it’s the severity of how crippled their experience is
