On 28 August 2015 at 00:25, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> I'd suggest including a clearer motivation there:
>
> Note: The asyncio package has been included in the standard
> library on a provisional basis, and thus may gain new APIs and
> capabilities in maintenance releases as it matures. Backwards
>
Hi,
2015-08-27 23:15 GMT+02:00 Yury Selivanov :
> Recently, in an asyncio related issue [1], Guido said that new features
> for asyncio have to wait till 3.6, since asyncio is no longer a provisional
> package. (...)
> For example, there is an issue [2] to add starttls support to asyncio.
> (...)
I think this is a packaging problem.
In an ideal world, Python would ship some version of asyncio, but you would
also be able to pip install a newer version into your virtual environment,
and it would override the version in stdlib.
As it stands now, however, if you pip install another version of
On 28 August 2015 at 10:46, Gustavo Carneiro wrote:
> I think this is a packaging problem.
>
> In an ideal world, Python would ship some version of asyncio, but you would
> also be able to pip install a newer version into your virtual environment,
> and it would override the version in stdlib.
>
>
On August 28, 2015 at 6:36:21 AM, Paul Moore (p.f.mo...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On 28 August 2015 at 10:46, Gustavo Carneiro wrote:
> > I think this is a packaging problem.
> >
> > In an ideal world, Python would ship some version of asyncio, but you would
> > also be able to pip install a newer versio
Victor,
On 2015-08-28 5:01 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
Hi,
2015-08-27 23:15 GMT+02:00 Yury Selivanov :
Recently, in an asyncio related issue [1], Guido said that new features
for asyncio have to wait till 3.6, since asyncio is no longer a provisional
package. (...)
For example, there is an issue
On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 at 08:35 Yury Selivanov wrote:
> Victor,
>
> On 2015-08-28 5:01 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > 2015-08-27 23:15 GMT+02:00 Yury Selivanov :
> >> Recently, in an asyncio related issue [1], Guido said that new features
> >> for asyncio have to wait till 3.6, since asyn
2015-08-28 17:44 GMT+02:00 Brett Cannon :
> Ultimately it's Larry's call, but I don't see why we couldn't. If we were
> talking about something as low-level as the urllib package then I would
> agree, but beyond its own tests is there anything in the stdlib that depends
> on asyncio?
At the beginn
2015-08-28 17:34 GMT+02:00 Yury Selivanov :
> I too would enjoy more frequent release schedule of asyncio.
The problem is also to allow users to upgrade easily asyncio to
retrieve new features, or simply latest bug fixes. As explained in
other emails, if asyncio is part of the stlidb, it's *not* p
On August 28, 2015 at 12:01:25 PM, Victor Stinner (victor.stin...@gmail.com)
wrote:
> 2015-08-28 17:34 GMT+02:00 Yury Selivanov :
> > I too would enjoy more frequent release schedule of asyncio.
>
> The problem is also to allow users to upgrade easily asyncio to
> retrieve new features, or simply
2015-08-28 18:02 GMT+02:00 Donald Stufft :
> Unless we fix the sys.path ordering to make it possible.
The problem is the deadline: Python 3.5 final is scheduled for the
September, 13. We have 2 weeks to decide what to do with asyncio.
I don't think that it's a good idea to modify how sys.path is
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2015-08-21 - 2015-08-28)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue.
Do NOT respond to this message.
Issues counts and deltas:
open5042 (+29)
closed 31671 (+15)
total 36713 (+44)
Open issues wit
On August 28, 2015 at 12:07:48 PM, Victor Stinner (victor.stin...@gmail.com)
wrote:
> 2015-08-28 18:02 GMT+02:00 Donald Stufft :
> > Unless we fix the sys.path ordering to make it possible.
>
> The problem is the deadline: Python 3.5 final is scheduled for the
> September, 13. We have 2 weeks to
On 2015-08-28 11:44 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
Unfortunately, separating it from the standard library is something
that I don't think we can do so late in the 3.5 release candidates
process.
Ultimately it's Larry's call, but I don't see why we couldn't. If we
were talking about somet
On 28 August 2015 at 17:11, Yury Selivanov wrote:
> On 2015-08-28 11:44 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
>>
>> Unfortunately, separating it from the standard library is something
>> that I don't think we can do so late in the 3.5 release candidates
>> process.
>>
>>
>> Ultimately it's Larry'
On 29 August 2015 at 04:44, Gustavo Carneiro wrote:
> On 28 August 2015 at 17:11, Yury Selivanov wrote:
>>
>> On 2015-08-28 11:44 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, separating it from the standard library is something
>>> that I don't think we can do so late in the 3.5 rel
16 matches
Mail list logo
