Re: [Python-Dev] C99

2016-10-06 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 10:10 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: [...] > And in practice this almost certainly doesn't matter -- the only > reason people jump through hoops to get gcc 4.8 is for its improved > C++ support. I just tried my c99 test file on CentOS 5's default gcc > 4.1 and

Re: [Python-Dev] C99

2016-10-06 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 8:02 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 6 August 2016 at 12:15, Steve Dower wrote: >> FYI, it's MSVC 14.0 (which is included in VS 2015). >> >> Personally I'd like to see it restricted to the common subset of C99 and >> some version of

Re: [Python-Dev] C99

2016-10-06 Thread Michael Felt
On 04-Jun-16 10:12, Sebastian Krause wrote: Sounds good for features that are well-supported by compilers that >people use. (Are there other compilers used than just GCC and MSVC?) Just thought I'd mention that "little ole me" is using IBM vac on AIX rather than gcc. This has more to do with