Hi,
On 23/05/17 17:54, Guido van Rossum wrote:
I think the I inevitable conclusion is"thanks, but no thanks."
Can I ask why this the inevitable conclusion? The Python Foundation make
packages for Windows and macOS, why not snaps for Linux?
On May 23, 2017 8:05 AM, "Martin Wimpress"
mailto:
Hi Ben,
I am not convinced that combining operations will have a significant impact
in term of performance. Mark Shanon implemented that in his HotPy project.
I proposed a RETURN_NONE opcode to combine LOAD_CONST with RETURN_VALUE.
The issue was rejected because I failed to show any speedup.
htt
On Tue, 23 May 2017 23:09:31 -0500
Victor Stinner wrote:
> Le 23 mai 2017 20:43, "David Wilson" a écrit :
> In which case, what is to prevent Requests from just depending on
>
> pyOpenSSL as usual?
>
>
> From what I heard, pyOpenSSL development is slowing down, so I'm not sure
> that it's real
On Wed, 24 May 2017 23:31:47 +0200
Ivan Levkivskyi wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After collecting suggestions in the previous discussion on python-dev
> https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-March/thread.html#147629
> and playing with implementation, here is an updated version of PEP 544.
>
Le 25 mai 2017 1:26 PM, "Antoine Pitrou" a écrit :
System admins can add the company CA at the system level in the
system's CA cert store, they have no need for a Python API.
If I understood correctly, since the Python ssl module is unable to load
system CAs (at least on Python 2.7) on Windows
On 25 May 2017 at 21:24, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> The new TLS API wouldn't significantly improve security. It's just a
> different API.
It isn't just a different API. It's an API with *backends for the
native TLS implementations on WIndows and Mac OS X*.
This means that instead of attempting to
On 25 May 2017 at 20:32, Martin Wimpress wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 23/05/17 17:54, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>>
>> I think the I inevitable conclusion is"thanks, but no thanks."
>
>
> Can I ask why this the inevitable conclusion? The Python Foundation make
> packages for Windows and macOS, why not snaps f
On 25 May 2017 at 21:26, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Wed, 24 May 2017 23:31:47 +0200
> Ivan Levkivskyi wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After collecting suggestions in the previous discussion on python-dev
>> https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-March/thread.html#147629
>> and playing with i
Thanks, Victor. That's very helpful. So RETURN_NONE (and probably
RETURN_SMALL_CONST) are not worth it, based on your empirical tests. Your
patch shows how (relatively) straight-forward it is to test out new opcodes.
I'm still optimistic about the value of COMPARE_IS_NONE and
COMPARE_IS_NOT_NONE,
2017-05-25 7:19 GMT-07:00 Nick Coghlan :
> On 25 May 2017 at 21:26, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 May 2017 23:31:47 +0200
> > Ivan Levkivskyi wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> After collecting suggestions in the previous discussion on python-dev
> >> https://mail.python.org/pipermail/pyth
Hola python-dev,
Thanks to Larry and Barry, I was able to sit in on the Python Language
Summit again this year. The start of the coverage for that is now
available.
The starting point is the overview article, here:
https://lwn.net/Articles/723251/ (for non-subscribers, this link will
get around
Hi Ben,
for what you're interested in, you might give a look at WPython 1.0 (
https://code.google.com/archive/p/wpython/downloads ) and 1.1 (
https://code.google.com/archive/p/wpython2/downloads ), but they cover a
lot of optimizations (as you can see from a brief look at the slides):
RETURN_CONST
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 7:03 AM, Jake Edge wrote:
>
> Hola python-dev,
>
> Thanks to Larry and Barry, I was able to sit in on the Python Language
> Summit again this year. The start of the coverage for that is now
> available.
>
> [snipped]
>
> Hopefully I captured things reasonably well -- if yo
On May 25, 2017, at 08:03 AM, Jake Edge wrote:
>Thanks to Larry and Barry, I was able to sit in on the Python Language
>Summit again this year. The start of the coverage for that is now
>available.
Thanks so much for your always excellent reporting Jake. It's unfortunate
that we can't invite ev
On 24/05/17 14:31, Ivan Levkivskyi wrote:
Hi all,
After collecting suggestions in the previous discussion on python-dev
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-March/thread.html#147629
and playing with implementation, here is an updated version of PEP 544.
--
Ivan
I really like this
On 25/05/17 03:47, Victor Stinner wrote:
Hi Ben,
I am not convinced that combining operations will have a significant
impact in term of performance. Mark Shanon implemented that in his HotPy
project.
I don't think that I did ;)
HotPy implemented a trace-based optimising interpreter, that pre
Thanks Jake!
I'm laughing at not being in the photo. That must've happened soon after I
left the room as I disappeared a tad early. I'll pretend I'm hiding behind
Brett or Thomas. ;)
-gps
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 10:34 AM Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On May 25, 2017, at 08:03 AM, Jake Edge wrote:
>
After reading Cesare Di Mauro's email, I realized that I was thinking to
WPython in fact...
Victor
Le 25 mai 2017 8:11 PM, "Mark Shannon" a écrit :
>
>
> On 25/05/17 03:47, Victor Stinner wrote:
>
>> Hi Ben,
>>
>> I am not convinced that combining operations will have a significant
>> impact in
On 2017-05-25 22:16, Gregory P. Smith wrote:
Thanks Jake!
I'm laughing at not being in the photo. That must've happened soon after
I left the room as I disappeared a tad early. I'll pretend I'm hiding
behind Brett or Thomas. ;)
> -gps
>
Or someone could Photoshop you in. :-)
On Thu, May
19 matches
Mail list logo
