On 24.04.19 18:02, Victor Stinner wrote:
> Hum, I found issues with libpython: C extensions are explicitly linked
> to libpython built in release mode. So a debug python loading a C
> extension may load libpython in release mode, whereas libpython in
> debug mode is already loaded.
>
> When
On 2019-04-25 00:24, Petr Viktorin wrote:
PEP 590 defines a new simple/fast protocol for its users, and instead of
making existing complexity faster and easier to use, it's left to be
deprecated/phased out (or kept in existing classes for backwards
compatibility). It makes it possible for future
You don't necessarily need rpath actually. The Linux loader has a
bug/feature where once it has successfully loaded a library with a given
soname, then any future requests for that soname within the same process
will automatically return that same library, regardless of rpath settings
etc. So as
On 24.04.19 01:44, Victor Stinner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Two weeks ago, I started a thread "No longer enable Py_TRACE_REFS by
> default in debug build", but I lost myself in details, I forgot the
> main purpose of my proposal...
>
> Let me retry from scratch with a more explicit title: I would like to
On 25.04.19 08:31, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> You don't necessarily need rpath actually. The Linux loader has a
> bug/feature where once it has successfully loaded a library with a given
> soname, then any future requests for that soname within the same process
> will automatically return that same
Le jeu. 25 avr. 2019 à 09:30, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> the purpose of python-config here is not clear. Whether it's intended to be
> used
> for linking extensions, or embedded interpreters. Currently you are using the
> same for both use cases.
My PR 12946 removes libpython from distutils,
I looked how fonforge gets compiler and linker flags to embed Python:
it seems like to "pkg-config --libs python-2.7" which returns
"-lpython2.7". My PR doesn't change Misc/python.pc. Should I modify
Misc/python.pc as well... or not? :-) I'm not used to pkg-config. I
don't know if it's common that
Hi,
I'm now convinced that C extensions must *not* be linked to libpython on Unix.
I wrote PR 12946:
https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/12946
bpo-21536: C extensions are no longer linked to libpython
On Unix, C extensions are no longer linked to libpython.
It is now possible
On 25.04.19 13:26, Victor Stinner wrote:
> I looked how fonforge gets compiler and linker flags to embed Python:
> it seems like to "pkg-config --libs python-2.7" which returns
> "-lpython2.7". My PR doesn't change Misc/python.pc. Should I modify
> Misc/python.pc as well... or not? :-) I'm not
On 25.04.19 13:14, Victor Stinner wrote:
> Le jeu. 25 avr. 2019 à 09:34, Matthias Klose a écrit :
>> there's a simple solution: apt install python3-numpy-dbg cython3-dbg ;) So
>> depending on the package maintainer, you already have that available, but it
>> is
>> extra maintenance cost.
Le jeu. 25 avr. 2019 à 09:34, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> there's a simple solution: apt install python3-numpy-dbg cython3-dbg ;) So
> depending on the package maintainer, you already have that available, but it
> is
> extra maintenance cost. Simplifying that would be a good idea.
Fedora
On 2019-04-25 00:24, Petr Viktorin wrote:
I believe we can achieve
that by having PEP 590's (o+offset) point not just to function pointer,
but to a {function pointer; flags} struct with flags defined for two
optimizations:
What's the rationale for putting the flags in the instance? Do you
On 4/25/19 5:12 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2019-04-25 00:24, Petr Viktorin wrote:
PEP 590 defines a new simple/fast protocol for its users, and instead of
making existing complexity faster and easier to use, it's left to be
deprecated/phased out (or kept in existing classes for backwards
Hi core devs,
there are several core dev events happening at the US PyCon this year, so I
was wondering if we could organise something similar at EuroPython. Does
anyone have any plans or ideas already? And, how many of us are planning to
attend EP19 in Basel this year? Unless there's something
Hi,
I want to come to EP this year, but didn't register yet, is registration
already open?
--
Ivan
On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 at 15:01, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Hi core devs,
>
> there are several core dev events happening at the US PyCon this year, so I
> was wondering if we could organise
On 4/25/19 10:42 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2019-04-25 00:24, Petr Viktorin wrote:
I believe we can achieve
that by having PEP 590's (o+offset) point not just to function pointer,
but to a {function pointer; flags} struct with flags defined for two
optimizations:
What's the rationale for
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 1:01 AM Stefan Behnel wrote:
> there are several core dev events happening at the US PyCon this year, so I
> was wondering if we could organise something similar at EuroPython. Does
> anyone have any plans or ideas already? And, how many of us are planning to
> attend EP19
17 matches
Mail list logo
