It's held up on SSL. Ubuntu 20.04 changed some security parameter
tunings, which breaks some uses of the SSL module, and approximately
eight modules in the test suite. I assume this wasn't caught on the
buildbots because they don't use Ubuntu--or at least not a build that
fresh. SSL and t
On 04.07.2020 10:01, Larry Hastings wrote:
It's held up on SSL. Ubuntu 20.04 changed some security parameter tunings, which breaks some uses of the SSL module, and approximately
eight modules in the test suite. I assume this wasn't caught on the buildbots because they don't use Ubuntu--or
On Sat, 4 Jul 2020 00:01:56 -0700
Larry Hastings wrote:
> It's held up on SSL. Ubuntu 20.04 changed some security parameter
> tunings, which breaks some uses of the SSL module, and approximately
> eight modules in the test suite. I assume this wasn't caught on the
> buildbots because they don
On Sat, 4 Jul 2020 13:16:50 +0200
Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Jul 2020 00:01:56 -0700
> Larry Hastings wrote:
> > It's held up on SSL. Ubuntu 20.04 changed some security parameter
> > tunings, which breaks some uses of the SSL module, and approximately
> > eight modules in the test suite
Python 3.5.9 has the same problems on Ubuntu 20.04 as 3.5.10.
//arry/
On 7/4/20 4:53 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Sat, 4 Jul 2020 13:16:50 +0200
Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Sat, 4 Jul 2020 00:01:56 -0700
Larry Hastings wrote:
It's held up on SSL. Ubuntu 20.04 changed some security paramete
@Inada-sama: For RFC conformance to S&W, see footnote [3] at the end.
MRAB writes:
> If you believe you have something important to say, then at least
> say it clearly.
Indeed -- that commit log is an example of the kind of writing the
reference to Strunk & White was intended to reduce; repeti
MRAB writes:
> It's also like saying that you shouldn't split infinitives
Amusingly, Strunk (1918) was perfectly happy with split infinitives,
though he noted it centered whiteness. (Obviously he didn't put it
that way, more along the lines of "some people will look down on
you.") In general,
Greg Ewing writes:
> On 4/07/20 4:33 am, Jim J. Jewett wrote:
> > If Bob and Alice seem neutral to you, would you do a double-take
> > on Kehinde or Oladotun?
>
> Maybe we should use randomly generated names for hypothetical
> persons?
Randomly generated according to what character repertoi
On 2020-07-04 05:51, Greg Ewing wrote:
On 4/07/20 4:33 am, Jim J. Jewett wrote:
If Bob and Alice seem neutral to you, would you do a double-take on Kehinde or
Oladotun?
Maybe we should use randomly generated names for hypothetical persons?
Ideally they should be short names, one or two syll
On 2020-07-04 16:23, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
@Inada-sama: For RFC conformance to S&W, see footnote [3] at the end.
MRAB writes:
> If you believe you have something important to say, then at least
> say it clearly.
Indeed -- that commit log is an example of the kind of writing the
refere
On Sat, 4 Jul 2020 at 17:48, MRAB wrote:
>
> On 2020-07-04 05:51, Greg Ewing wrote:
> > On 4/07/20 4:33 am, Jim J. Jewett wrote:
> >> If Bob and Alice seem neutral to you, would you do a double-take on
> >> Kehinde or Oladotun?
> >
> > Maybe we should use randomly generated names for hypothetical
On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 05:51:04PM +0100, MRAB wrote:
I'd also add: Try to avoid regionalisms; aim for a
broadly "international" form of the language. Some
How do you spell "regionalism"?
Martin
PS: Irony intended
___
Python-Dev mailing list -- pyt
On 2020-07-04 19:23, Paul Moore wrote:
On Sat, 4 Jul 2020 at 17:48, MRAB wrote:
>
> On 2020-07-04 05:51, Greg Ewing wrote:
> > On 4/07/20 4:33 am, Jim J. Jewett wrote:
> >> If Bob and Alice seem neutral to you, would you do a double-take on
Kehinde or Oladotun?
> >
> > Maybe we should use ran
On 2020-07-04 21:07, Martin Dengler wrote:
On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 05:51:04PM +0100, MRAB wrote:
>I'd also add: Try to avoid regionalisms; aim for a
>broadly "international" form of the language. Some
How do you spell "regionalism"?
Martin
PS: Irony intended
As far as I'm aware, there's o
On 5/07/20 3:26 am, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Greg Ewing writes:
> Maybe we should use randomly generated names for hypothetical
> persons?
Randomly generated according to what character repertoire and lexical
rules (I'm not talking about British v. American)?
Randomly selected ones!
--
Thank you for this PEP! Pattern matching is really exciting.
As the PEP mentions and the thread evidences, the current dot syntax for
the “constant value pattern” is a tricky point. Given this, I thought I’d
throw another suggestion into the bikeshed.
Use percent placeholder to indicate lookup (o
Thank you for this PEP! Pattern matching is really exciting.
As the PEP mentions and the thread evidences, the current dot syntax for
the “constant value pattern” is a tricky point. Given this, I thought I’d
throw another suggestion into the bikeshed.
Use percent placeholder to indicate lookup (o
I don't see how this extrapolates to arbitrary, extended match
expressions? You're proposing a slightly more flexible switch, which match
is only intended to be as the most basic case. Even if you purely swapped
it out with any the various proposals for identifying a constant vs a
target, it's sti
On 5/07/20 8:23 am, MRAB wrote:
On 2020-07-04 19:23, Paul Moore wrote:
Surely the obvious thing to do would be to use Monty Python characters?
True, but if they were all called Eric it could be confusing.
Also the Monty Python team were all white, so it wouldn't
really solve the problem.
--
On 5/07/20 8:30 am, MRAB wrote:
On 2020-07-04 21:07, Martin Dengler wrote:
How do you spell "regionalism"?
As far as I'm aware, there's only one way to spell it,
I suppose there could be some planet where it's spelled
"regionalizm".
--
Greg
___
Pyt
On 5/07/20 3:24 am, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Amusingly, Strunk (1918) was perfectly happy with split infinitives,
though he noted it centered whiteness. (Obviously he didn't put it
that way, more along the lines of "some people will look down on
you.")
Um... what?
Are you saying that people
On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 5:37 PM Greg Ewing
wrote:
> On 5/07/20 3:24 am, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> > Amusingly, Strunk (1918) was perfectly happy with split infinitives,
> > though he noted it centered whiteness. (Obviously he didn't put it
> > that way, more along the lines of "some people wil
Apologies if I misunderstand anything, but my suggestion was just an
alternative to the dot syntax for constant value patterns (which along with
literal patterns are how PEP 622’s proposes to to cover the “more flexible
switch” use case).
This syntax is more verbose than PEP 622’s dot syntax for i
On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 12:03 PM Shantanu Jain wrote:
> - Finally, I did mention increasing the scope of constant value patterns to
> accommodate expressions (as opposed to just dotted names). If we were to do
> this, it’s a reason to prefer some syntaxes for constant value patterns over
> other
Caveats:
- Any expression (unless you allow reference to variables previously bound
by the match statement) can just be aliased (as long as you don’t need
short circuiting), so it’s not a critical feature. Constant value patterns
are the most easily replaceable by if/elif part of PEP 622.
- I’m sur
Hi, folks.
After 3.9 becomes beta, I am searching deprecated APIs we can remove
in Python 3.10.
I want to share how I am checking how the API is not used.
Please teach me if you know an easy and better approach to find
deprecated API usage.
## Sourcegraph
Github code search is not powerful enou
26 matches
Mail list logo
