(For the record, I’m not replying as a PSF Director in this; I haven’t
discussed this with the rest of the Board yet. This just comes from the
Steering Council.)
The Steering Council discussed this proposal in our weekly meeting, last
week. It's a complicated subject with a lot of different facets
Hello,
On Wed, 4 Nov 2020 13:27:50 +0100
Thomas Wouters wrote:
>
> And it may not be immediately obvious from Mark's plans, but as far as we
> can tell, the proposal is for speeding up pure-Python code. It will do
> little for code that is hampered, speed-wise, by CPython's object model, or
>
On Wed, 4 Nov 2020 at 13:14, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> On Wed, 4 Nov 2020 13:27:50 +0100
> Thomas Wouters wrote:
> >
> > And it may not be immediately obvious from Mark's plans, but as far as we
> > can tell, the proposal is for speeding up pure-Python code. It will do
> > little for code that is
Hi,
Currently, building a wheel packaging on Python 3.10 fails with:
AssertionError: would build wheel with unsupported tag ('cp310',
'cp310', 'linux_x86_64')
This bug is discussed in many places:
* PEP 641 -- Using an underscore in the version portion of Python 3.10
compatibility tags
ht
Hi Thomas,
I have to assume that this isn't a rejection of my proposal, since I
haven't actually made a proposal to the SC yet :)
Thanks for the feedback though, it's very valuable to know the SC's
thinking on this matter.
I have a few comments inline below.
On 04/11/2020 12:27 pm, Thomas
On Tue., 3 Nov. 2020, 8:07 am Ethan Furman, wrote:
> On 11/2/20 1:52 PM, Glenn Linderman wrote:
> > On 11/2/2020 1:42 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> >> But we feel that `case x, x` can easily be misunderstood as "a tuple of
> two equal values"
> >
> > So what _is_ the syntax for "a tuple of two eq
