Sorry, I didn't mean to mislead. I wrote easily - I guess using the
current textwrap.dedent isn't really hard, but still, writing:
import textwrap
r = some_func(textwrap.dedent('''\
line1
line2'''))
Seems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I read the developer's FAQ and the output of svn up --help. Executing
svn up or svn info tells me I'm already at rev 41430, which is the
latest rev, right? Creating a fresh build subdirectory followed by
configure and make gives me this error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there some magic required to check out new files from the repository?
I'm trying to build on the trunk and am getting compilation errors about
code.h not being found. If I remember correctly, this is a new file brought
over from the ast branch. Using cvs I would
Hi all,
I've been using Python for a few years and, as of a few days ago,
finally decided to put the effort into contributing code back to the
project.
I'm attempting to implement PEP 341 (unification of try/except and
try/finally) against HEAD. However, this being my first attempt at a
Thomas Lee wrote:
Hi all,
I've been using Python for a few years and, as of a few days ago,
finally decided to put the effort into contributing code back to the
project.
I'm attempting to implement PEP 341 (unification of try/except and
try/finally) against HEAD. However, this being
../Objects/frameobject.c:6:18: code.h: No such file or directory
Sure enough, I have no code.h in my Include directory.
Fredrik what does
Fredrik svn status Include/code.h
Fredrik say? if it says
It reports nothing.
Fredrik doing a full
Fredrik
On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Before I wipe out Include and svn up again is there any debugging I can do
for someone smarter in the ways of Subversion than me? Regarding my
[...]
Output of the svnversion command? That shows switched and locally
modified files, etc.
I'm
Martin code.h should live in Include. It was originally committed to
Martin CVS, so it is in the subversion repository from day one; it
Martin should always have been there since you started using
Martin subversion.
Sorry, I had some strange idea it was new with the ast branch.
John Output of the svnversion command? That shows switched and locally
John modified files, etc.
John I'm not an svn guru, but I find that command useful, especially to
John point out when I switched some deep directory then forgot about
John it.
Thanks, I'll remember it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin code.h should live in Include. It was originally committed to
Martin CVS, so it is in the subversion repository from day one; it
Martin should always have been there since you started using
Martin subversion.
Sorry, I had some strange idea it
Michiel Jan Laurens de Hoon wrote:
I have an extension module for scientific visualization. This extension
module opens one or more windows, in which plots can be made. Something
similar to the plotting capabilities of Matlab.
For the graphics windows to remain responsive, I need to make
Mark Hammond wrote:
: Currently, event loops are available in Python via PyOS_InputHook, a
: pointer to a user-defined function that is called when Python is idle
: (waiting for user input). However, an event loop using PyOS_InputHook
: has some inherent limitations, so I am thinking about how
Raymond Hettinger wrote:
That is somewhat misleading. We already have that ability. What is
being proposed is moving existing code to a different namespace. So the
motivation is really something like:
I want to write
s = s.dedent()
because it is too painful to write
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin I would also recommend to throw away the sandbox completely and
Martin check it out from scratch. Please report whether this gives you
Martin code.h.
Yes, it does (still with my built-from-source 1.2.3).
Ok. I am now
Thomas Lee wrote:
Implemented as you suggested and tested. I'll submit the patch to the
tracker on sourceforge shortly. Are you guys still after contextual
diffs as per the developer pages, or is an svn diff the preferred way to
submit patches now?
svn diff should be fine. Although I
Noam Raphael wrote:
Following Avi's suggestion, can I raise this thread up again? I think
that Reinhold's .dedent() method can be a good idea after all.
The idea is to add a method called dedent to strings. It would do
exactly what the current textwrap.indent function does.
You are missing
You are missing a point here: string methods were introduced
to make switching from plain 8-bit strings to Unicode easier.
Is it the only purpose ?
I agree with the OP that using string methods is much nicer and more
convenient than having to import separate modules.
Especially, it is nice to
There's still more clean up work to go, but the current AST is
hopefully much closer to the behaviour before it was checked in.
There are still a few small memory leaks.
After running the test suite, the total references were around 380k
(down from over 1,000k). I'm not sure exactly what the
Martin v. Löwis:
The problem (for me, atleast) is that VC is so much more convenient to
work with.
In my experience Visual C++ has always produced faster, more
compact code than Mingw. While this may not be true with current
releases, I'd want to ensure that the normal Python download for
On 11/13/05, Nick Coghlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thomas Lee wrote:
Implemented as you suggested and tested. I'll submit the patch to the
tracker on sourceforge shortly. Are you guys still after contextual
diffs as per the developer pages, or is an svn diff the preferred way to
submit
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Michiel Jan Laurens de Hoon wrote:
The problem with threading (apart from potential portability problems)
is that Python doesn't let us know when it's idle. This would cause
excessive repainting (I can give you an explicit example if you're
interested).
I don't
Noam Raphael wrote:
On 11/13/05, Greg Ewing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Noam Raphael wrote:
callback. Then, when the interpreter is idle, it will call all the
registered callbacks, one at a time, and everyone would be happy.
Except for those who don't like busy waiting.
I'm not
Michiel Jan Laurens de Hoon wrote:
For an extension module such as
PyGtk, the developers may decide that PyGtk is likely to be run in
non-interactive mode only, for which the PyGtk mainloop is sufficient.
Did you read my reply? ipython, based on code.py, implements a few simple
threading
I personally like Edward Loper's idea of just running your own event
handler which deals with drawing, suspend/resume, etc...
If, however, Python contains an event loop that takes care of events as
well as Python commands, redrawing won't happen until Python has
executed all plot commands
24 matches
Mail list logo
