R. David Murray wrote:
Having such a poly_str type would probably make my life easier.
A thought on this poly_str type: perhaps it could be
called ascii, since that's what it would have to be
restricted to, and have
a'xxx'
as a literal syntax for it, seeing as literals seem to
be one of
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 08:28:45PM +1200, Greg Ewing wrote:
A thought on this poly_str type: perhaps it could be
called ascii, since that's what it would have to be
restricted to, and have
a'xxx'
as a literal syntax for it, seeing as literals seem to
be one of its main use cases.
This
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 13:55:26 +0530, Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 08:28:45PM +1200, Greg Ewing wrote:
Thinking way outside the square, and probably the pale
as well, maybe @ could be pressed into service as an
infix operator, with
s...@i
Brett Cannon wrote:
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 13:37, Jeffrey Yasskin jyass...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Jeffrey Yasskin jyass...@gmail.com wrote:
AC_PROG_CC is the macro that sets CFLAGS to -g -O2
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Greg Ewing greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote:
R. David Murray wrote:
Having such a poly_str type would probably make my life easier.
A thought on this poly_str type: perhaps it could be
called ascii, since that's what it would have to be
restricted to, and
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 12:38 PM, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 13:37, Jeffrey Yasskin jyass...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure I understand the importance of allowing AC_PROG_CC to set
Mark Dickinson wrote:
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 12:38 PM, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 13:37, Jeffrey Yasskin jyass...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure I understand the importance of allowing
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 3:04 PM, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
Why do you think that the default -O2 is unwanted
Because it can cause debug builds of Python to be built with
optimization enabled, as we've already seen at least twice.
and how do you know
whether the compiler accepts -g
Mark Dickinson wrote:
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 3:04 PM, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
Why do you think that the default -O2 is unwanted
Because it can cause debug builds of Python to be built with
optimization enabled, as we've already seen at least twice.
Then let me put it this way:
M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
Mark Dickinson wrote:
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 3:04 PM, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
Why do you think that the default -O2 is unwanted
Because it can cause debug builds of Python to be built with
optimization enabled, as we've already seen at least twice.
Then
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 4:28 PM, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
Mark Dickinson wrote:
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 3:04 PM, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
Why do you think that the default -O2 is unwanted
Because it can cause debug builds of Python to be built with
optimization
Mark Dickinson wrote:
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 4:28 PM, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
Mark Dickinson wrote:
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 3:04 PM, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
Why do you think that the default -O2 is unwanted
Because it can cause debug builds of Python to be built
It would be interesting to see benchmark diagrams inline on one page
with overall summaries. I've posted a enhancement to
http://code.google.com/p/unladen-swallow/issues/detail?id=145 if
somebody is going to look at that. I wonder if 32bit version can bring
more speedups?
--
anatoly t.
Hello,
I need to send logging module output over the network. The module has
everything to make this happen, except security. SocketHandler and
DatagramHandler examples are using pickle module that is said to be
insecure. SocketHandler and DatagramHandler docs should at least
contain a warning
I am a very new to python and have a small question..
I have a function:
set_time_at_next_pps(self, *args, **kwargs) but don't know how to use it...
Askign for your help please.
Cheers,
Zoh
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Access-a-function-tp29008798p29008798.html
Sent
On 28/06/2010 19:09, Zohair wrote:
I am a very new to python and have a small question..
I have a function:
set_time_at_next_pps(self, *args, **kwargs) but don't know how to use it...
Askign for your help please.
Hi Zoh,
This mailing list is for the development *of* Python, not for
Hello.
We'are sorry but we cannot help you. This mailing list is to work on
developing Python (fixing bugs and adding new features to Python itself); if
you're having problems using Python, please find another forum. Probably
python-list (comp.lang.python) news group/mailing list is the best
Issue #5180 [1] presented an interesting challenge: how to unpickle
instances of old-style classes when a pickle created with 2.x is
loaded in 3.x python? The problem is that pickle protocol requires
that unpickled instances be created without calling the __init__
method. This is necessary
Of course I concur with the two posters above me, but in order to
advertise for my own shop... If you're stuck with a lot of newbie
questions like these you might want to try #python (the IRC channel on
irc.freenode.net). You're more likely to get quick successive
responses there than on other
I'm moving this thread to python-ideas, where it belongs.
I've looked at the implementation code (even stepped through it with
pdb!), read the sample/test code, and read the two papers on
animats.com fairly closely (they have a lot of overlap, and the memory
model described below seems copied
20 matches
Mail list logo
