On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 3:29 AM, Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Michael Foord fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk
wrote:
On 08/04/2011 00:36, Anthony Scopatz wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Michael Foord fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk
wrote:
On 07/04/2011
Jesse Noller, 07.04.2011 22:28:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Anthony Scopatz wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for putting this together. I am a huge supporter of benchmarking
efforts. My brief comment is below.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:52 AM, DasIch wrote:
1. Definition of the benchmark suite.
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Jesse Noller, 07.04.2011 22:28:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Anthony Scopatz wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for putting this together. I am a huge supporter of benchmarking
efforts. My brief comment is below.
On Wed,
Maciej Fijalkowski, 08.04.2011 11:41:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Stefan Behnelstefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Jesse Noller, 07.04.2011 22:28:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Anthony Scopatz wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for putting this together. I am a huge supporter of benchmarking
efforts.
On 08/04/2011 02:10, Robert Collins wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 8:12 AM, Michael Foordfuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk wrote:
On 07/04/2011 20:18, Robert Collins wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 4:49 AM, Michael Foordfuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk
wrote:
You mean that the test run keeps the test
On 08/04/2011 11:18, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Maciej Fijalkowski, 08.04.2011 11:41:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Stefan Behnelstefan...@behnel.de
wrote:
[snip...]
So, once CPython is up and running in the benchmark test, adding Cython
should be as easy as copying the configuration, installing
On 08/04/2011 02:02, Eugene Toder wrote:
Because tracker is ugly.
Is this an unbiased opinion? :)
Having Python code syntax highlighted would definitely be *nicer*, and
wouldn't *necessarily* mean switching to a custom markup format for all
submissions (we could probably get 90% of the way
A few odds and ends from recent discussions finally clicked into
something potentially interesting earlier this evening. Or possibly
just something insane. I'm not quite decided on that point as yet (but
leaning towards the latter).
Anyway, without further ado, I present:
AST Transformation
Sorry, my last mail was meant to go to python-ideas, not python-dev
(and the gmail/mailman disagreement means I can't easily reply to it).
Reply to the version on python-ideas please, not the version on here.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Maciej Fijalkowski, 08.04.2011 11:41:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Stefan Behnelstefan...@behnel.de
wrote:
Jesse Noller, 07.04.2011 22:28:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Anthony Scopatz wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Maciej Fijalkowski, 08.04.2011 13:37:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
So, once CPython is up and running in the benchmark test, adding Cython
should be as easy as copying the configuration, installing Cython and
adding
two lines to site.py.
can you provide a simple
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/07/2011 07:52 PM, Michael Foord wrote:
Personally I think the Gsoc project should just take the pypy suite and
run with that - bikeshedding about what benchmarks to include is going
to make it hard to make progress. We can have fun with
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/07/2011 07:52 PM, Michael Foord wrote:
Personally I think the Gsoc project should just take the pypy suite and
run with that - bikeshedding about what benchmarks to
On 8 April 2011 12:29, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
A few odds and ends from recent discussions finally clicked into
something potentially interesting earlier this evening. Or possibly
just something insane. I'm not quite decided on that point as yet (but
leaning towards the
and will you complain if we don't provide a custom cython
hacks? (like providing extra type information)
I don't consider providing extra type information a hack. Remember that
they
are only used for additional speed-ups in cases where the author is
smarter
than the compiler.
On 4/8/2011 11:32 AM, Anthony Scopatz wrote:
an interpreter. For the purposes of benchmarking, the distinction
between compiler and interpreter, as some one said above, 'dubious'.
I agree. We should be comparing 'Python execution systems'. My
impression is that some of what Cython does in
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2011-04-01 - 2011-04-08)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue.
Do NOT respond to this message.
Issues counts and deltas:
open2741 ( +8)
closed 20845 (+58)
total 23586 (+66)
Open issues
Hi,
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/7582a78f573b
branch: 3.1
user:Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org
summary:
Issue 11715: Build extension modules on multiarch Debian and Ubuntu
by
extending search paths to include multiarch directories.
diff --git a/setup.py b/setup.py
+
Hi Nick, all,
Just for the record, I would point to Mython (mython.org) as an
existing provider of this capability. I've already added an AST node
called Quote that functions like your DSL node, along with well
defined lexical, concrete syntax, and compile-time properties.
I have a mostly
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 21:29 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
A few odds and ends from recent discussions finally clicked into
something potentially interesting earlier this evening. Or possibly
just something insane. I'm not quite decided on that point as yet (but
leaning towards the latter).
I too
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:50 AM, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 21:29 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
A few odds and ends from recent discussions finally clicked into
something potentially interesting earlier this evening. Or possibly
just something insane. I'm
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 18:10:35 +0200
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org wrote:
Hi,
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/7582a78f573b
branch: 3.1
user:Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org
summary:
Issue 11715: Build extension modules on multiarch Debian and Ubuntu
by
extending
I talked to Fijal about my project last night, the result is that
basically the project as is, is not that interesting because the means
to execute the benchmarks on multiple interpreters are currently
missing.
Another point we talked about was that porting the benchmarks would
not be very useful
On 4/8/2011 1:14 PM, Jon Riehl wrote:
I have a mostly functioning front end for 2.X that does these
expansions (MyFront), and I'm waiting for a stable Mercurial migration
Done and in use over a month. http://hg.python.org/
Further discussion of this idea is on the python-ideas list.
(The
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 3:40 AM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
Isn’t there a possible raise condition here? I think it’s recommended
to follow EAFP for mkdir and makedirs.
Since this is setup.py, I don't think we care.
(I assume you meant race condition, not raise condition)
25 matches
Mail list logo
