On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 07:17:10AM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
NEWS entry? (same question for the later _sre fix)
Added. Thanks for catching this.
For some reason, I had slight doubt, if those issues were NEWS worthy
items. IIRC, devguide recommends that a NEWS entry be added for all fixes
So I'm trying to generate dynamic choices for django form. Here i'm usig
formset concept (CODE is mentioned below)
Suppose i have list called criteria_list = ['education', 'know how',
'managerial', 'interpersonal', ]
now i need to generate choices as follows
list1 = [('education', 1),
Asif Jamadar, 20.10.2011 20:51:
So I'm trying to generate dynamic choices for django form.[...]
Note that this is the CPython core developers mailing list. The right list
for general Python programming related questions is either
python-l...@python.org, or the newsgroup comp.lang.python.
I believe this is not the correct forum for this as it does not
concern development of Python language itself - you should post to
comp.lang.python. However solutions is relatively simply, try this:
list1,list2,list3,list4,list5,list6 = [ list(itertools.product(i,range(0,4)))
for i in
Hello.
We are sorry but we cannot help you. This mailing list is to work on
developing Python (adding new features to Python itself and fixing bugs);
if you're having problems learning, understanding or using Python, please
find another forum. Probably python-list/comp.lang.python mailing
Hi,This is my first time on Python-dev, so I apologize for my newbie-ness.I have been doing some performance experiments with memcmp, and I wassurprised that memcmp wasn't faster than it was in Python. I did a whole,long analysis and came up with some very simple results.Before I put in a tracker
Hello,
I have been doing some performance experiments with memcmp, and I was
surprised that memcmp wasn't faster than it was in Python. I did a whole,
long analysis and came up with some very simple results.
Before I put in a tracker bug report, I wanted to present my findings
and make
On 10/20/2011 5:08 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Have you reported gcc's outdated optimization issue to them? Or is it
already solved in newer gcc versions?
I checked this on gcc 4.6, and it still optimizes memcmp/strcmp into a
repz cmpsb instruction on x86. This has been known to be a problem
My take is that a further fix or tweak to something that already has a NEWS
entry for the current release doesn't get a new entry, but everything else
does. What's New is the place to get selective.
--
Nick Coghlan (via Gmail on Android, so likely to be more terse than usual)
On Oct 21, 2011 2:46
Hey, I have been doing some performance experiments with memcmp, and I was surprised that memcmp wasn't faster than it was in Python. I did a whole, long analysis and came up with some very simple results.Paul Svensson suggested I post as much as I can as text, as people would be more likely to
10 matches
Mail list logo
