Re: [Python-Dev] Second milestone of FAT Python

typo: "chance" instead of "change" On 04.11.2015 21:14, Sven R. Kunze wrote: Hi Victor, great to hear. I think everybody here appreciates your efforts. Do you think there will be any change of merging this back into CPython? Best, Sven On 04.11.2015 09:50, Victor Stinner wrote: Hi, I'm

Re: [Python-Dev] Second milestone of FAT Python

On 11/4/2015 3:50 AM, Victor Stinner wrote: Hi, I'm writing a new "FAT Python" project to try to implement optimizations in CPython (inlining, constant folding, move invariants out of loops, etc.) using a "static" optimizer (not a JIT). For the background, see the thread on python-ideas:

Re: [Python-Dev] Second milestone of FAT Python

2015-11-04 21:14 GMT+01:00 Sven R. Kunze : > Do you think there will be any change of merging this back into CPython? If I understood correctly the first feedback on python-ideas, there were mostly positive, so I believe that it would be possible to merge the FAT mode into

[Python-Dev] Python 3.5.1 release schedule

At the request of the platform experts, 3.5.1 is now scheduled to happen simultaneously with 2.7.11. That means: Saturday November 21, 2015 tag 3.5.1rc1 Sunday November 22, 2015 release 3.5.1rc1 Saturday December 5, 2015 tag 3.5.1 final Sunday December 6, 2015 release

Re: [Python-Dev] Rationale behind lazy map/filter

> I'm not suggesting restarting at the top (I've elsewhere suggested that > many such methods would be better as an *iterable* that can be restarted > at the top by calling iter() multiple times, but that's not the same > thing). I'm suggesting raising an exception other than StopIteration, so >

Re: [Python-Dev] Second milestone of FAT Python

Hi Victor, great to hear. I think everybody here appreciates your efforts. Do you think there will be any change of merging this back into CPython? Best, Sven On 04.11.2015 09:50, Victor Stinner wrote: Hi, I'm writing a new "FAT Python" project to try to implement optimizations in CPython

Re: [Python-Dev] Second milestone of FAT Python

How do you check that someone did not e.g. bind something different to "len"? On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Victor Stinner wrote: > Hi, > > I'm writing a new "FAT Python" project to try to implement optimizations in > CPython (inlining, constant folding, move

Re: [Python-Dev] Second milestone of FAT Python

Uh, sorry, misread your full mail, scratch that On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: > How do you check that someone did not e.g. bind something different to "len"? > > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Victor Stinner > wrote: >>

[Python-Dev] Second milestone of FAT Python

Hi, I'm writing a new "FAT Python" project to try to implement optimizations in CPython (inlining, constant folding, move invariants out of loops, etc.) using a "static" optimizer (not a JIT). For the background, see the thread on python-ideas:

Re: [Python-Dev] Second milestone of FAT Python

On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 09:50:33AM +0100, Victor Stinner wrote: > Hi, > > I'm writing a new "FAT Python" project to try to implement optimizations in > CPython (inlining, constant folding, move invariants out of loops, etc.) > using a "static" optimizer (not a JIT). For the background, see the