Well, I'm not sure weather or not this is what you're looking for, but
pep-8 (https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/) suggest like this:
For Python 3.0 and beyond, the following policy is prescribed for the
standard library (see PEP 3131): All identifiers in the Python standard
library MUST
> On Apr 15, 2018, at 5:50 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> On 2018-04-14 23:14, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>> That actually sounds like a pretty big problem. I'm sure there is lots
>> of code that doesn't *just* duck-type nor calls inspect but uses
>> isinstance() to decide how
Excuse me if this was discussed before, but in French and Japanese
translations, all the sample programs seem to have identifiers in
English still. According to "PEP 545 -- Python Documentation
Translations", as I understand .po files are used for translations. May
I ask if there's technical
15.04.18 16:09, Nick Coghlan пише:
On 15 April 2018 at 22:50, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
I've been told that there might also be a problem with Random._randbelow,
even though it doesn't cause test failures.
From Raymond's description (and from an initial reading of the code),
On 15 April 2018 at 22:50, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2018-04-14 23:14, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>>
>> That actually sounds like a pretty big problem. I'm sure there is lots
>> of code that doesn't *just* duck-type nor calls inspect but uses
>> isinstance() to decide how to
On 2018-04-14 23:14, Guido van Rossum wrote:
That actually sounds like a pretty big problem. I'm sure there is lots
of code that doesn't *just* duck-type nor calls inspect but uses
isinstance() to decide how to extract the desired information.
In the CPython standard library, the *only* fixes