Thank you. I can't think of a compelling reason someone would want to choose
SHA224 over SHA256 in the context of wheel generation. It just that the PEPs
are usually pretty explicit and SHA224 seemed to be implicitly excluded from
RECORD files. And I'm considering the details of making a pret
On 3/27/21 4:23 PM, Jelle Zijlstra wrote:
Now, PEP 649 doesn't actually fix this at the moment, since it still
resolves all annotations in the global scope, but that's easily fixed
by removing the special case in
https://github.com/larryhastings/co_annotations/blob/co_annotations/Python/compil
Just a few comments to add to Irit's response.
On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 11:03 AM Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
[..]
> Bottom line: this seems like a Trio's special-purpose feature, with
> good wishes of becoming the de facto standard.
The bottom line is that Trio nurseries were proven to be a very usefu
I suggest that SHA224 does not qualify as "SHA256 or better".
Truncating any hash should not be considered equivalent or better.
Reductio ad absurdum: truncate to 128 bits, 16 bits, 8 bits, or 1 bit.
On Mon, 2021-03-29 at 08:15 +, Theallredman via Python-Dev wrote:
> No need to be condescendin
On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 17:40, Theallredman via Python-Dev
wrote:
> So going back to my actual question SHA224 is disallowed in record files
> because it's bit length is less then 256?
It doesn't look like it's ever been excluded. The only explicit
exclusions are MD5 and SHA1 as you point out. Do
No need to be condescending. Trust me when I say I know the bit length relates
to the collision resistance. Also trust me when I say there are other
dimensions upon which to consider one hash algo over another other then just
collision resistance such as, power consumption, execution time, wheth
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 7:35 AM Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Mar 2021, 7:47 pm Mark Shannon, wrote:
>
> [Guido wrote]
>
>> >
>> > Also, I think that we should probably separate this out in two separate
>> > flag sets, one for subjects and one for class patterns -- it is pretty
>> > confusing
On Mon, 29 Mar 2021, 7:47 pm Mark Shannon, wrote:
[Guido wrote]
> >
> > Also, I think that we should probably separate this out in two separate
> > flag sets, one for subjects and one for class patterns -- it is pretty
> > confusing to merge the flag sets into a single value when their
> > appli
Hi Guido,
Thanks for the feedback.
On 27/03/2021 10:15 pm, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Hi Mark,
Reading that spec will take some time. Can you please summarize the
differences in English, in a way that is about as precise as PEP 634? I
have some comments inline below as well.
On Sat, Mar 27, 2
