On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 14:30, Andrea Crotti andrea.crott...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/21/2011 10:08 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Hello,
There are currently a bunch of various buildbot failures on all 3
branches. I would remind committers to regularly take a look at the
buildbots, so that these
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 13:46, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org wrote:
2011/11/6 brian.curtin python-check...@python.org:
-
- if (!PyArg_ParseTuple(args, OO:utime,
+ PyObject* arg = NULL;
You could set arg = Py_None here.
+
+ if (!PyArg_ParseTuple(args, O|O:utime,
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 14:47, Georg Brandl g.bra...@gmx.net wrote:
Am 08.11.2011 21:30, schrieb brian.curtin:
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/60ae7979fec8
changeset: 73463:60ae7979fec8
user: Brian Curtin br...@python.org
date: Tue Nov 08 14:30:02 2011 -0600
summary
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 10:14, Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org wrote:
I think we should have an official pronouncement about Python 2.8, and PEPs
are as official as it gets 'round here. Thus I propose the following. If
there are no objections wink, I'll commit this taking the next available
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 05:40, Jesús Cea j...@jcea.es wrote:
Python insider blog was a great idea, trying to open and expose python-dev
to the world. A great and necessary idea.
But the last post was in August.
I wonder if the project is dead... Would be sad :-(
http://blog.python.org/
As Jesus mentioned earlier today, it has been a while since
http://blog.python.org/ was been updated, and even before that it
wasn't updated all that often. I'd like to try and get others involved
so we can get a more steady flow going and highlight more of the work
everyone is doing.
The blog
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 14:26, Cedric Sodhi man...@gmx.net wrote:
IF YOU THINK YOU MUST REPLY SOMETHING WITTY, ITERATE THAT THIS HAD BEEN
DISCUSSED BEFORE, REPLY THAT IT'S SIMPLY NOT GO'NNA HAPPEN, THAT WHO
DOESN'T LIKE IT IS FREE TO CHOOSE ANOTHER LANGUAGE OR SOMETHING
SIMILAR, JUST DON'T.
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 19:51, Alex Gaynor alex.gay...@gmail.com wrote:
A few thoughts on this:
a) This is not a new issue, I'm curious what the new interest is in it.
Well they (the presenters of the report) had to be accepted to that
conference for *something*, otherwise we wouldn't know
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 11:55, antoine.pitrou
python-check...@python.org wrote:
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/cf57ef65bcd0
changeset: 74194:cf57ef65bcd0
user: Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net
date: Thu Dec 29 18:54:15 2011 +0100
summary:
Issue #12715: Add an optional
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 13:39, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 13:29:36 -0600
Brian Curtin br...@python.org wrote:
Can we expect that readers on Windows know how os.symlink works, or
should the stipulations of os.symlink usage also be laid out or at
least linked
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 12:26, francis franci...@email.de wrote:
On 01/02/2012 06:35 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
On 01/02/2012 03:41 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jan 2012 14:44:49 +1000
Nick Coghlanncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
He keeps leaving them out, I occasionally tell him they should
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 00:30, Stephen J. Turnbull step...@xemacs.org wrote:
Benjamin Peterson writes:
My goodness, I was trying to make a ridiculous-sounding proposition.
In this kind of discussion, that's in the same class as be careful
what you wish for -- because you might just get it.
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 16:07, mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
A then-related question is whether Python 3.3 should be compiled with Visual
Studio 11. I'd still be in favor of that, provided Microsoft manages to
release that soon enough.
I'm guessing the change would have to be done before the first
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 18:04, Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 January 2012 22:56, Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com wrote:
A then-related question is whether Python 3.3 should be compiled with
Visual
Studio 11. I'd still be in favor of that, provided Microsoft manages to
release
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 16:33, Jim Jewett jimjjew...@gmail.com wrote:
In http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-January/115368.html
Stefan Behnel wrote:
Can you please configure your mail client to not create new threads
like this? As if this topic wasn't already hard enough to follow,
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 14:00, Jason R. Coombs jar...@jaraco.com wrote:
The second thing I notice is the scripts assume Visual Studio 2008. And
while I recognize that Python is specifically built against Visual Studio
2008 for the official releases and that Visual Studio 2008 may be the only
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 18:01, Jason R. Coombs
My goal in adding the upgrade code was to provide a one-step upgrade for
developers with only VS 10 installed. That's what vs-upgrade in
jaraco.develop does.
Upgrading to 2010 requires some code changes in addition to the
conversion, so the
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 14:43, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
It seems a number of people are interested that the Python trunk
switches to Visual Studio 2010 *now*. I've been hesitant to agree
to such a change, as I still hope that Python can skip over VS 2010
(a.k.a. VS 10), and
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 15:01, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
I previously completed the port at my old company (but could not
release it), and I have a good bit of it completed for us at
http://hg.python.org/sandbox/vs2010port/. That repo is a little bit
behind 'default' but
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 17:54, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
Ok, so let me add then that I'm worried about the additional work-load.
I'm particularly worried about the coordination of vacation across the
three people that work on a release. It might well not be possible to
make
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 15:11, Brian Curtin br...@python.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 15:01, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
I previously completed the port at my old company (but could not
release it), and I have a good bit of it completed for us at
http://hg.python.org
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 14:23, Trent Nelson tr...@snakebite.org wrote:
Brian, what are your plans? Are you going to continue working in
hg.python.org/sandbox/vs2010port then merge everything over when
ready? I have some time available to work on this for the next
three weeks or
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 15:37, Catalin Iacob iacobcata...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:43 PM, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
...
P.S. Here is my personal list of requirements and non-requirements:
...
- must generate binaries that run on Windows XP
I recently read
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 15:41, Brian Curtin br...@python.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 15:37, Catalin Iacob iacobcata...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:43 PM, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de
wrote:
...
P.S. Here is my personal list of requirements and non-requirements
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 22:15, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
Folding the two
implementations together in the standard library would mean officially
declaring that xml.etree is now an independently maintained fork of
Fredrik's version rather than just a snapshot in time of a
particular
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 19:19, Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Charles-François Natali neolo...@free.fr writes:
Issue #8604 aims at adding an atomic file API to make it easier to
create/update files atomically, using rename() on POSIX systems and
MoveFileEx() on Windows (which
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 23:24, Mark Hammond skippy.hamm...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm wondering what thoughts are on PEP 397, the Python launcher for Windows.
I've been using the implementation for a number of months now and I find it
incredibly useful.
To my mind, the specific steps would be:
*
While some effort has gone on to get the 32-bit build to compile
without warnings (thanks for that!), 64-bit still has numerous
warnings. Before I push forward on more of the VS2010 port, I'd like
to have a clean 2008 build all around so we can more easily track what
may have changed. In
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 23:45, mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
Zitat von Brian Curtin br...@python.org:
While some effort has gone on to get the 32-bit build to compile
without warnings (thanks for that!), 64-bit still has numerous
warnings. Before I push forward on more of the VS2010 port, I'd
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:04, shibturn shibt...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22/02/2012 3:32am, Brian Curtin wrote:
1. Is anyone opposed to moving up to Level 4 warnings?
At that level I think it complains about common things like the do {...}
while (0) idiom, and the unreferenced self parameter
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 18:21, Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org wrote:
Le 11/02/2012 12:00, Eli Bendersky a écrit :
Well, I think the situation is pretty good now. If one goes to
python.org and is interested in contributing, clicking on the Core
Development link is a sensible step, right?
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 01:15, Stephen J. Turnbull step...@xemacs.org wrote:
Brian Curtin writes:
If you want to contribute to development, I think you'll know that a
link about development is relevant.
For values of you in experienced programmers, yes. But
translators and tech writers
On Feb 24, 2012 6:26 PM, Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On 24/02/2012 21:37, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
I was of the thought that Old String Formatting |%s % foo| was to be
phased out by Advanced String Formatting |{}.format(foo)|.
This is actually not the case, and never was.
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 17:15, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
This is probably a dumb question, but why can't we add u'' back to 3.2? It
seems an incredibly minor change, and we are not in security-only fix stage,
are we?
We don't add features to bug-fix releases.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 09:04, Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org wrote:
We really need to stop saying that porting to Python 3 is hard, or should be
delayed. It's not in the vast majority of cases. Yes, there are warts, and
we should continue to improve Python 3 so it gets easier, but by no means
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:51, Vinay Sajip vinay_sa...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Brett Cannon brett at python.org writes:
Changes to http://docs.python.org/howto/pyporting.html are welcome. I tried
to
make sure it exposed all possibilities with tips on how to support as far
back
as Python 2.5.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 14:27, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
Here's what I know:
We don't add features to bug-fix releases.
u'' is considered a feature.
By not backporting to 3.1 and 3.2 we are not easing the migration pains from
2.x.
Let's say it's 2013 and 3.3 has been out for a
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 15:40, Watts, Wendy wwa...@vtrit.com wrote:
Hello, my name is Wendy; I am a IT recruiter for vtrIT which is a division
of Volt Workforce Technical Solutions located in San Francisco. I have an
urgent Senior and Junior Python Engineer positions open for a client located
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 19:23, Andrey Petrov sha...@gmail.com wrote:
What such a snippet might look like:
Batteries are included with Python but sometimes they are old and
leaky—this is one of those cases. Please have a look in PyPI for more modern
alternatives provided by the Python
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 21:14, Andrey Petrov sha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Brian Curtin br...@python.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 19:23, Andrey Petrov sha...@gmail.com wrote:
What such a snippet might look like:
Batteries are included with Python but sometimes
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 14:13, Kenneth Reitz m...@kennethreitz.com wrote:
I think the cheesehop trove classifiers would be the ideal way to
agnostically link to a page of packages related to the standard package in
question. No need for sort order.
Randomize the order for all I care. We still
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 14:43, VanL van.lindb...@gmail.com wrote:
Following up on conversations at PyCon, I want to bring up one of my
personal hobby horses for change in 3.3: Fix install layout on Windows, with
a side order of making the PATH work better.
Short version:
1) The layout for
As with last year, I've put together a summary of the Python Language
Summit which took place last week at PyCon 2012. This was compiled
from my notes as well as those of Eric Snow and Senthil Kumaran, and I
think we got decent coverage of what was said throughout the day.
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 13:52, Georg Brandl g.bra...@gmx.net wrote:
Thanks for the comprehensive report (I'm still reading). May I request
for the future that you also paste a copy in the email to the group, for
purposes of archiving and ease of discussing? (Just like we also post
PEPs to
that PEP `397`_ was something we should
accept. Brian Curtin spoke in favor of the PEP, as well as mentioning ongoing
work on the Windows installer to optionally add the executable's directory
to the Path.
After discussion outside of the summit, it was additionally agreed upon that
the launcher should
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 19:53, Mark Hammond skippy.hamm...@gmail.com wrote:
For the sake of brain-storming, how about this:
* All executables and scripts go into the root of the Python install. This
directory is largely empty now - it is mainly a container for other
directories. This would
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 23:13, ncdave4life ncdave4l...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed that pydoc doesn't work for pygame under python 3.2.1 for Win32:
NotImplementedError: scrap module not available (ImportError: No module
named scrap)
I made a small patch to inspect.py to solve the problem (I
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:52, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
In hearing from a couple people who teach python to beginners, this is a
substantial hurdle - the first thing they need to do is to edit their
environment to add these directories to the PATH.
This is something I never
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 12:59, Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
Note - that is not Regularizing the layout. You have not made any
changes to OS/2 (which matches Windows at the moment).
I think that would be a wasted effort with OS/2 entering unsupported
mode in 3.3, and OS/2 specific code
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 13:57, VanL van.lindb...@gmail.com wrote:
Honestly, I didn't expect that much resistance. None of the people I talked
to in person even cared, or if they did, they thought that consistency was a
benefit. But now that virtualenvs are going in in 3.3, I see this as the
2012/3/22 VanL van.lindb...@gmail.com:
Open Issues:
If we do put python.exe on PATH (whether it's in bin or not), we have
to debate how to handle people having multiple versions of python on
their machine. In a post-PEP 397 world, no Python is the machine
default - .py files are associated
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 18:26, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
Given the cost of the change, and the advent of the PEP-397 Launcher, I also
vote -1.
Can you provide some justification other than a number? It's a pretty
cheap change and the launcher solves somewhat of a different problem.
On Mar 23, 2012 6:25 PM, Victor Stinner victor.stin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
time.steady(strict=True) looks to be confusing for most people, some
of them don't understand the purpose of the flag and others don't like
a flag changing the behaviour of the function.
I propose to replace
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 18:38, Yury Selivanov yselivanov...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-03-23, at 7:28 PM, Brian Curtin wrote:
This seems like it should have been a PEP, or maybe should become a PEP.
Why? AFAIK Victor just proposes to add two new functions: monotonic() and
steady().
We just
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 07:19, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 4:35 AM, PJ Eby p...@telecommunity.com wrote:
Just dumping things in a directory adjacent to the corresponding scripts is
the original virtualenv, and it still works just dandy -- most people just
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 14:50, Andrew Svetlov andrew.svet...@gmail.com wrote:
I like to see new schema only for 3.3 as sign of shiny new release.
Please don't do this. It will result in endless complaints.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 05:00, Jon K Peck p...@us.ibm.com wrote:
I am out of the office until 03/30/2012.
I will be out of the office through Friday, March 30. I expect to have
some email access but may be delayed in responding.
Note: This is an automated response to your message
After talking with Martin and several others during the language
summit and elsewhere around PyCon, PEP 397 should be accepted. I don't
remember who, but some suggested it should just be a regular old
feature instead of going through the PEP process. So...does this even
need to continue the PEP
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 17:45, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org wrote:
2012/3/29 Brian Curtin br...@python.org:
After talking with Martin and several others during the language
summit and elsewhere around PyCon, PEP 397 should be accepted. I don't
remember who, but some suggested
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 18:08, Glenn Linderman v+pyt...@g.nevcal.com wrote:
All it needs is official acceptance now, and integration into the release,
no?
If it wasn't clear, this is what I said in the first post.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 22:48, mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
Now that we do have the PEP, I think that should be done properly.
I thought you offered to rewrite it.
There are definitely areas that I would like to work on, especially
pulling implementation details out and replacing with, as you
2012/3/31 Kristján Valur Jónsson krist...@ccpgames.com:
Hi,
Does anyone object if I submit my patches sxs.patch and errnomodule.patch?
These allow python to work correctly when built with vs2010.
There is also the PCBuild10.patch, but that can wait. I'm sure a number of
people are
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:00, Matěj Cepl mc...@redhat.com wrote:
Why does HG cpython repo contains .{bzr,git}ignore at all?
IMHO, all .*ignore files should be strictly repository dependent and they
should not be mixed together.
For what reason? Are the git or bzr files causing issues on HG?
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 17:31, Matěj Cepl mc...@redhat.com wrote:
On 1.4.2012 23:46, Brian Curtin wrote:
For what reason? Are the git or bzr files causing issues on HG?
No, but wrong .gitignore causes issues with git repo obtained via
hg-fast-import. If it is meant as an intentional sabotage
Hi all,
If you are a running a build slave or otherwise have an MSDN account
for development work, please check that your MSDN subscription is
still in effect. If the subscription expired, please let me know in
private what your subscriber ID is along with the email address you
use for the
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 14:59, Andrew Svetlov andrew.svet...@gmail.com wrote:
I filed the issue http://bugs.python.org/issue14470 for removing
w9xopen from subprocess as python 3.3 has declaration about finishing
support of Windows 2000 and Win9x family.
But, as I see, VC project for building
Can someone let me in on the process to upgrade tcl and tk on
svn.python.org? For the VS2010 port it looks like I need to upgrade
since the 8.5.9 versions do not work. They use link options that choke
on 2010. Taking 8.5.11, which is the current release, seems to work
out alright so far.
It seems
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 18:41, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
In particular, it should include a recent fix so that French keyboards work
with tk/tkinter and hence Idle better than now. There has been more than one
complaint about this.
Do you know when this was fixed or have any
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 20:53, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
On 4/9/2012 7:53 PM, Brian Curtin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 18:41, Terry Reedytjre...@udel.edu wrote:
In particular, it should include a recent fix so that French keyboards
work
with tk/tkinter and hence Idle better than
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:29, Victor Stinner
I will move the precision of monotonic clock of Windows 9x info into this
table.
I would just remove it entirely. It's not relevant since it's not supported.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 09:52, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 07:19, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 07:10:31 +0200
brian.curtin python-check...@python.org wrote:
PyErr_SetFromImportErrorWithNameAndPath
Apparently this new
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 09:54, Brian Curtin br...@python.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 09:52, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 07:19, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 07:10:31 +0200
brian.curtin python-check...@python.org wrote
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 18:02, Georg Brandl g.bra...@gmx.net wrote:
On 16.04.2012 22:14, brian.curtin wrote:
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/5cc8b717b38c
changeset: 76363:5cc8b717b38c
user: Brian Curtinbr...@python.org
date: Mon Apr 16 15:14:36 2012 -0500
summary:
Add
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 13:07, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
http://bugs.python.org/issue14617
Patch attached to issue.
Can I request that you not immediately post issues to python-dev?
Those who follow the bug tracker will see the issue and act
accordingly.
(unless I missed some
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 05:38, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
What do you think?
I think the possible use of Cython for standard library extension
modules is potentially worth looking into for the 3.4 timeframe
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 16:08, Stefan Behnel
While code generation alleviates the burden of tedious languages, it's also
infinitely more complex, makes debugging very difficult and adds to
prerequisite knowledge, among other drawbacks.
You can use gdb for source level debugging of Cython code
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 17:21, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Brian Curtin, 19.04.2012 23:19:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 16:08, Stefan Behnel
While code generation alleviates the burden of tedious languages, it's also
infinitely more complex, makes debugging very difficult and adds
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 14:34, Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org wrote:
Le 24/04/2012 15:02, Georg Brandl a écrit :
On 24.04.2012 20:34, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
2012/4/24 Georg Brandlg.bra...@gmx.net:
I think that's misleading: there's no way to correctly parse malformed
HTML.
There is in
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 08:13, brian.curtin python-check...@python.org wrote:
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/4e9f1017355f
changeset: 76556:4e9f1017355f
user: Brian Curtin br...@python.org
date: Wed Apr 25 08:12:37 2012 -0500
summary:
Fix #3561. Add an option to place
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/05/2012 19.33, Michael Foord wrote:
On 2 May 2012, at 16:55, Terry Reedy wrote:
I would send the above to webmas...@python.org (should be at the bottom
of pages). We develop CPython but do not directly manage
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman dirk...@ochtman.nl wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Larry Hastings la...@hastings.org wrote:
Do we officially support any C compilers that *don't* permit intermingled
variable declarations and code? Do we *unofficially* support any? And
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Brian Curtin br...@python.org wrote:
Hi all,
If you are a running a build slave or otherwise have an MSDN account
for development work, please check that your MSDN subscription is
still in effect. If the subscription expired, please let me know in
private what
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 2:30 AM, mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
If build slave owners could let me know when their machine has VS2010
I'd appreciate it. I got the go-ahead to commit the port but want to
wait until the build slaves are ready for it.
Please don't wait, but let the build slaves
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 2:52 AM, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
+All versions previous to 3.3 use Microsoft Visual Studio 2008, available
at
+https://www.microsoft.com/visualstudio/en-us/products/2008-editions/express.
This isn't actually the case. 2.4 and 2.5 used Visual Studio
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
Hello all,
We still need 64-bit Windows buildbots to test for regressions.
Otherwise we might let regressions slip through, since few people seem
to run the test suite under Windows at home.
The machine that I used
On May 18, 2012 1:26 PM, Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org wrote:
At what point should we cut over docs.python.org to point to the Python 3
documentation by default?
Today sounds good to me.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Sturla Molden stu...@molden.no wrote:
Mingw32CCompiler in cygwincompiler.py emits the symbol -mno-cygwin.
This is used to make Cygwin's gcc behave as mingw. As of gcc 4.6 it is not
recognized by the mingw gcc compiler itself, and causes as crash. It should
be
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
The free Visual Studio 11 Express for Windows 8 (still in beta) will produce
both 32 and 64 bit binaries and allow multiple languages but will only
produce Metro apps. For desktop apps, either the paid Visual Studio versions
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 8:44 PM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
+ except:
return None
except Exception may be better here.
Idle's Shell catches all exceptions. I think the attempt to provide an
optional help (a function signature) should too.
Can you
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Kristján Valur Jónsson
krist...@ccpgames.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: R. David Murray [mailto:rdmur...@bitdance.com]
The ValueError: Invalid format string was coming from a broken-on-
windows test_calendar test I checked in. It is fixed now
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Kristján Valur Jónsson
krist...@ccpgames.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Brian Curtin [mailto:br...@python.org]
Sent: 30. maí 2012 15:56
To: Kristján Valur Jónsson
Cc: python-dev@python.org
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] cpython: Issue #14744: Fix
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 8:22 AM, mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
I have just codified our current policy on supporting
Windows releases, namely that we only support some Windows
version until Microsoft ends its extended support period.
As a consequence, Windows XP will be supported until
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
On 6/1/2012 1:27 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
About the only thing I can think of from the language summit that we
discussed doing for Python 3.3 that has not come about is accepting the
regex module and getting it into the
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Umpteen versions of regex have been available on pypi for years. Umpteen
bugs against the original re module have been fixed. If regex can't now go
into the standard library, what on earth can?
Reviewing a 4000 line
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info wrote:
But changes to the stdlib (bug fixes or functional changes) are very likely
to run at a slower pace to what third-party packages can afford. If you
continue to develop regex outside of the stdlib, that could cause
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Salman Malik salma...@live.com wrote:
Hi All,
I am sort of a newbie to Python ( have just started to use pdb).
My problem is that I am debugging an application that uses greenlets and
when I encounter something in code that spawns the coroutines or wait for an
On Jun 13, 2012 8:31 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull step...@xemacs.org wrote:
Cameron Simpson writes:
This approach has its own problems. Is the proposed list, like many
lists,
restricted to accept posts only from subscribers? If that is the case,
when someone CCs the VM list, everyone
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Aahz a...@pythoncraft.com wrote:
Note: I'm no-mail on python-dev
- Forwarded message from Sean Johnson seanjohnso...@gmail.com -
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 03:48:55 -0400
From: Sean Johnson seanjohnso...@gmail.com
To: webmas...@python.org
Subject:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 2:17 AM, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
this is just a quick reminder that the feature freeze for 3.3
will start next weekend with the release of beta1. Since I
won't be able to shift that date for short periods (the next
possible date for me would be
Martin approached me earlier and requested that I act as PEP czar for
397. I haven't been involved in the writing of the PEP and have been
mostly observing from the outside, so I accepted and hope to get this
wrapped up quickly and implemented in time for the beta. The PEP is
pretty complete, but
1 - 100 of 363 matches
Mail list logo
