I've noticed over the past few weeks lots of questions
asked about multi-processing (including myself).
For those of you new to multi-processing, perhaps this
thread may help you. Some things I want to start off
with to point out are:
multiprocessing will not always help you get things done
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 1:06 AM, Barry Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On behalf of the Python development team and the Python community, I am
happy to announce the third and last planned release candidate for Python
3.0.
Whoohoo! :) Great works
*
--James
--
-- James Mills
--
-- Problems are solved by method
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
be held up because of wsgiref.
cheers
James
--
-- James Mills
--
-- Problems are solved by method
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python
that you
will already have to port your application to python3
(bytes vs. str) anyway. Changing the keys is just more
unnecessary work (although one could just use a search/replace).
My 2c (or pence)
cheers
james
--
-- James Mills
--
-- Problems are solved by method
for my project(s).
cheers
James
--
-- James Mills
--
-- Problems are solved by method
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev
mean to but in here and I may have no business
doing so... But what about circuits.core ?
cheers
James
--
-- James Mills
--
-- Problems are solved by method
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python
in the std. lib, etc.
I'll just follow and keep quiet now :)
cheers
James
--
-- James Mills
--
-- Problems are solved by method
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http
the proposed new async lib.
b) It should be general purpose enough to use without Twisted (for example)
I like the idea of having an async core in the std. lib that takes care
of cross-platform polling of I/O descriptors, notifications and timers.
cheers
James
--
-- James Mills
--
-- Problems are solved
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Daniel Stutzbach stutzb...@google.com wrote:
If we go with something based on or inspired by Twisted, that solves some
problems, but creates others. Will users be able to later migrate to using
Twisted proper? Will the standard library module and Twisted go
to be an obvious way to get around these rules for
named tuples... am I overlooking something?
Works for me. Python 3.2 on 32bit Linux.
cheers
James
--
-- James Mills
--
-- Problems are solved by method
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 12:57 PM, James Mills
prolo...@shortcircuit.net.au wrote:
[output omitted; it excludes _asdict, _replace, and _make]
Sorry I missed this bit :)
Works for me. Python 3.2 on 32bit Linux.
Scrap that :)
cheers
James
--
-- James Mills
--
-- Problems are solved by method
the named fields _and_
have as_dict() and replace() without leading underscores ?
cheers
James
--
-- James Mills
--
-- Problems are solved by method
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe
'. No gain. I might prefer _asdict to _as_dict, but
not enough to change.
Probably a stupid idea (sorry) but one could just
make asdict() and replace() public methods
with the caveat that developers not use those
as field names.
cheers
James
--
-- James Mills
--
-- Problems are solved by method
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Would it make sense for ‘NaN’ to be another instance of ‘NoneType’?
This is fine IHMO as I (personally) find myself doing things like:
if x is None:
...
cheers
James
--
-- James Mills
--
-- Problems are solved
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 9:15 AM, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 21:19 +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
Many Python module developers do not want their work to be distributed
by Debian (and probably by other Linux distributions), here's a list of
Thanks! Not just
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
I should point out that I am in no way responsible for the migration.
I think Dirkjan and Brett said they would tackle this after the 2.7
release. But they'd better answer by themselves :)
I'm willing to help out if
17 matches
Mail list logo
