Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 03:21:30 am MRAB wrote:
What about stderr? You could add "e" if you want to read from it.
"Read from stderr" is just a read. "Write to stderr" is just a write.
The difference between reading stdout and stderr is
John Machin wrote:
Hi Matthew,
Your post in c.l.py about your re rewrite didn't mention where to report
bugs etc so I dug this address out of Google Groups ...
Environment: Python 2.6.2, Windows XP SP3, your latest (29 July) regex
from the Python bugtracker.
Problem is repeated calls of e.
Nick Coghlan wrote:
Mark Hammond wrote:
On 5/08/2009 7:09 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
I'm not sure how win32text will provide anything other than
performance degradation for non-Windows developers, but if there's
functionality to be had, I'm happy to mandate its use on every
platform.
I see two
Nick Coghlan wrote:
P.J. Eby wrote:
At 05:59 PM 8/5/2009 -0700, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
[Jeffrey E. McAninch, PhD]
I very often want something like a try-except conditional expression
similar
to the if-else conditional.
An example of the proposed syntax might be:
x = float(string) except
Dino Viehland wrote:
On option 1 is this legal then?
x = float(string) except float('nan') if some_check() else float('inf') if
ValueError
Well, is this is legal?
try:
x = float(string)
except some_check():
x = float('nan')
except ValueError:
x = float('in
Dino Viehland wrote:
MRAB wrote:
Dino Viehland wrote:
On option 1 is this legal then?
x = float(string) except float('nan') if some_check() else float('inf') if
ValueError
Well, is this is legal?
try:
x = float(string)
except some_check():
Russell E. Owen wrote:
In article ,
Xavier Morel wrote:
On 6 Aug 2009, at 00:22 , Jeff McAninch wrote:
I'm new to this list, so please excuse me if this topic has been
discussed, but I didn't
see anything similar in the archives.
I very often want something like a try-except conditional e
Jeff McAninch wrote:
Should be legal, right?, since syntax would be
except if
Dino Viehland wrote:
On option 1 is this legal then?
x = float(string) except float('nan') if some_check() else
float('inf') if ValueError
Thinking more about the syntax options: if P.J.'s "if" Option is u
James Y Knight wrote:
On Sep 2, 2009, at 6:15 AM, Rob Cliffe wrote:
So - the syntax restriction seems not only inconsistent, but
pointless; it doesn't forbid anything, but merely means we have to do
it in a slightly convoluted (unPythonesque) way. So please, Guido,
will you reconsider?
Ind
[Oops! Hit Send to soon]
Pascal Chambon wrote:
Hello everyone
I'm currently working on a reimplementation of io.FileIO, which would
allow cross-platform file range locking and all kinds of other safety
features ; however I'm slightly stuck due to some specification
fuzziness in the IO docs.
James Y Knight wrote:
On Sep 18, 2009, at 3:55 PM, MRAB wrote:
I think that this should be an invariant:
0 <= file pointer <= file size
so the file pointer might sometimes have to be moved.
As for the question of whether 'truncate' should be able to lengthen a
file,
Pascal Chambon wrote:
Hello
After weighing up here and that, here is what I have come with. Comments
and issue notifications more than welcome, of course. The exception
thingy is not yet addressed.
Regards,
Pascal
*Truncate and file pointer semantics*
Rationale :
The current implementati
Greg Ewing wrote:
Pascal Chambon wrote:
Concerning the naming of truncate(), would it be possible to
deprecate it and alias it to "resize()" ? It's not very gratifying to
have duplicated methods at the beginning of a major release, but I
feel too that "truncate" is a misleading term, that h
Pascal Chambon wrote:
Daniel Stutzbach a écrit :
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 4:48 AM, Pascal Chambon
mailto:chambon.pas...@gmail.com>> wrote:
*RawIOBase*.readinto(b: bytes) -> int
"bytes" are immutable. The signature is:
*RawIOBase*.readinto(b: bytearray) -> int
Your efforts in working on
Dino Viehland wrote:
Is there a reason or a rule by which CPython reports different error
message for different failures to subscript?
For example:
>>> set()[2]
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
TypeError: 'set' object does not support indexing
>>> class c
Janzert wrote:
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 06:47:41 am Dino Viehland wrote:
So I am +1 on unified the message and +1 on using the "does not
support indexing" one.
I'd be +1 on the unified message as well - but it seems what that
message should be may be contentious (and quite a
Ben Finney wrote:
Steven D'Aprano writes:
As far as I can see, in practice, people talk about obj[i] as the item
at index i, not the item at subscript i -- the term "subscript" in
this context seems to be rare to non-existent except for the error
message.
Presumably, the same people would al
waqas ahmad wrote:
Hi,
I dont know it is the right place to post this question. I need help to
change one search code line . can you help me please.
here is my search method code:
search=re.compile("^#acl InternationalGroup.*\n", re.M).search(pagetext)
if search:
ret=search.gr
Pascal Chambon wrote:
Hello
Below is a corrected version of the PEP update, adding the start/end
indexes proposition and fixing functions signatures. Does anyone
disagree with these specifications ? Or can we consider it as a target
for the next versions of the io module ?
I would have no pro
Pascal Chambon wrote:
> Found in current io PEP :
> Q: Do we want to mandate in the specification that switching between
> reading and writing on a read-write object implies a .flush()? Or is
> that an implementation convenience that users should not rely on?
> -> it seems that the only important
Steven Bethard wrote:
I thought it might be useful for those who don't have time to read a
million posts to have a summary of what's happened in the formatting
discussion.
The basic problem is that many APIs in the standard library and
elsewhere support only %-formatting and not {}-formatting, e
Mark Dickinson wrote:
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Steven Bethard wrote:
I thought it might be useful for those who don't have time to read a
million posts to have a summary of what's happened in the formatting
discussion.
Definitely useful. Thanks for the summary!
[...]
* Add a parame
Antoine Pitrou wrote:
MRAB mrabarnett.plus.com> writes:
Another possibility:
A StringFormat class with subclasses PercentStringFormat,
BraceStringFormat, and perhaps DollarStringFormat.
Or:
A StringFormat class with methods parse_percent_format,
parse_brace_format,
Vinay Sajip wrote:
Brett Cannon python.org> writes:
Why don't we start something in the sandbox and see how far we can
get. If no one beats me to it I will add the directory some time today
and we can start hashing out the solution there.
I've done a first cut of a converter from %-format t
Terry Reedy wrote:
Steven Bethard wrote:
I thought it might be useful for those who don't have time to read a
million posts to have a summary of what's happened in the formatting
discussion.
definitely
The basic problem is that many APIs in the standard library and
elsewhere support only %-
Vinay Sajip wrote:
Raymond Hettinger rcn.com> writes:
We should get one written. ISTM, every %-formatting
string is directly translatable to an equivalent {}-formatting string.
I'm not sure you can always get equivalent output from the formatting, though.
For example:
"%0#8x" % 0x1234
'0x
Eric Smith wrote:
Vinay Sajip wrote:
BTW I sent Eric a private mail re. the "0o" versus "0" issue, to see
if it was
worth raising an enhancement request on the bug tracker using "O" to
generate
compatible rendering for octals.
I didn't get your message, could you resend?.
I was thinking the
Vinay Sajip wrote:
Thanks to
http://bugs.python.org/issue7077
I've noticed that the socket-based logging handlers - SocketHandler,
DatagramHandler and SysLogHandler - aren't Unicode-aware and can break in the
presence of Unicode messages. I'd like to fix this by giving these handlers an
option
Masklinn wrote:
On 11 Oct 2009, at 13:36 , Tarek Ziadé wrote:
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Ben Finney
wrote:
"Stephen J. Turnbull" writes:
Trimming can be a PITA if you're using a crummy MUA
How so? It merely requires the ability to navigate up and down by lines,
and to select and del
David Bolen wrote:
[snip]
I think the other issue most likely to cause a perceived "downtime"
with the Windows build slave that I've had a handful of cases over the
past two years where the build slave appears to be operating properly,
but the master seems to just queue up jobs as if it were down
Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
I've checked draft (!) PEP 3003, "Python Language Moratorium", into
SVN. As authors I've listed Jesse, Brett and myself.
I haven't seen substantial opposition against the PEP -- in fact I
can't recall any, and man
Matthew Woodcraft wrote:
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Why do you think it is okay to combine the Disallow vote, without also
combining the Allow vote? Less than a third of the total votes are in
favour of disallowing comments, with two-thirds in favour of allowing
them.
I don't. I was giving one e
Benjamin Peterson wrote:
2009/11/15 Michael Foord :
Well, personally I think it would be a good thing if this raised an
exception during bytecode compilation - but it would fall under the
moratorium and have to wait a few years.
It could probably be considered a bug, though, since the global
s
Terry Reedy wrote:
Tarek Ziadé wrote:
Hello,
On behalf of the Distutils-SIG, I would like to propose PEP 386 for
inclusion in the sdtlib, and have a final discussion here on
Python-dev.
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0386
Some English copy editor comments:
"and it will optionally allow
John Arbash Meinel wrote:
Roy Hyunjin Han wrote:
While debugging a network algorithm in Python 2.6.2, I encountered
some strange behavior and was wondering whether it has to do with some
sort of code optimization that Python does behind the scenes.
After initialization: defaultdic
Tarek Ziadé wrote:
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 1:41 AM, Sridhar Ratnakumar
wrote:
[..]
Tarek,
I am a bit confused at the current proposal combined with the newly
introduced range operator.
Would "Requires-Python: <=2.5" include 2.5.4 or not?
<=2.5 means any version that is inferior or equal to
Ben Finney wrote:
Tarek Ziadé writes:
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 1:41 AM, Sridhar Ratnakumar
wrote:
Also, "Requires-Python: 3" would include all 3.X versions, correct?
Correct, because, "Requires-Python: 3" is equivalent to
"Requires-Python: ~= 3" which is equivalent to "Requires-Python:
3.x.x
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
No application developer will quickly figure out what a tilde means. Maybe
it means 'roughly', but it requires too much thought and is ambiguous. 2.5
is not roughly 2.5.2. It is the same exactly.
Before we had : Requires-Python: 2.5, 2.6
That made much more sense. It was
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
2009-12-28 02:17:22 Ben Finney napisał(a):
Tarek Ziadé writes:
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 1:41 AM, Sridhar Ratnakumar
wrote:
Also, "Requires-Python: 3" would include all 3.X versions, correct?
Correct, because, "Requires-Python: 3" is equivalent to
"
Antoine Pitrou wrote:
David Lyon preisshare.net> writes:
Requires a particular python version.
> Requires-Python: 2.5:2.7
Why not drop ranges as well as operators and simply use commas?
The above would be rewritten as:
Requires-Python: 2.5, 2.6, 2.7
This would prevent the ambiguity on th
David Lyon wrote:
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 1:15 AM, Tarek Ziade wrote:
This new operator removes the ambiguity the original proposal had,
without making it more
complex for common use cases. So if you dislike it, you will need to
propose something
else that also fixes the ambiguity we had.
Ok.
Hi,
I've been wondering whether it's possible to release the GIL in the
regex engine during matching.
I know that it needs to have the GIL during memory-management calls, but
does it for calls like Py_UNICODE_TOLOWER or PyErr_SetString? Is there
an easy way to find out? Or is it just a case of c
Guido van Rossum wrote:
I'm a little hesitant about this. First of all, UTF-8 + BOM is crazy
talk. And for the other two, perhaps it would make more sense to have
a separate encoding-guessing function that takes a binary stream and
returns a text stream wrapping it with the proper encoding?
Alte
Victor Stinner wrote:
Le vendredi 08 janvier 2010 05:21:04, Guido van Rossum a écrit :
(...)
(And yes, I know this happens. Doesn't mean we need to auto-guess by
default; there are lots of issues e.g. what should happen after
seeking to offset 0?)
I wrote a new version of my patch (version 3):
Glenn Linderman wrote:
On approximately 1/8/2010 3:59 PM, came the following characters from
the keyboard of Victor Stinner:
Hi,
Thanks for all the answers! I will try to sum up all ideas here.
One concern I have with this implementation encoding="BOM" is that if
there is no BOM it assumes U
Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 11:37, Walter Dörwald wrote:
UTF-8 might be a good choice
No, fallback if there is no BOM should be the local settings, just as
fallback is today if you don't specify a codec.
I mean, what if you want to look for a BOM but fall back to something
Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:06, "Martin v. Löwis"
wrote:
I know you are just looking for a compromise, but this shouldn't be
it: the PSF has deliberately stayed out of the actual Python
engineering, so the release that Benjamin makes is not done by the
PSF (but by Benjamin
Hi all,
I'm back on the regex module after doing other things and I'd like your
opinion on a number of matters:
Firstly, the current re module has a bug whereby it doesn't split on
zero-width matches. The BDFL has said that this behaviour should be
retained by default in case any existing softwa
Terry Reedy wrote:
On 1/12/2010 5:10 PM, MRAB wrote:
Hi all,
I'm back on the regex module after doing other things and I'd like your
opinion on a number of matters:
Firstly, the current re module has a bug whereby it doesn't split on
zero-width matches. The BDFL has said that
MRAB wrote:
Hi all,
I'm back on the regex module after doing other things and I'd like your
opinion on a number of matters:
Firstly, the current re module has a bug whereby it doesn't split on
zero-width matches. The BDFL has said that this behaviour should be
retained by defa
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
The only supported default encodings in Python are:
Python 2.x: ASCII
Python 3.x: UTF-8
Is this true?
For 3.x: yes. However, the default encoding is much less relevant in
3.x, since Python will never implicitly use the default encoding, except
when some C module
Ben Finney wrote:
Vitor Bosshard writes:
foo.py
foo.pyc # < 2.7 or < 3.2
foo.27.pyc
foo.32.pyc
etc.
This is simpler and more logical than the current subfolder proposal,
as it is clear which version each file corresponds to. Python can use
all the magic values it wants, but please don't spil
Vitor Bosshard wrote:
2010/1/31 Georg Brandl :
foo.py
foo.pyr/
cpython-25.pyc
cpython-25U.pyc
cpython-27.pyc
cpython-27U.pyc
cpython-32.pyc
unladen-011.pyc
wpython-11.pyc
+1. It should be quite easy to assign a new name every time the magic
number is updated.
If we don't change
Reid Kleckner wrote:
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
That still leaves the question of what to do with __file__ (for which
even the solution in the PEP isn't particularly clean). Perhaps the
thing to do there is to have __file__ always point to the source file
and introduce
Silke von Bargen wrote:
That still leaves the question of what to do with __file__ (for which
even the solution in the PEP isn't particularly clean). Perhaps the
thing to do there is to have __file__ always point to the source file
and introduce a __file_cached__ that points to the bytecompiled
Vlastimil Brom wrote:
Vlastimil Brom added the comment:
I just tested the fix for unicode tracebacks and found some possibly weird
results (not sure how/whether it should be fixed, as these inputs are indeed
rather artificial...).
(win XPp SP3 Czech, Python 2.6.4)
Using the cmd console, the
I've thought of a possible additional feature for my regex module and
I'm looking for opinions.
Occasionally there's a question about matching multiple regexes and
someone might suggest combining them into one regex using "|".
The feature would be to allow regex.compile, etc, to accept a list or
I've just downloaded the daily snapshot at
http://svn.python.org/snapshots/python.tar.bz2
In the header file /python/Modules/unicodedata_db.h, there are the
following lines in the change_records_3_2_0 struct:
{ 255, 255, 255, 255, 1.0 },
{ 255, 255, 255, 255, 2.0 },
{ 25
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc wrote:
2010/4/4 MRAB :
I've just downloaded the daily snapshot at
http://svn.python.org/snapshots/python.tar.bz2
In the header file /python/Modules/unicodedata_db.h, there are the
following lines in the change_records_3_2_0 struct:
{ 255, 255, 255
Hi all,
I re-implemented the re module, adding new features and speed
improvements. It's available at:
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/regex
under the name "regex" so that it can be tried alongside "re".
I'd be interested in any comments or feedback. How does it compare with
"re" in terms of s
Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 5:52 AM, MRAB wrote:
Hi all,
I re-implemented the re module, adding new features and speed
improvements. It's available at:
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/regex
under the name "regex" so that it can be tried alongside "re&quo
Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 7:54 AM, MRAB wrote:
You should be able to replace:
import re
with:
import regex as re
and still have everything work the same, ie it's backwards compatible
with re.
That's not what I'm asking. I'm asking what ha
anatoly techtonik wrote:
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:52 PM, MRAB wrote:
Hi all,
I re-implemented the re module, adding new features and speed
improvements. It's available at:
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/regex
under the name "regex" so that it can be tried alongside "re&
Collin Winter wrote:
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 10:28 AM, MRAB wrote:
anatoly techtonik wrote:
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:52 PM, MRAB wrote:
Hi all,
I re-implemented the re module, adding new features and speed
improvements. It's available at:
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/regex
unde
It looks like the bug tracker is down.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
I can't get http://pypi.python.org and I've double-checked using
http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/option
The regex module calls _PyUnicode_IsWhitespace, which is mapped by
unicodeobject.h to either _PyUnicodeUCS2_IsWhitespace or
_PyUnicodeUCS4_IsWhitespace.
From Python 2.5 to Python 3.1 the library pythonXX.lib contains either
_PyUnicodeUCS2_IsWhitespace or _PyUnicodeUCS4_IsWhitespace.
However, in
On 09/12/2010 05:57, Alexander Belopolsky wrote:
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:47 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
..
However, in Python 3.2b1 the library python32.lib contains only
_PyUnicode_IsWhitespace, therefore breaking the build.
Is this change intentional? If so, why does unicodeobject.h still
On 09/12/2010 23:35, Daniel Stutzbach wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 6:56 PM, MRAB mailto:pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com>> wrote:
Is this change intentional? If so, why does unicodeobject.h still do
the mapping?
In 3.2b1, unicodeobject.h doesn't map _PyUnicode_IsWhites
I had a thought about locale-specific formatting.
Currently, when we want to do locale-specific formatting we use the
locale module like this:
>>> locale.format("%d", 12345, grouping=False)
'12345'
>>> locale.format("%d", 12345, grouping=True)
'12,345'
This makes it harder to use more than one
On 18/12/2010 09:26, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
Comments?
How do you implement that? In particular, how do you retrieve
information for different locales in a single program?
The locale module would be able to return a named locale dict:
>>> loc = locale.getnamedlocale('en_UK')
or:
>>> loc =
On 19/12/2010 00:31, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
Am 18.12.2010 19:26, schrieb MRAB:
On 18/12/2010 09:26, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
Comments?
How do you implement that? In particular, how do you retrieve
information for different locales in a single program?
The locale mod
On 03/03/2011 15:09, Graham Stratton wrote:
On Mar 2, 3:01 pm, Graham Stratton wrote:
We are using marshal for serialising objects before distributing them
around the cluster, and extremely occasionally a corrupted marshal is
produced. The current workaround is to serialise everything twice and
Some of those who are relative new to regexes sometimes ask how to write
a regex which checks that a number is in a range or is a valid date.
Although this may be possible, it certainly isn't easy.
From what I've read, Perl has a way of including code in a regex, but I
don't think that's a goo
Someone over at StackOverflow has a problem with urlopen in Python 3.2.1:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6892573/problem-with-urlopen/6892843#6892843
This is the code:
from urllib.request import urlopen
f =
urlopen('http://online.wsj.com/mdc/public/page/2_3020-tips.html?mod=topnav
On 27/08/2011 00:08, Tom Christiansen wrote:
"M.-A. Lemburg" wrote
on Sat, 27 Aug 2011 01:00:31 +0200:
The good part is that it's based on the re code, the FUD comes
from the fact that the new lib is 380kB larger than the old one
and that's not even counting the generated 500kB of lookup
t
I've just come across an omission in re.sub which I hadn't noticed
before.
In re.sub the replacement string can contain escape sequences, for
example:
>>> repr(re.sub(r"x", r"\n", "axb"))
"'a\\nb'"
However:
>>> repr(re.sub(r"x", r"\x0A", "axb"))
"'ax0Ab'"
Yes, it doesn't recognise "\xNN".
On 11/12/2011 20:27, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 12:12 PM, MRAB
wrote:
I've just come across an omission in re.sub which I hadn't noticed
before.
In re.sub the replacement string can contain escape sequences, for
example:
repr(re.sub(r"x", r&q
On 11/12/2011 21:04, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 12:47 PM, MRAB wrote:
On 11/12/2011 20:27, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 12:12 PM, MRAB
wrote:
I've just come across an omission in re.sub which I hadn't noticed
before.
In re.sub the replacem
(I've been having trouble with my email recently, so I missed this
thread amongst others.)
I personally am no longer that bothered about whether the regex module
makes it into stdlib, but I am still be maintaining it on PyPI. If
someone else wants to integrate it I would, of course, be willing to
On 05/06/2012 01:31, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
MRAB wrote:
I personally am no longer that bothered about whether the regex module
makes it into stdlib, but I am still be maintaining it on PyPI. If
someone else wants to integrate it I would, of course, be willing to
help out.
Ar
On 05/06/2012 03:40, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 6/4/2012 9:22 PM, MRAB wrote:
I'm not planning any further changes to regex. I think it already has
enough features...
Do you have any idea where regex + Python stands in regard to Unicode
TR18 support levels? http://unicode.org/reports
On 06/06/2012 02:57, Alexander Belopolsky wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Greg Ewing wrote:
What would be so bad about giving datetime objects
a DST flag? Apps that don't care could ignore it and
get results no worse than the status quo.
This would neatly solve the round-trip proble
It looks like PyPI is down. :-(
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
On 14/06/2012 15:15, Georg Brandl wrote:
Am 13.06.2012 23:59, schrieb sandro.tosi:
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/744fb52ffdf0
changeset: 77417:744fb52ffdf0
branch: 2.7
parent: 77408:60a7b704de5c
user:Sandro Tosi
date:Wed Jun 13 23:58:35 2012 +0200
summary:
On 18/06/2012 00:55, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Would it make sense to detect and reject these in 3.3 if the 2.7 syntax is
used?
Possibly - I'm trying not to actually *change* any of the internals of
the string literal processing, though. (I
On 22/06/2012 17:39, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 6/22/2012 6:57 AM, larry.hastings wrote:
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/ace45d23628a
changeset: 77567:ace45d23628a
user:Larry Hastings
date:Fri Jun 22 03:56:29 2012 -0700
summary:
Issue #14769: test_capi now has SkipitemTest, whi
On 22/06/2012 21:45, Larry Hastings wrote:
On 06/22/2012 01:29 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
Of course. And character 32 is also not usable and perhaps not
worth testing.
Au contraire! I grant you, it's hard to imagine how using it would be a
good idea. But strictly speaking it is *usable*. (And
On 27/07/2012 20:12, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
2012/7/26 Thomas Heller :
Will there be more 2.7 bugfix releases, and when the next one?
Probably late fall or early 2013.
Or, for those in the southern hemisphere, late spring or early 2013.
___
Python
On 03/08/2012 19:53, Dheeraj Goswami wrote:
Hi Python Gurus,
I am an experienced Java developer and have been working on it for about
8 years. I need to build a web 2.0/AJAX based website/application and I
am thinking to build it in Django which means I need to learn and move
to Python.
Please a
On 03/08/2012 21:46, Chris Jerdonek wrote:
I would like people's opinions on issue 15510, specifically whether it
should be addressed and in what versions:
http://bugs.python.org/issue15510
Jesús suggested that I ask. The issue relates to textwrap.wrap()'s
behavior when wrapping strings that c
On 05/08/2012 23:31, Mark Lawrence wrote:
Hi all,
I keep an eye open for this but can't find one for Saturday 03/08/2012.
Have I missed it, has it been stopped, has something gone wrong with
its production or what?
I haven't seen it either.
___
Py
On 13/08/2012 02:39, Python Urlopen wrote:
[snip]
After a lot of pain, I got myself out of this trouble, and my code
now works correctly on 2.7.x (thanks to Jean-Paul Calderone's
pyopenssl). But do "you" think this is a "feature" and not a "bug"?
-- And do you think debating on this, killing
On 18/08/2012 18:34, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 6:28 AM, Christian Heimes wrote:
Am 17.08.2012 21:27, schrieb Guido van Rossum:
I wonder if it wouldn't make sense to change urlencode() to generate
URLs that don't depend on the hash order, for all versions of Python
that su
On 31/08/2012 02:43, Gregory P. Smith wrote:
We have use for _PyBytes_Join in an extension module but technically it
isn't a public Python C API... anyone know why?
PyUnicode_Join is.
Looking up the bytes 'join' method and using the C API to call that
method object with proper parameters seems
On 11/09/2012 13:06, Victor Stinner wrote:
* Call builtin functions if arguments are constants. Examples:
- len("abc") => 3
- ord("A") => 65
Does it preserve python semantics? What if you change the len builtin?
This optimization is disabled by default (in the version 0.3), because
built
On 11/09/2012 22:46, Victor Stinner wrote:
2012/9/11 Nick Coghlan :
This is fine in an external project, but should never be added to the
standard library. The barrier to semantic changes that break
monkeypatching should be high.
The version 0.3 has a known bug: "len=chr; print(len('A'))" is
o
On 2012-09-30 01:43, Jan Kaliszewski wrote:
Hello,
In http://docs.python.org/release/3.2.3/reference/expressions.html#in
we read: "[...] This can create the illusion of non-transitivity between
supported cross-type comparisons and unsupported comparisons. For
example, Decimal(2) == 2 and 2 == fl
On 2012-09-30 19:55, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
On 30.09.12 16:15, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Probably, but for most purposes I would guess a 2-year old database is
still good enough? After all, you don't see many people complaining
about the outdated Unicode database that is hard-wired in past Pythons.
On 2012-10-03 16:28, Brian Curtin wrote:
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Larry Hastings wrote:
On 10/03/2012 04:55 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Regardless of when the first alpha happens, I'll be promoting the hell
out of it, begging for feedback on any of these changes that are
available by then
401 - 500 of 514 matches
Mail list logo
