On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Sturla Molden stu...@molden.no wrote:
Terry Reedy:
MingW has become less attractive in recent years by the difficulty
in downloading and installing a current version and finding out how to
do so. Some projects have moved on to the TDM packaging of MingW.
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 4:06 AM, Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Case Vanhorsen cas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 3:07 AM, Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com wrote
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Case Vanhorsen cas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 4:06 AM, Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com wrote:
What external modules are there that rely on existing hash behaviour
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 3:07 AM, Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com wrote:
Making hashes of int,
float, Decimal *and* Fraction all compatible with one another,
efficient for ints and floats, and not grossly inefficient
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 12:49 AM, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
Several questions come to mind:
1) Is it reasonable to provide backward compatibility files (either as
.h or .c) to provide support to new API calls to extension authors?
I'm skeptical. In my experience, each
Hello,
When I ported gmpy (Python to GMP multiple precision library) to
Python 3.x, I began to use PyLong_AsLongAndOverflow frequently. I
found the code to slightly faster and cleaner than using PyLong_AsLong
and checking for overflow. I looked at making PyLong_AsLongAndOverflow
available to
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
IMHO, that's not really a good way to encourage people to try to provide
a smooth upgrade to the 3.x branch. Much to the contrary. 3.x should make
it easier for developers by providing more standard helpers like
the
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Peter Moodype...@hda3.com wrote:
The pep has been updated with the excellent suggestions thus far.
Are there any more?
Thanks for writing the PEP.
I tried a few of the common scenarios that I use at work. Disclaimer:
my comments are based on my work
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
We could remove it, but then what we have wouldn't really be a release
candidate anymore, so the release would get delayed.
How long do release candidates soak in the field before being accepted?
For this release, the
