On 2011-08-27, at 2:20 PM, Dan Stromberg wrote:
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Brian Curtin brian.cur...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 11:48, Dan Stromberg drsali...@gmail.com wrote:
No, this was not the intent of __future__. The intent is that a
feature is desirable but also
knowledgable about the dev process
of Python than you, why it can't work.
Also, not being keen on following the documented process is a good
indication, IMHO, of unprofessionalism.
--
Virgil Dupras
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http
intensively and to observably good results?
Virgil Dupras
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
to be checked in is to add a test, but even then, sometimes, patches fade
into oblivion and you might have to regularly freshen your diff to match with
the trunk so it applies cleanly.
Virgil Dupras
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http
Virgil Dupras
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
documentation that
recommends to use your new class in case they want a painless way to
replace list usage (to make the life of those poor developers
maintaining other people's code easier), maybe even add it in stdlib's
collections unit.
--
Virgil Dupras
On 06 Dec 2008, at 20:38, Warren DeLano wrote:
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 22:22:38 -0800
From: Dennis Lee Bieber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: as keyword woes
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm still in the dark as to what type of data could
even inspire the
use of
I would also like to point out that I submitted a patch related to
that a couple of months ago in:
http://bugs.python.org/issue839159
But it never got any attention :( I'm not sure if it is still relevant.
Virgil
On 13-Sep-08, at 10:20 PM, Armin Ronacher wrote:
Hi everybody,
In Python
but I couldn't find it.
Additionally, one thing that strikes me as strange is how hard it is
to find a Migration guide on the website. I had to dig in the PEP
3000 to find the brief bullet list telling me to run py26 with the -3
flag.
Virgil Dupras
...
Virgil Dupras
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
is relevant or not, is it more appropriate to create a ticket for it
or to ask python-dev?
Virgil Dupras
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman
On 2/23/08, Christian Heimes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have over 1,700 open issues - bug reports, feature requests and
patches - in our bug tracker. In my humble opinion it's a sure sign for
a problem.
There is also 12000 closed tickets, with 1200 of them having been
closed in the last 6
On 2/21/08, Nick Coghlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Virgil Dupras wrote:
On 2/21/08, Virgil Dupras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi devs,
Being a python dev newbie, I look in http://www.python.org/dev/ for
some guide to write unit tests in python and I can't find any.
Specifically
On 2/21/08, Facundo Batista [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the result for the open status issues? I guess not, because
the rejected, fixed, etc, should be closed.
Could you run this again, please, but filtering by open tickets?
I don't see why would want to run this query on open tickets.
On 2/19/08, Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I don't, which is why I would find it interesting to run some
queries on the roundup database to have completion statistics for low
activity tickets. Is is possible to get a copy of that db somehow?
I would rather not make it
On 2/18/08, Facundo Batista [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Don't now if always, or in the last few months where I've been
following the issues more closely, but I found that are appearing a
lot of small RFEs in the tracker.
These normally are small but not trivial things. In most cases when I
On 2/18/08, Brett Cannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 18, 2008 11:11 AM, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
-On [20080218 13:38], Virgil Dupras ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Personally, I think that a bug tracker is a good place to keep RFE
On 2/18/08, Steve Holden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure we should be throwing RFE's away with such casual abandon
just because nobody had time to pay them any attention in six months -
nor bugs neither, come to that.
Well, we have to evaluate the chances of our older tickets to come to
On 2/19/08, Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, we have to evaluate the chances of our older tickets to come to
completion. I'm of the opinion that ticket getting older have very
small chances of ever being completed. RFE for python 2.4 are likely
to be irrelevant.
Do you have
19 matches
Mail list logo
