Am 13.12.2010 21:08, schrieb Glenn Linderman:
On 12/13/2010 11:39 AM, Mark Dickinson wrote:
my_thing = Thing(
foo = Foo(arg1, arg2, ...),
bar = Bar(arg3, arg4, ...),
...
)
and I've found the trailing comma very convenient during refactoring
and API experimentation.
On 12/18/2010 1:04 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
Am 13.12.2010 21:08, schrieb Glenn Linderman:
On 12/13/2010 11:39 AM, Mark Dickinson wrote:
my_thing = Thing(
foo = Foo(arg1, arg2, ...),
bar = Bar(arg3, arg4, ...),
...
)
and I've found the trailing comma very convenient during
Terry Reedy wrote:
On 12/13/2010 2:17 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:09:02 -0500
Alexander Belopolskyalexander.belopol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Guido van Rossumgu...@python.org
wrote:
I'm at least +0 on
allowing trailing commas in the
Dear Python Developers,
It is s my first post to python-dev, so let me introduce myself briefly:
Jan Kaliszewski, programmer and composer, sometimes also NGO activist.
Coming to the matter... The discussion started with remark by Mark
Dickinson about such a syntax oddity:
def f(a, b,): ...
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 9:44 PM, Jan Kaliszewski z...@chopin.edu.pl wrote:
I think that seeing that:
def f(a, b): ...
def f(a, *, b): ...
def f(a, *args, b): ...
x(1, 2, 3, 4, z=5)
x(1, *(2,3,4), z=5)
As per the closure of the affected tickets, the likely outcome of such
a
On 13/12/2010 13:25, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 9:44 PM, Jan Kaliszewskiz...@chopin.edu.pl wrote:
I think that seeing that:
def f(a, b): ...
def f(a, *, b): ...
def f(a, *args, b): ...
x(1, 2, 3, 4, z=5)
x(1, *(2,3,4), z=5)
As per the closure of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/13/2010 08:25 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 9:44 PM, Jan Kaliszewski z...@chopin.edu.pl wrote:
I think that seeing that:
def f(a, b): ...
def f(a, *, b): ...
def f(a, *args, b): ...
x(1, 2, 3, 4, z=5)
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:42 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
I actually make use of the feature when dealing with APIs which both a)
take lots of arguments (more than fit comfortably on two lines at
whatever indentation they are called), and b) have optional trailing
arguments:
Nick Coghlan dixit (2010-12-13, 23:25):
Function arguments are not lists. Even when separated onto multiple
lines, the closing ): should remain on the final line with other
content.
Not necessarily, IMHO.
1.
What about my example with '- xxx' return-value annotation? (especially
when that
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 23:25:58 +1000, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 9:44 PM, Jan Kaliszewski z...@chopin.edu.pl wrote:
I think that seeing that:
=A0 =A0def f(a, b): ...
=A0 =A0def f(a, *, b): ...
=A0 =A0def f(a, *args, b): ...
=A0 =A0x(1, 2, 3, 4, z=3D5)
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 5:42 AM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
I actually make use of the feature when dealing with APIs which both a)
take lots of arguments (more than fit comfortably on two lines at
whatever indentation they are called), and b) have optional trailing
arguments: I
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
I'm at least +0 on
allowing trailing commas in the situation the OP mentioned.
FWIW, I am also about +0.5 on allowing trailing comma. Note that in a
similar situation, the C standardization committee has erred on the
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:09:02 -0500
Alexander Belopolsky alexander.belopol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
I'm at least +0 on
allowing trailing commas in the situation the OP mentioned.
FWIW, I am also about +0.5 on allowing
On 12/13/2010 11:17 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:09:02 -0500
Alexander Belopolskyalexander.belopol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Guido van Rossumgu...@python.org wrote:
I'm at least +0 on
allowing trailing commas in the situation the OP mentioned.
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 3:51 PM, R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com wrote:
It seems like the status quo is fine. I wouldn't object to it being
made more consistent. I would object to removing the existing cases.
Same here, on all three counts. In one of the projects I'm currently
working
On 12/13/2010 11:39 AM, Mark Dickinson wrote:
my_thing = Thing(
foo = Foo(arg1, arg2, ...),
bar = Bar(arg3, arg4, ...),
...
)
and I've found the trailing comma very convenient during refactoring
and API experimentation. (There's still good fun to be had arguing
about the
On 13Dec2010 20:17, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
| On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:09:02 -0500
| Alexander Belopolsky alexander.belopol...@gmail.com wrote:
|
| On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
| I'm at least +0 on
| allowing trailing commas in
On 12/13/2010 2:17 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:09:02 -0500
Alexander Belopolskyalexander.belopol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Guido van Rossumgu...@python.org wrote:
I'm at least +0 on
allowing trailing commas in the situation the OP mentioned.
On Dec 13, 2010, at 1:21 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
Same here. A strong +1 for a consistent rule (always or never allowed) with a
+1 for always given others use case of one param/arg per line.
It seems to me that a trailing comma in an argument list is more likely to be a
user error than a
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Raymond Hettinger
raymond.hettin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 13, 2010, at 1:21 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
Same here. A strong +1 for a consistent rule (always or never allowed) with
a +1 for always given others use case of one param/arg per line.
It seems to
On 12/13/2010 1:55 PM, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
It seems to me that a trailing comma in an argument list is more likely to be a
user error than a deliberate comma-for-the-future.
It seems to me that a trailing comma, especially in the case of one
parameter per line, is a deliberate
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 5:39 AM, Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 3:51 PM, R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com
wrote:
It seems like the status quo is fine. I wouldn't object to it being
made more consistent. I would object to removing the existing cases.
On Dec 13, 2010, at 2:16 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Raymond Hettinger
raymond.hettin...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems to me that a trailing comma in an argument list is more likely to
be a user error than a deliberate comma-for-the-future.
Really? Have you
23 matches
Mail list logo
