On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 01:51:09PM +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info wrote:
Why would a software package called Spam install a top-level module called
Jam rather than Spam? Isn't the whole point of Python packages to solve
this
On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 12:48:45AM -0500, PJ Eby wrote:
Do any of the distro folks know of a Python project tagged as
conflicting with another for their distro, where the conflict does
*not* involve any files in conflict?
In Fedora we do work to avoid most types of Conflicts (backporting
On 09/12/12 08:14, MRAB wrote:
If package A says that it conflicts with package B, it may or may not
be symmetrical, because it's possible that package B has been updated
since the author of package A discovered the conflict, so it's
important that the user is told which package is complaining
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info wrote:
Assuming that two software packages Spam and Ham install into directories
Spam and Ham, how can merely having them installed side-by-side lead to a
conflict?
I can see how running or importing Spam and Ham together
On 09/12/12 12:32, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Steven D'Apranost...@pearwood.info wrote:
Assuming that two software packages Spam and Ham install into directories
Spam and Ham, how can merely having them installed side-by-side lead to a
conflict?
I can see how
On Saturday, December 8, 2012 at 9:11 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Why would a software package called Spam install a top-level module called
Jam rather than Spam? Isn't the whole point of Python packages to solve
this namespace problem?
Conflicts doesn't really solve file based conflicts as PJ
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info wrote:
On 09/12/12 12:32, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Steven D'Apranost...@pearwood.info
wrote:
Assuming that two software packages Spam and Ham install into directories
Spam and Ham, how can
On 2012-12-09 01:15, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On 09/12/12 08:14, MRAB wrote:
If package A says that it conflicts with package B, it may or may not
be symmetrical, because it's possible that package B has been updated
since the author of package A discovered the conflict, so it's
important that
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 10:22 PM, MRAB pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com wrote:
On 2012-12-09 01:15, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On 09/12/12 08:14, MRAB wrote:
If package A says that it conflicts with package B, it may or may not
be symmetrical, because it's possible that package B has been updated
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 3:48 PM, PJ Eby p...@telecommunity.com wrote:
That's why I keep asking for specific, concrete use cases. At this
point, for the field to make any sense, there needs to be some better
idea of what a runtime or undefined conflict is. Apart from file
conflicts, has
10 matches
Mail list logo
