C. Titus Brown wrote:
[...]
I have had a hard time getting a good sense of what core code is well
tested and what is not well tested, across various platforms. While
Walter's C/Python integrated code coverage site is nice, it would be
even nicer to have a way to generate all that
2x keyring package -- see
http://tarekziade.wordpress.com/2009/03/27/pycon-hallway-session-1-a-keyring-library-for-python/.
The poorer one of these will probably be axed unless Tarek gives it
strong support.
I don't think these are good core projects. Even if the students come
up with a
He says vague things about patches too, but I'm not sure what. If he
wanted to make that into a 'patchbot' that just applied every patch in
isolation and ran 'make make test' and posted results in the
tracker I'd be a happy camper.
Jack, how about you write that idea down on the wiki
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 12:21:18PM +0200, Mario wrote:
- He says vague things about patches too, but I'm not sure what. If he
- wanted to make that into a 'patchbot' that just applied every patch in
- isolation and ran 'make make test' and posted results in the
- tracker I'd be a happy
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 08:13:35AM +0200, Martin v. L?wis wrote:
- 2x keyring package -- see
-
http://tarekziade.wordpress.com/2009/03/27/pycon-hallway-session-1-a-keyring-library-for-python/.
- The poorer one of these will probably be axed unless Tarek gives it
- strong support.
-
- I don't
- I'm also skeptical that this is a good SoC project in the first place.
What is a good SoC project from your point of view ?
- Coming up with a wrapper for, say, Apple Keychain, could be a good
- project. Coming up with a unifying API for all keychains is out of
- scope, IMO; various past
Ok what about this then: I am changing the scope a little bit, and I
think the students will be fine with this change
since it's the same work.
The project will consist of creating a plugin system into Distutils
to be able to store and retrieve the username/password
used by some commands, without
I'm using core projects as a shorthand for projects that directly
address the core development environment, the stdlib, and priorities of
committers on python-dev. Tarek is a committer, and it sounded like
you, Jim, and Georg were all interested in this project, too -- that
pushes it well
Tarek Ziadé wrote:
- I'm also skeptical that this is a good SoC project in the first place.
What is a good SoC project from your point of view ?
As a core project - tricky. Implement some long-standing complex feature
request, or fix a pile of outstanding bug reports for a module (like
the
The student will also provide some plugins for a maximum number of
existing keyring systems.
Some of these plugins might be included in Distutils, and some of them
in a third-party package.
This is slightly better, but see my previous message (that is feature
creep in distutils, and likely,
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 4:38 PM, C. Titus Brown c...@msu.edu wrote:
Unquestionably core by my criteria above:
3to2 tool -- 'nuff said.
I worked on the 3to2 tool during the sprint last week at PyCon. I can
chip in for GSoC in the event it does get picked up.
-Ron
PS - I'm out of town next
Hi all,
this year we have 10-12 GSoC applications that I've put in the relevant
to core Python development category. These projects, if mentors etc
are found, are *guaranteed* a slot under the PSF GSoC umbrella. As
backup GSoC admin and general busybody, I've taken on the work of
coordinating
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 5:38 PM, C. Titus Brown c...@msu.edu wrote:
Hi all,
this year we have 10-12 GSoC applications that I've put in the relevant
to core Python development category. These projects, if mentors etc
are found, are *guaranteed* a slot under the PSF GSoC umbrella. As
backup
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 05:53:23PM -0300, Guilherme Polo wrote:
-
- IDLE/Tkinter patch integration improvement -- deal with ~120 tracker
- ? ? ? ?issues relating to IDLE and Tkinter.
-
-
- Is it important, for the discussion, to mention that it also involves
- testing this area (idle and
Well, I think Numpy is of huge importance to a major Python user segment,
the scientific community. I don't know if that makes it 'core', but I
strongly agree that it's important.
Better testing is always useful, and more core, but IMO less important.
-T
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 6:38 AM, C. Titus
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 6:02 PM, C. Titus Brown c...@msu.edu wrote:
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 05:53:23PM -0300, Guilherme Polo wrote:
-
- IDLE/Tkinter patch integration improvement -- deal with ~120 tracker
- ? ? ? ?issues relating to IDLE and Tkinter.
-
-
- Is it important, for the
2009/4/10 C. Titus Brown c...@msu.edu:
2x improve testing tools for py3k -- variously focus on improving test
coverage and testing wrappers.
One proposes to provide a nice wrapper to make nose and py.test
capable of running the regrtests, which (with no change to
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 4:38 PM, C. Titus Brown c...@msu.edu wrote:
[megasnip]
roundup VCS integration / build tools to support core development --
a single student proposed both of these and has received some
support. See http://slexy.org/view/s2pFgWxufI for details.
From the
18 matches
Mail list logo
