Looking at http://docs.python.org/dev/library/html.html#module-html it would
appear that we've created a new module with a single trivial function.
In reality, there was already a python package, html, that served to group two
loosely related modules, html.parser and html.entities.
ISTM, that
Am 24.01.2011 20:04, schrieb Raymond Hettinger:
Looking at http://docs.python.org/dev/library/html.html#module-html it would
appear that we've created a new module with a single trivial function.
In reality, there was already a python package, html, that served to group
two loosely related
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Raymond Hettinger
raymond.hettin...@gmail.com wrote:
ISTM, that if we're going to use python packages as namespace containers for
categorizing modules, then the top level __init__ namespace should be left
empty.
This is only an issue if the separate components
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/24/2011 03:14 PM, Fred Drake wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Raymond Hettinger
raymond.hettin...@gmail.com wrote:
ISTM, that if we're going to use python packages as namespace containers
for
categorizing modules, then the top level
On 1/24/2011 2:18 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
Am 24.01.2011 20:04, schrieb Raymond Hettinger:
Looking at http://docs.python.org/dev/library/html.html#module-html
it would appear that we've created a new module with a single
trivial function.
In reality, there was already a python package, html,
If that pattern is a goal, having all versions of the namespace's
__init__.py empty of anything but the __path__-munging majyk /
boilerplate is required to make such installs work regardless of the
order of PYTHONPATH.
With PEP 382, having extensible packages won't contradict to having
a
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:18, Georg Brandl g.bra...@gmx.net wrote:
Am 24.01.2011 20:04, schrieb Raymond Hettinger:
Looking at http://docs.python.org/dev/library/html.html#module-html it would
appear that we've created a new module with a single trivial function.
In reality, there was already
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
It might matter if we want to enable third-party package installation
into a namespace also used by the stdlib: ISTR that the 'xml' package
had such installs at one point.
Almost, but not quite.
The xml package at one
