On 2018-10-26 19:17, Brett Cannon wrote:
But since you're asking about wanting to "review PEPs", you can review
them now.
Unfortunately not everybody agrees on that...
See
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2018-October/155441.html in
particular
I really hope that I won't have
As a piece of pure experiential data based on some years trying to herd the
PSF cats, if python-dev can find a way of running its activities without
votes needing to be taken I would really emphasise the benefits of the lack
of such administration.
If voting is required, please consider using the
On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 at 13:20, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> What is the timeframe for the installation of the new governance? In
> other words, when will it be possible to review PEPs?
>
PEP 8001 outlines the voting for the governance models which includes a
planned schedule for that vote. After that
What is the timeframe for the installation of the new governance? In
other words, when will it be possible to review PEPs?
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
+1 (for what it's worth) to any proposal which includes one (or more)
GUIDOs :)
S.
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 11:57 AM Victor Stinner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Last July, Guido van Rossum decided to resign from his role of BDFL.
> Python core developers decided to design a new governance/organization
>
Hi,
Last July, Guido van Rossum decided to resign from his role of BDFL.
Python core developers decided to design a new governance/organization
for Python. 6 governance PEPs have been proposed. It has been decided
that discussions are reserved to core developers (everyone can read,
but only core
