Aahz wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005, Michael Chermside wrote:
So I have a counter-proposal. Let's NOT create a hierarchy of abstract
base types for the elementary types of Python. (Even basestring feels
like a minor wart to me, although for now it seems like we need
it.) If the core problem is
Michael Chermside [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So I have a counter-proposal. Let's NOT create a hierarchy of abstract
base types for the elementary types of Python.
+1
Cheers,
mwh
--
bruce how are the jails in israel?
itamar well, the one I was in was pretty nice
Aahz wrote:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
Josiah Carlson wrote:
New superclasses for all built-in types (except for string and unicode,
which already subclass from basestring).
int, float, complex (long) : subclass from basenumber
tuple, list, set : subclass from basesequence
Josiah Carlson writes:
New superclasses for all built-in types (except for string and unicode,
which already subclass from basestring).
int, float, complex (long) : subclass from basenumber
tuple, list, set : subclass from basesequence
dict : subclass from basemapping
The idea is that each
Michael Chermside wrote:
Nick Coghlan writes:
Close enough to on-topic to stay here, I think. However, I tend to think of
the taxonomy as a little less flat:
basecontainer (anything with __len__)
- set
- basemapping (anything with __getitem__)
- dict
- basesequence
Nick Coghlan writes:
Sorry - I meant to indicate that I didn't think the base classes were
necessary because the relevant checks already existed in a does it behave
like one sense:
def is_container(x):
[...]
def is_mapping(x):
[...]
def is_sequence(x):
[...]
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005, Michael Chermside wrote:
So I have a counter-proposal. Let's NOT create a hierarchy of abstract
base types for the elementary types of Python. (Even basestring feels
like a minor wart to me, although for now it seems like we need
it.) If the core problem is how do you
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
Josiah Carlson wrote:
New superclasses for all built-in types (except for string and unicode,
which already subclass from basestring).
int, float, complex (long) : subclass from basenumber
tuple, list, set : subclass from basesequence
dict :
Aahz wrote:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
Josiah Carlson wrote:
New superclasses for all built-in types (except for string and unicode,
which already subclass from basestring).
int, float, complex (long) : subclass from basenumber
tuple, list, set : subclass from basesequence
