On Sep 30, 2006, at 11:13 PM, Scott David Daniels wrote:
Christos Georgiou wrote:
Does anyone know why this happens? I can't find any information
pointing to
this being deliberate.
I just upgraded to 2.5 on Windows (after making sure I can build
extensions
with the freeware VC++ Toolkit
Hi,
Someone reported on the pythonmac list that HAVE_UINTPTR_T wasn't
defined in pyconfig.h while it should have been defined. I'm looking
into this and am now wondering whether the configure snipped below is
correct:
AC_MSG_CHECKING(for uintptr_t support)
have_uintptr_t=no
AC_TRY_COMPILE
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 12:03:03PM -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I see some confusion in this thread.
>
> If a *LITERAL* 0.0 (or any other float literal) is used, you only get
> one object, no matter how many times it is used.
For some reason that doesn't happen in the interpreter which has be
On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 03:21:50PM -0700, Bob Ippolito wrote:
> On 9/30/06, Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Nick Coghlan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > I suspect the problem would typically stem from floating point
> > > values that are read in from a
Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Hans Polak wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> Just an opinion, but many uses of the ‘while true loop’ are instances of
>> a ‘do loop’. I appreciate the language layout question, so I’ll give you
>> an alternative:
>>
>>
>>
>> do:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
On 10/1/06, Ron Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (I don't think this has been suggested yet.)
>
> while , :
>
[snip]
> Putting both the entry and exit conditions at the top is easier to read.
I agree in principle, but I thought the proposed syntax already has
meaning today (as it
> (I don't think this has been suggested yet.)
>
> while , :
>
This usage makes me uneasy, not the least because I don't understand why the
comma isn't creating a tuple. That is, why whould
while x, y:
be any different from
while (x, y):
"Nick Craig-Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 12:03:03PM -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>> I see some confusion in this thread.
>>
>> If a *LITERAL* 0.0 (or any other float literal) is used, you only get
>> one object, no matter how many t
At 12:58 PM 10/1/2006 -0400, Andrew Koenig wrote:
> > (I don't think this has been suggested yet.)
> >
> > while , :
> >
>
>This usage makes me uneasy, not the least because I don't understand why the
>comma isn't creating a tuple. That is, why whould
>
> while x, y:
>
On Sun, 1 Oct 2006 13:54:31 -0400, Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>"Nick Craig-Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 12:03:03PM -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>>> I see some confusion in this thread.
>>>
>>> If a *LITERAL* 0.0 (or an
On Oct 1, 2006, at 10:54 AM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
Hi,
Someone reported on the pythonmac list that HAVE_UINTPTR_T wasn't
defined in pyconfig.h while it should have been defined. I'm
looking into this and am now wondering whether the configure
snipped below is correct:
AC_MSG_CHECKING(
> This pattern:
>
> while entry_cond:
> ...
> and while not exit_cond:
> ...
>
> has been suggested before, and I believe that at least one of the times it
> was suggested, it had some support from Guido. Essentially, the "and
> while not exit" is equivalent to an "
Michael Urman wrote:
> On 10/1/06, Ron Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> (I don't think this has been suggested yet.)
>>
>> while , :
>>
>
> [snip]
>
>> Putting both the entry and exit conditions at the top is easier to read.
>
> I agree in principle, but I thought the proposed sy
On 9/30/06, Giovanni Bajo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It would be terrific if you gave us some clue about what is wrong in PEP355,
> so
> that the next guy does not waste his time. For instance, I find PEP355
> incredibly good for my own path manipulation (much cleaner and concise than
> the
> a
Hi Brett,
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 02:11:30PM -0700, Brett Cannon wrote:
> is so bad that it is worth trying to re-implement the import semantics in
> pure Python or if in the name of time to just work with the C code.
In the name of time, sanity and usefulness, rewriting the expected
semantics in
I was wondering: how many other people who maintain websites (well:
"maintain" might be a bit of a misnomer in my case:-) related to
Python have also got this spam?
Begin forwarded message:
> From: "Snake Tracks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: October 1, 2006 21:21:45 GMT+02:00
> To: Cwi <[EMAIL
Jack Jansen wrote:
> I was wondering: how many other people who maintain websites (well:
> "maintain" might be a bit of a misnomer in my case:-) related to
> Python have also got this spam?
I got it. I was rather amused that they claim to have been
"looking for sites that would make good link
Jack Jansen wrote:
> I was wondering: how many other people who maintain websites (well:
> "maintain" might be a bit of a misnomer in my case:-) related to
> Python have also got this spam?
probably everyone. I've gotten two copies, this far.
__
18 matches
Mail list logo
