Hi Sridhar,
Le 15/10/2010 18:50, Sridhar Ratnakumar a écrit :
We definitely like to share our core Python patches for AIX 5.1/5.2 and other
platforms.
Great to hear that ActiveState shares their improvements for Python on
AIX! Thanks for the patch in git, I will check it and try to open
Hello
[Sorry if this comes twice, connection errors here]
(A bit of context: The original message comes from bug #2775, “Implement
PEP 3108”, a meta-bug tracking stdlib reorganization for py3k.)
I am very glad you're reorganizing the Standard Library. Thumbs up! I
hope everything will comply
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 10:45 PM, Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org wrote:
(A note about PEP 8 compliance: Module names have been mostly fixed, but
not all function/method names, for example in logging and unittest. If
I recall correctly, readability did not seem to make all the rewrites
worth
Hi everyone
[Sorry if this comes twice, connection errors here]
Raymond Hettinger noticed on the tracker that there are different
interpretations of the “accepted” resolution:
Traditionally it denotes an approved patch, not a agreement that the
bug is valid.
Daniel Stutzbach and I are (were)
I am waiting for the bug Issue5111 (httplib: wrong Host header when
connecting to IPv6 litteral URL) to be fixed for a very long.
Even I attached patches, test patches. How to get commit access so that I
can fix such issues ( HTTP lib )
- Chandrasekar
Hello
(A bit of context: The original message comes from bug #2775, “Implement
PEP 3108”, a meta-bug tracking stdlib reorganization for py3k.)
I am very glad you're reorganizing the Standard Library. Thumbs up! I
hope everything will comply to PEP 8 after you're done.
You may have missed the
Hello Chandrasekar,
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 10:05:56PM +0530, chandru wrote:
I am waiting for the bug Issue5111 (httplib: wrong Host header when connecting
to IPv6 litteral URL) to be fixed for a very long.
I just had a look at the bug. Looks like a minor change and tests are
there too. I
Hi everyone
Raymond Hettinger noticed on the tracker that there are different
interpretations of the “accepted” resolution:
Traditionally it denotes an approved patch, not a agreement that the
bug is valid.
Daniel Stutzbach and I are (were) two users of the second meaning. It’s
more useful
On Oct 18, 2010, at 04:04 PM, Éric Araujo wrote:
Raymond Hettinger noticed on the tracker that there are different
interpretations of the “accepted” resolution:
Traditionally it denotes an approved patch, not a agreement that the
bug is valid.
I'm with Raymond; I've always used 'accepted' to
Am 18.10.2010 20:11, schrieb Barry Warsaw:
On Oct 18, 2010, at 04:04 PM, Éric Araujo wrote:
Raymond Hettinger noticed on the tracker that there are different
interpretations of the “accepted” resolution:
Traditionally it denotes an approved patch, not a agreement that the
bug is valid.
On 18/10/2010 19:18, Georg Brandl wrote:
Am 18.10.2010 20:11, schrieb Barry Warsaw:
On Oct 18, 2010, at 04:04 PM, Éric Araujo wrote:
Raymond Hettinger noticed on the tracker that there are different
interpretations of the “accepted” resolution:
Traditionally it denotes an approved patch,
Am 18.10.2010 21:04, schrieb Michael Foord:
On 18/10/2010 19:18, Georg Brandl wrote:
Am 18.10.2010 20:11, schrieb Barry Warsaw:
On Oct 18, 2010, at 04:04 PM, Éric Araujo wrote:
Raymond Hettinger noticed on the tracker that there are different
interpretations of the “accepted” resolution:
On 18/10/2010 20:24, Georg Brandl wrote:
Am 18.10.2010 21:04, schrieb Michael Foord:
On 18/10/2010 19:18, Georg Brandl wrote:
Am 18.10.2010 20:11, schrieb Barry Warsaw:
On Oct 18, 2010, at 04:04 PM, Éric Araujo wrote:
Raymond Hettinger noticed on the tracker that there are different
Am 18.10.2010 21:28, schrieb Michael Foord:
On 18/10/2010 20:24, Georg Brandl wrote:
Am 18.10.2010 21:04, schrieb Michael Foord:
On 18/10/2010 19:18, Georg Brandl wrote:
Am 18.10.2010 20:11, schrieb Barry Warsaw:
On Oct 18, 2010, at 04:04 PM, Éric Araujo wrote:
Raymond Hettinger
http://xiph.org/video/vid1.shtml
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
On 10/18/2010 3:33 PM, Janzert wrote:
http://xiph.org/video/vid1.shtml
Sorry, sent to the wrong place.
Janzert
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 21:31:24 +0200
Georg Brandl g.bra...@gmx.net wrote:
This is probably sophistry, but if an issue is invalid, it doesn't need
a patch :)
Not only, but it generally gets closed too.
The first stage seems to be unit test needed anyway, which
sounds to me a bit like needs to
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 17:20:13 +0200, mer...@netwok.org wrote:
Raymond Hettinger noticed on the tracker that there are different
interpretations of the âacceptedâ resolution:
Traditionally it denotes an approved patch, not a agreement that the
bug is valid.
Daniel Stutzbach and I are
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 21:42:08 +0200, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 21:31:24 +0200
Georg Brandl g.bra...@gmx.net wrote:
This is probably sophistry, but if an issue is invalid, it doesn't need
a patch :)
Not only, but it generally gets closed too.
The
Hi,
Seven months after my first commit related to this issue, the full test suite
of Python 3.2 pass with ASCII, ISO-8859-1 and UTF-8 locale encodings in a non-
ascii source directory. It means that Python 3.2 now process correctly
filenames in all modules, build scripts and other utilities,
On 10/18/2010 07:07 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
Seriously, though, what it indicates is indicates is that we need a unit
test for the patch to be complete. We have a number of issues with
patches but no tests, I believe. Which order 'unit test' and 'fix'
occur in is arbitrary in practice. I
On 10/18/2010 08:53 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
Hi,
Seven months after my first commit related to this issue, the full test suite
of Python 3.2 pass with ASCII, ISO-8859-1 and UTF-8 locale encodings in a non-
ascii source directory. It means that Python 3.2 now process correctly
filenames in all
Congratulations Victor! This is not a small feat. The PSU should send
you cookies to thank you, but they won’t since they don’t exist and
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
23 matches
Mail list logo
