Re: [Python-Dev] 3.1 performance

2009-03-08 Thread Victor Stinner
Hi, So, 3.1 is 30% faster in user CPU time, even though it probably has more tests (...) Wow! I just downloaded Python 2.6.1, 3.0.1 and 3.1alpha1, compiled them on 32 and 64 bits CPU, and ran pybench 2.1(*). Summary (minimum total) on 32 bits CPU: * Python 2.6.1: 8762 ms * Python 3.0.1:

Re: [Python-Dev] 3.1 performance

2009-03-08 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Hi, Victor Stinner victor.stinner at haypocalc.com writes: Summary (minimum total) on 32 bits CPU: * Python 2.6.1: 8762 ms * Python 3.0.1: 8977 ms * Python 3.1a1: 9228 ms (slower than 3.0) Have you compiled with or without --with-computed-gotos? Regards Antoine.

Re: [Python-Dev] 3.1 performance

2009-03-08 Thread Christian Heimes
Antoine Pitrou wrote: Hi, Victor Stinner victor.stinner at haypocalc.com writes: Summary (minimum total) on 32 bits CPU: * Python 2.6.1: 8762 ms * Python 3.0.1: 8977 ms * Python 3.1a1: 9228 ms (slower than 3.0) Have you compiled with or without --with-computed-gotos? Why is the

Re: [Python-Dev] 3.1 performance

2009-03-08 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Christian Heimes lists at cheimes.de writes: Why is the feature still disabled by default? Marc-André expressed concerns that it might trigger compiler issues. PS: Holy moly! Computed gotos totally put my Python on fire! The feature increases the minimum run-time by approx. 25% and the

Re: [Python-Dev] 3.1 performance

2009-03-08 Thread Collin Winter
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 7:30 AM, Christian Heimes li...@cheimes.de wrote: Antoine Pitrou wrote: Hi, Victor Stinner victor.stinner at haypocalc.com writes: Summary (minimum total) on 32 bits CPU:  * Python 2.6.1: 8762 ms  * Python 3.0.1: 8977 ms  * Python 3.1a1: 9228 ms (slower than 3.0)

Re: [Python-Dev] 3.1 performance

2009-03-08 Thread Victor Stinner
Le Sunday 08 March 2009 13:20:34 Antoine Pitrou, vous avez écrit : Hi, Victor Stinner victor.stinner at haypocalc.com writes: Summary (minimum total) on 32 bits CPU: * Python 2.6.1: 8762 ms * Python 3.0.1: 8977 ms * Python 3.1a1: 9228 ms (slower than 3.0) Have you compiled with or

Re: [Python-Dev] 3.1 performance

2009-03-08 Thread Guido van Rossum
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 4:05 AM, Victor Stinner victor.stin...@haypocalc.com wrote: I just downloaded Python 2.6.1, 3.0.1 and 3.1alpha1, compiled them on 32 and 64 bits CPU, and ran pybench 2.1(*). Summary (minimum total) on 32 bits CPU:  * Python 2.6.1: 8762 ms  * Python 3.0.1: 8977 ms  *

Re: [Python-Dev] 3.1 performance

2009-03-07 Thread Hirokazu Yamamoto
Antoine Pitrou wrote: Hello, Out of curiosity, I timed running the test suite (./python -m test.regrtest) in non-debug mode, in both the release30-maint and py3k branches: * release30-maint got: 302 tests OK. [...] 165.79user 26.03system 5:01.75elapsed 63%CPU * py3k got: 304 tests OK. [...]