Re: Django packages - proposed name changes

2012-03-04 Thread Bohuslav Kabrda
- Original Message - Am 02.03.2012 10:56, schrieb Bohuslav Kabrda: Ok, so after having this approved, here is the tracking page that I came up with. I'd like you all to go through it and say if it's ok/discuss things that may not be clear.

Re: Django packages - proposed name changes

2012-03-02 Thread Bohuslav Kabrda
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/27/2012 08:28 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 18/01/12 14:01, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: It seems actually, that there are pretty straightforward guidelines for renaming packages:

Re: Django packages - proposed name changes

2012-03-02 Thread Matthias Runge
Am 02.03.2012 10:56, schrieb Bohuslav Kabrda: Ok, so after having this approved, here is the tracking page that I came up with. I'd like you all to go through it and say if it's ok/discuss things that may not be clear. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bkabrda/Django_rename Thanks! Great,

Re: Django packages - proposed name changes

2012-02-27 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/27/2012 08:28 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 18/01/12 14:01, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: It seems actually, that there are pretty straightforward guidelines for renaming packages:

Re: Django packages - proposed name changes

2012-01-18 Thread Bohuslav Kabrda
- Original Message - -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 18/01/12 14:01, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: It seems actually, that there are pretty straightforward guidelines for renaming packages: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Renaming_Process#Re-review_required