> "ZJ" == Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes:
ZJ> This guidelines are just too vague, and I think this is the source
ZJ> of many disagreements over naming.
Well, there is
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Libraries_and_Applications
which I don't think is particularly vague.
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:46:42AM +0200, Petr Viktorin wrote:
> On 08/10/2017 02:49 AM, Ben Rosser wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >This is following up on a brief conversation I was part of in IRC
> >(#fedora-devel) earlier:
> >
> >I've never been quite sure how to name packages written in Python when
> >the
On 08/10/2017 02:49 AM, Ben Rosser wrote:
Hi,
This is following up on a brief conversation I was part of in IRC
(#fedora-devel) earlier:
I've never been quite sure how to name packages written in Python when
they are just applications. Many "applications" written in Python
still install themsel
On 10 August 2017 at 10:49, Ben Rosser wrote:
> As a counter-proposal I would suggest that, as we currently do, we
> require the python3-prefix to be provided by the package, but
> explicitly leave it to the packager+reviewer's discretion whether or
> not the prefix must be part of the real name,
