Is retrace.fedoraproject.org useless for Python exceptions?

2019-12-11 Thread Felix Schwarz
I'm wondering if there is a way to get the Python exception message via retrace/abrt? From what I can see the web interface only shows the call stack but without a specific exception there is not much I can do. (I saw the exception message when a user created a bugzilla bug) Example: https://ret

Re: Is retrace.fedoraproject.org useless for Python exceptions?

2019-12-11 Thread Lumir Balhar
Hello. I don't know these tools but you can guess what happened from the file/line combination in the stack and from the error name which contains the name of the exception. It'd be better to have also a content of an exception. Have a nice day. Lumír On 12/11/19 9:23 AM, Felix Schwarz wro

Re: Is retrace.fedoraproject.org useless for Python exceptions?

2019-12-11 Thread Felix Schwarz
Am 11.12.19 um 13:08 schrieb Lumir Balhar: > I don't know these tools but you can guess what happened from the file/line > combination in the stack and from the error name which contains the name of > the exception. Well, unfortunately this is not the case for certbot. It crashes in a generic imp

Re: [EPEL-devel] Re: Python 3.7 in EPEL?

2019-12-11 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 11. 12. 19 17:01, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On Tue, 10 Dec 2019 at 20:24, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hey EPEL people. We got a request to branch Python 3.7 foe EPEL 7: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781940 Are there volunteers to make that effort? And if so, should this be done

Re: Is retrace.fedoraproject.org useless for Python exceptions?

2019-12-11 Thread Felix Schwarz
Am 11.12.19 um 13:51 schrieb Felix Schwarz: > I filed https://github.com/abrt/faf/issues/856 - hopefully that is the right > place. Upstream mentioned that this is a conscious design decision as the exception message could expose private date: https://github.com/abrt/faf/wiki/uReport#anonymity I