Re: Django packages - proposed name changes

- Original Message - -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 18/01/12 14:01, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: It seems actually, that there are pretty straightforward guidelines for renaming packages: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Renaming_Process#Re-review_required

Re: Django packages - proposed name changes

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/27/2012 08:28 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 18/01/12 14:01, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: It seems actually, that there are pretty straightforward guidelines for renaming packages

Re: Django packages - proposed name changes

- Original Message - Am 02.03.2012 10:56, schrieb Bohuslav Kabrda: Ok, so after having this approved, here is the tracking page that I came up with. I'd like you all to go through it and say if it's ok/discuss things that may not be clear. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: Introducing pyp2rpm - A python package to rpm specfile convertor

- Original Message - On 05/23/2012 04:57 PM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: Regarding pyp2rpm itself, running pip install pyp2rpm (or easy_install pyp2rpm) on my Fedora 16 workstation gives me a traceback with RuntimeError: That compression method is not supported. Hmm

Switching to Python 3

Hi, I'd like to start a discussion about the release where we should switch to Python 3. As I have learned recently, Ubuntu 12.10 will have Python 3 as default [1], which makes me a sad panda :( We always take pride in being close to upstream and having the bleeding edge. Python 3 is stable and

Re: Switching to Python 3

- Original Message - On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 04:42:02AM -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: - Original Message - On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, I'd like to start a discussion about the release where we should

Re: Switching to Python 3

- Original Message - On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 03:09 -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: - Original Message - On 08/06/2012 04:22 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: The only distribution that has switched is arch. When they did there was a big uproar about how arch was doing

Re: Multirelease effort: Moving to Python 3

- Original Message - On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:24:22AM -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: 3) Making all livecd packages depend on Python 3 by default (and eventually getting rid of Python 2 from livecd) - this will also require switching from Yum to DNF as a default, that is supposed

Re: Packaging Python 3.4.0

Update: - DONE: I've just created a copr repo for Python 3.4 [1] and built beta1 - IN PROGRESS: I'm now working on unbundling of pip and setuptools wheels, as mentioned in thread [2]. Progress: -- DONE: created python-wheels package for Fedora (I'll build it in copr ASAP) -- DONE: added logic to

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Proposal for Python guidelines change (in connection to Python 3 switch)

- Original Message - On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 07:18:31AM -0500, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: - Original Message - Oh, I see. Some time ago, FPC has accepted a change that says, that packages with py in name should be prefixed with python- anyway [1]. Since this only applies

Re: Python 3.4, ensurepip and wheels

- Original Message - On 11/28/2013 12:42 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: I hope I covered all the important points. Basically, we can make this work in a way acceptable for upstream, if we package setupttols and pip as wheels. It'll require some extra effort, but I think it's worth

Re: Python 3.4, ensurepip and wheels

- Original Message - On 12/12/2013 01:18 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: Well yeah, my point is that there is no upstream-acceptable way other than checking the file hashes by ensurepip, is there? If I wouldn't want to check file hashes, I'd have to query RPM for release

Re: Python 3.4.0 final has been released

- Original Message - On 03/17/2014 05:53 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: Direct link to the What's New guide: http://docs.python.org/3/whatsnew/3.4.html Thanks, Nick! Rereading that, I remembered there's more to it for Fedora than just hey, here's a shiny new version of Python 3 to be

Re: PEP453 // ensurepip // pip

- Original Message - I would say this one https://github.com/pypa/pip/issues/1351 is important for us as packagers. It makes me nervous/upset and sad altogether :-). Awesome, well that’s on the list for 1.6 so that should be the next feature release of pip. Cool, thanks a lot!

Re: Introducing Python 3.5 nightly builds for Fedora

- Original Message - On 07/03/2014 11:55 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: Other than the packaging reasons: Fedora might attract Python enthusiasts and developers as it is most likely the only Linux distro that has development version of Python packaged nightly. Developers and powerusers

Re: Python 2.7 SSL upgrade patch available for testing

- Original Message - PEP 466 approved bring the core Python 2 network security infrastructure up to speed with the modern internet. Alex Gaynor has provided a draft patch of the most complex part of that PEP, backporting the bulk of the Python 3.4 SSL module to Python 2.7:

Re: reproducible builds and python

- Original Message - Hi everyone! I've been doing some work towards reproducible builds in Fedora (mostly with various upstreams so far) and one of the elephants in the Room are obviously Pythons .pyc and .pyo files. As those contain the mtime of the original .py file, they might

Re: mock, megadeps and PyPI

- Original Message - - Original Message - From: Nick Coghlan ncogh...@redhat.com To: Fedora Python SIG python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 2:35:48 AM Subject: mock, megadeps and PyPI Jeff Fearn reminded me today of mock --megadeps, a

Re: python-sig in pkgdb2?

- Original Message - Hi all, there just was a request to test groups for pkgdb2 [1] and I thought it might be a good opportunity to maybe start sharing at least some core python packages among a few people. For instance, I maintain ipython and the dependency chain when other

Re: Template for modules that use pbr?

- Original Message - Hi, I'm trying to update git-review to 1.24. With that version, git-review uses pbr. I have no deeper knowledge of Python packaging in Fedora and only tweaked the spec file so that it works for me (cf.

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Changes in Guidelines Connected to Python 3 as Default Change

- Original Message - On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:51:40AM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote: On 4 Dec 2014 00:38, Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com wrote: - (This is not really related to the switch, but more of a general remark) In [4], it says that python 3 version of the executable

Re: Changes in Guidelines Connected to Python 3 as Default Change

- Original Message - Hi all, as you are well aware, there is the Python 3 as Default change proposed for F22 [1]. There are several guideline changes that will need to be done and some that may be done in order to improve the situation. I'd like to make this thread a sort of

Re: Apps using default Python in Fedora vs. EPEL

- Original Message - I will. Do you have any idea who I should talk to regarding EPEL? Is it also Dennis? Also dennis. Rel-eng is growing as a group so you could also put in a ticket/go to one of their weekly meetings but Dennis is probably still the one that knows the most about

Re: Apps using default Python in Fedora vs. EPEL

- Original Message - I don't really feel strongly about this, I agree that your solution has a merit (and syspython *is* better than default_python :)). I think I'll open an FPC ticket to ask FPC for their opinions on this and then I'll start taking concrete steps [1] ;) to get this

Python 3 as a Default - Status

Hi all, since the Python 3 as a Default change [1] has been accepted a while ago and is scheduled for F22, I'd like to share with you the status. The proposed change [1] mentions several goals that should be reached to pronounce python3 the default: 1) DNF is the default package manager instead

Re: Python 3 as a Default - Status

- Original Message - On 21. 1. 2015 at 01:44:32, Haïkel wrote: Thanks for the heads-up. As for the cloud image, if we switch to yum, python-urlgrabber won't be needed anymore. Umm, yes, it will be - yum uses python-urlgrabber internally. Also worth mentioning that yum itself

Re: python-sig and retiring python3-dateutil

- Original Message - Pete Travis m...@petetravis.com schrieb am Mon Jan 26 2015 at 5:24:32 PM: On 01/26/2015 08:53 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: Hi, since bug #1126521 seems to be progressing nicely, I think it would be nice to get in touch with

Apps using default Python in Fedora vs. EPEL

Hey all, I just wanted to ask for some thoughts on a problem (or rather a hardship) that is starting to show with the Python 3 transition in Fedora. I've been contacted by two maintainers of applications in Fedora for advice and have been thinking for some time how to solve this: Note: by

Re: Apps using default Python in Fedora vs. EPEL

- Original Message - On 27 January 2015 at 21:26, Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com wrote: Hey all, I just wanted to ask for some thoughts on a problem (or rather a hardship) that is starting to show with the Python 3 transition in Fedora. I've been contacted by two maintainers

Re: Apps using default Python in Fedora vs. EPEL

- Original Message - On 28 January 2015 at 03:32, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:50:07PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote: What if, instead, we were able to add a new macro that let folks *explicitly* opt in to running in the system Python, but then

Re: Apps using default Python in Fedora vs. EPEL

- Original Message - On 27 February 2015 at 11:02, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote: On Feb 25, 2015 3:14 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote: For those not following along with the FPC ticket, Toshio and Tomspur have a nice write-up of the options at

Handing over Python maintenance and Python 3 as Default

Hi all, for past two years I've been paid by Red Hat to work on Python maintenance in Fedora (among other things). Since I'm now moving to a different position inside Red Hat, I'll be handing over my work to some of my fellow teammates: - python and python3 will be maintained by Matej Stuchlik

Re: Python 3 additions to the Fedora 23 release notes?

- Original Message - Something Joe Brockmeier mentioned in his Fedora Marketing talk at Flock last week was the need for development teams to be active in providing content for the release announcements. With the Fedora 23 Alpha coming out last week, I looked at the Release Notes to

Re: Adjusting the way Fedora runs Python's test suite

On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 7:51 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > Hi folks, > > While working on bootstrapping a new community sclo-python collection, > I ran into some readability problems with the way the SCL Python spec > file runs the test suite: it uses --verbose mode, which means