2017-08-16 1:55 GMT+02:00 Yury Selivanov :
> Hi,
>
> Here's the PEP 550 version 2. Thanks to a very active and insightful
> discussion here on Python-ideas, we've discovered a number of
> problems with the first version of the PEP. This version is a complete
> rewrite (only Abstract, Rationale,
greetings all,
i like python and lot and would like to use it everywhere ... upto on the
web (not django type).
For python js-compiled versions (for makers) can you provide some syntax
guidelines for dom access ?
Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer,
Mauritius
abdurrahmaanjanhangeer.wordpress.com
___
Hi,
Here's the PEP 550 version 2. Thanks to a very active and insightful
discussion here on Python-ideas, we've discovered a number of
problems with the first version of the PEP. This version is a complete
rewrite (only Abstract, Rationale, and Goals sections were not updated).
The updated PEP
Hi Nick,
Thanks for writing this! You reminded me that it's crucial to have an
ability to fully recreate generator behaviour in an iterator. Besides
this being a requirement for a complete EC model, it is something that
compilers like Cython absolutely need.
I'm still working on a rewrite (which
On 15 August 2017 at 05:25, Yury Selivanov wrote:
> Nick, you nailed it with your example.
>
> In short: current PEP 550 defines Execution Context in such a way,
> that generators and iterators will interact differently with it. That
> means that it won't be possible to refactor an iterator class