On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 08:04:44AM -0700, Christopher Barker wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 6:08 AM Franklin? Lee
> wrote:
>
> > The proposed feature is for expressing type relations, which only
> > matters when you care about types. The feature will only be useful
> > when you care about
On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 6:08 AM Franklin? Lee
wrote:
> The proposed feature is for expressing type relations, which only
> matters when you care about types. The feature will only be useful
> when you care about types. The syntax will only help/hurt readability
> when the code cares about types.
On Sun, 16 Jun 2019 at 12:54, Franklin? Lee
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 10:26 PM Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > I don't actually know how viable this proposal is, but given that it's
> > being debated at some length, I'd like to put in my opinion that *if*
> > we're going to define an
On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 8:58 AM Dan Sommers
<2qdxy4rzwzuui...@potatochowder.com> wrote:
>
> On 6/16/19 7:49 AM, Franklin? Lee wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 10:26 PM Guido van Rossum
> wrote:
>
> >> I don't actually know how viable this proposal is, but given that
> >> it's being debated
On 6/16/19 7:49 AM, Franklin? Lee wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 10:26 PM Guido van Rossum
wrote:
>> I don't actually know how viable this proposal is, but given that
>> it's being debated at some length, I'd like to put in my opinion that
>> *if* we're going to define an operator that's
On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 10:26 PM Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I don't actually know how viable this proposal is, but given that it's being
> debated at some length, I'd like to put in my opinion that *if* we're going
> to define an operator that's (roughly) synonymous with issubclass(), it
>
Despite my concerns over code for an implementation on my previous e-mail,
it turns out that simply iterating in an `async for` loop won't yield
to the asyncio-loop. An explicit "await" inside the async-generator
is needed for that.
That makes factoring-out the code presented in the first e-mail
