>
> instead of prefixing a letter, we may be able to omit the key of
> items inside dict display.
d = {:name, :addr, ’tel': '123-4567’}
>
This is my favorite variation on the notation so far. I'll give it a +1
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 10:49 AM Atsuo Ishimoto wrote:
> Hi
> Thank you for
I like Atsou's suggestion of omitting the key for literals:
d = {:name, :addr, ’tel': '123-4567’}
but using empty kwargs feels gross:
d = dict(=name, =addr, tel='123-456')
And this feels like it could easily lead to confusion:
d = dict(name, addr, tell='123-456')
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at
Stephen J. Turnbull
> d = {first : first, last, addr1, addr2}
I'm not a huge fan of this solution. It feels a bit like a hack instead of
an intended syntax. Since prefixing characters on strings is already a
thing, I lean more towards that solution. It's slightly easier to search
(e.g. if the
I find this interesting, another solution would be for locals() to take
arguments:
dict(tel='1337-1337', **locals('name', 'surname'))
___
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
Thank you.
It unfortunately happens to me mostly while I'm working for REST web servers,
especially when writing JSON in the test suites for the app.
2020年6月11日(木) 1:24 Rhodri James :
>
> On 10/06/2020 16:38, Atsuo Ishimoto wrote:
> > Hi
> > Thank you for comments
> >
> > 2020年6月10日(水) 0:11
On 10/06/2020 16:38, Atsuo Ishimoto wrote:
Hi
Thank you for comments
2020年6月10日(水) 0:11 Rhodri James :
Python is not Perl. By that I mean Python in general tends not to use
non-alphanumeric symbols unless they already have a well established
meaning (such as quote marks, arithmetic operators
Hi
Thank you for comments
2020年6月10日(水) 12:12 Stephen J. Turnbull :
> DTRTs. How often would locals() be usable in this way? Note: in the
> case of requests, this might be a vulnerability, because the explicit
> dict display would presumably include only relevant items, while
> locals() might
Hi
Thank you for comments
2020年6月10日(水) 0:11 Rhodri James :
>
> Python is not Perl. By that I mean Python in general tends not to use
> non-alphanumeric symbols unless they already have a well established
> meaning (such as quote marks, arithmetic operators and so on).
Yeah, I don't think
Chris Angelico writes:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 1:15 PM Stephen J. Turnbull
> wrote:
> >
> > Executive summary:
> >
> > Dicts are unordered, so we can distinguish dict from set by the first
> > item (no new notation), and after that default identifiers to (name :
> > in-scope value)
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 1:15 PM Stephen J. Turnbull
wrote:
>
> Executive summary:
>
> Dicts are unordered, so we can distinguish dict from set by the first
> item (no new notation), and after that default identifiers to (name :
> in-scope value) items. Also some notational bikeshedding.
Be
Hi there!
This request is a close cousin of the recent discussion about optional
keywords arguments, which you can find in the archives at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/thread/MILIX6HSW3PRUNWWP6BN2G2D7PXYFZJ7/
A lot of the same comments for and against apply
11 matches
Mail list logo
