On 2019-04-24 18:48, Brett Cannon wrote:
Since bytecode is a CPython-specific implementaiton detail I don't know
if it makes sense to enshrine an assembler for it in the stdlib (if you
were to ask me today if I thought the dis module belonged in the stdlib
I would probably say "no", but I also
`dis` module was my only reference for this proposal. If majority doesn't
want a new implementation-specific module, it is best to withdraw this
proposal.
Brett Cannon , 24 Nis 2019 Çar, 20:49 tarihinde şunu
yazdı:
> Since bytecode is a CPython-specific implementaiton detail I don't know if
> it m
Since bytecode is a CPython-specific implementaiton detail I don't know if
it makes sense to enshrine an assembler for it in the stdlib (if you were
to ask me today if I thought the dis module belonged in the stdlib I would
probably say "no", but I also know not everyone agrees with that view :) .
It is intentionally not included -- bytecode is a detail of the
implementation and changes with each feature release, without concern for
backwards compatibility.
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 10:33 AM Batuhan Osman Taşkaya <
batuhanosmantask...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Currently it is hard to as
